Joanna Garstang1, Catherine Ellis, Peter Sidebotham. 1. Division of Mental Health and Wellbeing, Warwick Medical School, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK, Joanna.j.garstang@warwick.ac.uk.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Many countries now have detailed investigations following sudden unexpected death in infancy (SUDI) but there is no clear evidence as to the most effective way to investigate SUDI. This systematic literature review addresses the following questions: What are the current models of practice for investigating SUDI? What is the evidence to support these investigative models? What are the key factors for effective SUDI investigation? METHODS: This was a systematic review of papers from Europe, North America, and Australasia, detailing models of SUDI investigation or the outcomes of SUDI investigations. RESULTS: The review includes data detailing four different models of investigation: police-led, coroner or medical examiner-led, healthcare-led or joint agency approach models. There were 18 different publications providing evidence of effectiveness of these models. All models, with the exception of police-led models, have the potential to reach best practice standards for SUDI investigation. Key factors identified for effective SUDI investigation include the need for mandatory investigation, strong leadership, integration with coronial services, and for investigations to be provided by specialist professionals. CONCLUSION: Detailed SUDI investigation should lead to greater understanding of why infants die and should help prevent future deaths. The challenge is now to ensure that local SUDI investigative practices are as effective as possible.
PURPOSE: Many countries now have detailed investigations following sudden unexpected death in infancy (SUDI) but there is no clear evidence as to the most effective way to investigate SUDI. This systematic literature review addresses the following questions: What are the current models of practice for investigating SUDI? What is the evidence to support these investigative models? What are the key factors for effective SUDI investigation? METHODS: This was a systematic review of papers from Europe, North America, and Australasia, detailing models of SUDI investigation or the outcomes of SUDI investigations. RESULTS: The review includes data detailing four different models of investigation: police-led, coroner or medical examiner-led, healthcare-led or joint agency approach models. There were 18 different publications providing evidence of effectiveness of these models. All models, with the exception of police-led models, have the potential to reach best practice standards for SUDI investigation. Key factors identified for effective SUDI investigation include the need for mandatory investigation, strong leadership, integration with coronial services, and for investigations to be provided by specialist professionals. CONCLUSION: Detailed SUDI investigation should lead to greater understanding of why infants die and should help prevent future deaths. The challenge is now to ensure that local SUDI investigative practices are as effective as possible.
Authors: Peter Sidebotham; Peter S Blair; Carol Evason-Coombe; Margaret Edmond; Ellen Heckstall-Smith; Peter Fleming Journal: Arch Dis Child Date: 2009-11-29 Impact factor: 3.791
Authors: Henry F Krous; J Bruce Beckwith; Roger W Byard; Torleiv O Rognum; Thomas Bajanowski; Tracey Corey; Ernest Cutz; Randy Hanzlick; Thomas G Keens; Edwin A Mitchell Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Reinhold Kerbl; Heinz Zotter; Christa Einspieler; Peter Roll; Manfred Ratschek; Gerhard Köstl; Volker Strenger; Erna Hoffmann; Anni Perrogon; Waltraud Zötsch; Peter Schober; Alfred Gränz; Werner Sauseng; Isolde Bachler; Thomas Kenner; Osman Ipsiroglu; Ronald Kurz Journal: Wien Klin Wochenschr Date: 2003-12-30 Impact factor: 2.275
Authors: Peter S Blair; Peter Sidebotham; Carol Evason-Coombe; Margaret Edmonds; Ellen M A Heckstall-Smith; Peter Fleming Journal: BMJ Date: 2009-10-13
Authors: Alexa B Erck Lambert; Sharyn E Parks; Lena Camperlengo; Carri Cottengim; Rebecca L Anderson; Theresa M Covington; Carrie K Shapiro-Mendoza Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2016-04-22 Impact factor: 4.406