OBJECTIVE: To describe and compare sudden unexpected infant death (SUID) investigations among states participating in the SUID Case Registry from 2010 through 2012. STUDY DESIGN: We analyzed observational data from 770 SUID cases identified and entered into the National Child Death Review Case Reporting System. We examined data on autopsy and death scene investigation (DSI) components, including key information about the infant sleep environment. We calculated the percentage of components that were complete, incomplete, and missing/unknown. RESULTS: Most cases (98%) had a DSI. The DSI components most frequently reported as done were the narrative description of the circumstances (90%; range, 85%-99%), and witness interviews (88%, range, 85%-98%). Critical information about 10 infant sleep environment components was available for 85% of cases for all states combined. All 770 cases had an autopsy performed. The autopsy components most frequently reported as done were histology, microbiology, and other pathology (98%; range, 94%-100%) and toxicology (97%; range, 94%-100%). CONCLUSIONS: This study serves as a baseline to understand the scope of infant death investigations in selected states. Standardized and comprehensive DSI and autopsy practices across jurisdictions and states may increase knowledge about SUID etiology and also lead to an improved understanding of the cause-specific SUID risk and protective factors. Additionally, these results demonstrate practices in the field showing what is feasible in these select states. We encourage pediatricians, forensic pathologists, and other medicolegal experts to use these findings to inform system changes and improvements in DSI and autopsy practices and SUID prevention efforts.
OBJECTIVE: To describe and compare sudden unexpected infantdeath (SUID) investigations among states participating in the SUID Case Registry from 2010 through 2012. STUDY DESIGN: We analyzed observational data from 770 SUID cases identified and entered into the National ChildDeath Review Case Reporting System. We examined data on autopsy and death scene investigation (DSI) components, including key information about the infant sleep environment. We calculated the percentage of components that were complete, incomplete, and missing/unknown. RESULTS: Most cases (98%) had a DSI. The DSI components most frequently reported as done were the narrative description of the circumstances (90%; range, 85%-99%), and witness interviews (88%, range, 85%-98%). Critical information about 10 infant sleep environment components was available for 85% of cases for all states combined. All 770 cases had an autopsy performed. The autopsy components most frequently reported as done were histology, microbiology, and other pathology (98%; range, 94%-100%) and toxicology (97%; range, 94%-100%). CONCLUSIONS: This study serves as a baseline to understand the scope of infantdeath investigations in selected states. Standardized and comprehensive DSI and autopsy practices across jurisdictions and states may increase knowledge about SUID etiology and also lead to an improved understanding of the cause-specific SUID risk and protective factors. Additionally, these results demonstrate practices in the field showing what is feasible in these select states. We encourage pediatricians, forensic pathologists, and other medicolegal experts to use these findings to inform system changes and improvements in DSI and autopsy practices and SUID prevention efforts.
Keywords:
autopsy; child death review; coroners; death scene investigation; forensic pathologists; infant mortality; medical examiners; sudden infant death syndrome; surveillance
Authors: Tracey S Corey; Randy Hanzlick; John Howard; Clifford Nelson; Henry Krous Journal: Am J Forensic Med Pathol Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 0.921
Authors: Carri Cottengim; Sharyn Parks; Dale Rhoda; Tom Andrew; Kurt B Nolte; John Fudenberg; Mary Ann Sens; Jennifer Brustrom; Betsy Payn; Carrie K Shapiro-Mendoza Journal: Forensic Sci Med Pathol Date: 2019-11-18 Impact factor: 2.007
Authors: Kristin M Burns; Lauren Bienemann; Lena Camperlengo; Carri Cottengim; Theresa M Covington; Heather Dykstra; Meghan Faulkner; Rosemarie Kobau; Alexa B Erck Lambert; Heather MacLeod; Sharyn E Parks; Ellen Rosenberg; Mark W Russell; Carrie K Shapiro-Mendoza; Esther Shaw; Niu Tian; Vicky Whittemore; Jonathan R Kaltman Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2017-03 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Carrie K Shapiro-Mendoza; Vincent J Palusci; Benjamin Hoffman; Erich Batra; Marc Yester; Tracey S Corey; Mary Ann Sens Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2021-09-20 Impact factor: 9.703
Authors: Manuel Rueda; Jennifer L Wagner; Tierney C Phillips; Sarah E Topol; Evan D Muse; Jonathan R Lucas; Glenn N Wagner; Eric J Topol; Ali Torkamani Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2017-11-09
Authors: Laura Gould Crandall; Joyce H Lee; Daniel Friedman; Kelly Lear; Katherine Maloney; J Keith Pinckard; Peter Lin; Thomas Andrew; Kristin Roman; Kristen Landi; Heather Jarrell; Alex K Williamson; J C Upshaw Downs; Kathy Pinneri; Christopher William; Joseph J Maleszewski; R Ross Reichard; Orrin Devinsky Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2020-10-01