Literature DB >> 34287703

Inside the head of snakes: influence of size, phylogeny, and sensory ecology on endocranium morphology.

Marion Segall1,2, Raphaël Cornette3, Arne R Rasmussen4, Christopher J Raxworthy5.   

Abstract

Environmental properties, and the behavioral habits of species impact sensory cues available for foraging, predator avoidance and inter/intraspecific communication. Consequently, relationships have been discovered between the sensory ecology and brain morphology in many groups of vertebrates. However, these types of studies have remained scare on snake. Here, we investigate the link between endocranial shape and the sensory-related ecology of snakes by comparing 36 species of snakes for which we gathered six sensory-ecology characteristics. We use µCT scanning and 3D geometric morphometrics to compare their endocranium in a phylogenetically informed context. Our results demonstrate that size is a major driver of endocranial shape, with smaller species tending to maximize endocranial volume using a more bulbous shape, while larger species share an elongate endocranial morphology. Phylogeny plays a secondary role with more derived snakes diverging the most in endocranial shape, compared to other species. The activity period influences the shape of the olfactory and optic tract, while the foraging habitat impacts the shape of the cerebellum and cranial nerve regions: structures involved in orientation, equilibrium, and sensory information. However, we found that endocranial morphology alone is not sufficient to predict the activity period of a species without prior knowledge of its phylogenetic relationship. Our results thus demonstrate the value of utilizing endocranial shape as complementary information to size and volume in neurobiological studies.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D geometric morphometrics; Activity period; Allometry; Ecological morphology; Foraging habitat; Snake endocranium

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34287703     DOI: 10.1007/s00429-021-02340-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Struct Funct        ISSN: 1863-2653            Impact factor:   3.270


  29 in total

1.  Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile.

Authors:  Simon P Blomberg; Theodore Garland; Anthony R Ives
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 2.  Best practices for digitally constructing endocranial casts: examples from birds and their dinosaurian relatives.

Authors:  Amy M Balanoff; G S Bever; Matthew W Colbert; Julia A Clarke; Daniel J Field; Paul M Gignac; Daniel T Ksepka; Ryan C Ridgely; N Adam Smith; Christopher R Torres; Stig Walsh; Lawrence M Witmer
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  Brain modularity across the theropod-bird transition: testing the influence of flight on neuroanatomical variation.

Authors:  Amy M Balanoff; Jeroen B Smaers; Alan H Turner
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  Function of the appendages in tentacled snakes (Erpeton tentaculatus).

Authors:  K C Catania; D B Leitch; D Gauthier
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  Comparative brain morphology of Neotropical parrots (Aves, Psittaciformes) inferred from virtual 3D endocasts.

Authors:  Julieta Carril; Claudia Patricia Tambussi; Federico Javier Degrange; María Juliana Benitez Saldivar; Mariana Beatriz Julieta Picasso
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 2.610

6.  Phototactic tails: Evolution and molecular basis of a novel sensory trait in sea snakes.

Authors:  Jenna M Crowe-Riddell; Bruno F Simões; Julian C Partridge; David M Hunt; Steven Delean; Julian G Schwerdt; James Breen; Alastair Ludington; David J Gower; Kate L Sanders
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 6.185

7.  A generalized K statistic for estimating phylogenetic signal from shape and other high-dimensional multivariate data.

Authors:  Dean C Adams
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 15.683

8.  A method for assessing phylogenetic least squares models for shape and other high-dimensional multivariate data.

Authors:  Dean C Adams
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  Comparative morphology of snake (Squamata) endocasts: evidence of phylogenetic and ecological signals.

Authors:  Rémi Allemand; Renaud Boistel; Gheylen Daghfous; Zoé Blanchet; Raphaël Cornette; Nathalie Bardet; Peggy Vincent; Alexandra Houssaye
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2017-09-28       Impact factor: 2.610

10.  The evolution of scale sensilla in the transition from land to sea in elapid snakes.

Authors:  Jenna M Crowe-Riddell; Edward P Snelling; Amy P Watson; Anton Kyuseop Suh; Julian C Partridge; Kate L Sanders
Journal:  Open Biol       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 6.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.