Literature DB >> 27112986

Studying avian encephalization with geometric morphometrics.

Jesús Marugán-Lobón1,2, Akinobu Watanabe3,4, Soichiro Kawabe5.   

Abstract

Encephalization is a core concept in comparative neurobiology, aiming to quantify the neurological capacity of organisms. For measuring encephalization, many studies have employed relative brain sizes corrected for expected allometric scaling to body size. Here we highlight the utility of a multivariate geometric morphometric (GM) approach for visualizing and analyzing neuroanatomical shape variation associated with encephalization. GM readily allows the statistical evaluation of covariates, such as size, and many software tools exist for visualizing their effects on shape. Thus far, however, studies using GM have not attempted to translate the meaning of encephalization to shape data. As such, we tested the statistical relationship between size and encephalization quotients (EQs) to brain shape utilizing a broad interspecific sample of avian endocranial data. Although statistically significant, the analyses indicate that allometry accounts for <10% of total neuroanatomical shape variation. Notably, we find that EQs, despite being corrected for allometric scaling based on size, contain size-related neuroanatomical shape changes. In addition, much of what is traditionally considered encephalization comprises clade-specific trends in relative forebrain expansion, particularly driven by landbirds. EQs, therefore, fail to capture 90% of the total neuroanatomical variation after correcting for allometry and shared phylogenetic history. Moving forward, GM techniques provide crucial tools for investigating key drivers of this vast, largely unexplored aspect of avian brain morphology.
© 2016 Anatomical Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aves; allometry; brain; encephalization; geometric morphometrics

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27112986      PMCID: PMC4948052          DOI: 10.1111/joa.12476

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anat        ISSN: 0021-8782            Impact factor:   2.610


  28 in total

1.  Encephalization and allometric trajectories in the genus Homo: evidence from the Neandertal and modern lineages.

Authors:  Emiliano Bruner; Giorgio Manzi; Juan Luis Arsuaga
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-12-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Brain to body ratios and the evolution of intelligence.

Authors:  H J JERISON
Journal:  Science       Date:  1955-04-01       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Testing and quantifying phylogenetic signals and homoplasy in morphometric data.

Authors:  Christian Peter Klingenberg; Nelly A Gidaszewski
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 15.683

4.  New insight on the anatomy and architecture of the avian neurocranium.

Authors:  Jesús Marugán-Lobón; Angela D Buscalioni
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.064

5.  Variation in avian brain shape: relationship with size and orbital shape.

Authors:  Soichiro Kawabe; Tetsuya Shimokawa; Hitoshi Miki; Seiji Matsuda; Hideki Endo
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 2.610

6.  The evolution of cerebrotypes in birds.

Authors:  Andrew N Iwaniuk; Peter L Hurd
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  2005-03-08       Impact factor: 1.808

7.  The recognition and evaluation of homoplasy in primate and human evolution.

Authors:  C A Lockwood; J G Fleagle
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.868

8.  Big birds and their brains: paleoneurology of the New Zealand moa.

Authors:  K W S Ashwell; R P Scofield
Journal:  Brain Behav Evol       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 1.808

9.  Ontogenetic Shape Change in the Chicken Brain: Implications for Paleontology.

Authors:  Soichiro Kawabe; Seiji Matsuda; Naoki Tsunekawa; Hideki Endo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Brain scaling in mammalian evolution as a consequence of concerted and mosaic changes in numbers of neurons and average neuronal cell size.

Authors:  Suzana Herculano-Houzel; Paul R Manger; Jon H Kaas
Journal:  Front Neuroanat       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 3.856

View more
  5 in total

1.  Body size and allometric variation in facial shape in children.

Authors:  Jacinda R Larson; Mange F Manyama; Joanne B Cole; Paula N Gonzalez; Christopher J Percival; Denise K Liberton; Tracey M Ferrara; Sheri L Riccardi; Emmanuel A Kimwaga; Joshua Mathayo; Jared A Spitzmacher; Campbell Rolian; Heather A Jamniczky; Seth M Weinberg; Charles C Roseman; Ophir Klein; Ken Lukowiak; Richard A Spritz; Benedikt Hallgrimsson
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 2.868

2.  Facial shape manifestations of growth faltering in Tanzanian children.

Authors:  Joanne B Cole; Mange F Manyama; Dejana Nikitovic; Paula N Gonzalez; Denise K Liberton; Warren M Wilson; Campbell Rolian; Jacinda R Larson; Emmanuel Kimwaga; Joshua Mathayo; Charles C Roseman; Stephanie A Santorico; Ken Lukowiak; Richard A Spritz; Benedikt Hallgrimsson
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  Inside the head of snakes: influence of size, phylogeny, and sensory ecology on endocranium morphology.

Authors:  Marion Segall; Raphaël Cornette; Arne R Rasmussen; Christopher J Raxworthy
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 3.270

4.  Are endocasts good proxies for brain size and shape in archosaurs throughout ontogeny?

Authors:  Akinobu Watanabe; Paul M Gignac; Amy M Balanoff; Todd L Green; Nathan J Kley; Mark A Norell
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 2.610

5.  Abnormal cranium development in children and adolescents affected by syndromes or diseases associated with neurodysfunction.

Authors:  Agnieszka Guzik; Lidia Perenc; Mariusz Drużbicki; Justyna Podgórska-Bednarz
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.