Literature DB >> 27112835

Impact of the mandatory implementation of reporting guidelines on reporting quality in a surgical journal: A before and after study.

Riaz Ahmed Agha1, Alexander J Fowler2, Christopher Limb3, Katharine Whitehurst4, Robert Coe5, Harkiran Sagoo6, Daniyal J Jafree4, Charmilie Chandrakumar7, Buket Gundogan4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Journals are an important conduit for the publication of research. However, the reporting quality of research has been shown to be lacking. We sought to determine if reporting quality could be improved by mandating compliance with the relevant reporting guidelines during the submission process to a single surgical journal.
METHODS: The policy above was implemented in the International Journal of Surgery (IJS) in March 2013. This involved requiring all authors submitting observational studies, randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews to submit completed STROBE, CONSORT and PRISMA Statement checklists respectively along with their paper, making them available to the editor and peer-reviewers. Articles were analysed in three distinct periods from 2012 to 2014, before and after guideline implementation by two independent teams.
RESULTS: Our results show that overall STROBE compliance following implementation of the policy increased by a statistically significant 12% (68%-77%, p = 0.00018). Similarly CONSORT compliance increased (50%-70%) as did PRISMA compliance (48%-76%). The items that improved the most were those providing detail on study design, outcome definitions as well as measurement, how patients and quantitative variables were handled during the analyses and discussing limitations and detailing potential sources of bias.
CONCLUSION: Implementing a policy mandating the submission of a completed reporting guideline checklist for observational studies, RCTs and systematic reviews can increase compliance. We advocate this measure for other journals and for other study types.
Copyright © 2016 IJS Publishing Group Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CONSORT; PRISMA; Reporting guidelines; Research; STROBE

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27112835     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.04.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Surg        ISSN: 1743-9159            Impact factor:   6.071


  20 in total

1.  Endorsing Reporting Guidelines: the Journal of Infection Prevention helps show the way!

Authors:  Sheldon Stone; Barry Cookson
Journal:  J Infect Prev       Date:  2016-10-19

Review 2.  Assessment of the reporting quality of RCTs for novel oral anticoagulants in venous thromboembolic disease based on the CONSORT statement.

Authors:  Ioannis Liampas; Antonios Chlinos; Vasileios Siokas; Alexandros Brotis; Efthimios Dardiotis
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 3.  Scoping review on interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines in health research.

Authors:  David Blanco; Doug Altman; David Moher; Isabelle Boutron; Jamie J Kirkham; Erik Cobo
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 4.  Systemic Review and Meta-analysis of Impact of Splenectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Chikara Kunisaki; Sho Sato; Nobuhiro Tsuchiya; Jun Watanabe; Tsutomu Sato; Kazuhisa Takeda; Kohei Kasahara; Takashi Kosaka; Hirotoshi Akiyama; Itaru Endo; Toshihiro Misumi
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 5.  Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review.

Authors:  Matthew J Page; David Moher
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2017-12-19

6.  Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions published 2012-2016: protocol for a systematic review.

Authors:  Dawid Pieper; Michelle Pollock; Ricardo M Fernandes; Roland Brian Büchter; Lisa Hartling
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2017-04-07

7.  Description of complex interventions: analysis of changes in reporting in randomised trials since 2002.

Authors:  Bridget Candy; Victoria Vickerstaff; Louise Jones; Michael King
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  Using risk of bias domains to identify opportunities for improvement in food- and nutrition-related research: An evaluation of research type and design, year of publication, and source of funding.

Authors:  E F Myers; J S Parrott; P Splett; M Chung; D Handu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Does the medical literature remain inadequately described despite having reporting guidelines for 21 years? - A systematic review of reviews: an update.

Authors:  Yanling Jin; Nitika Sanger; Ieta Shams; Candice Luo; Hamnah Shahid; Guowei Li; Meha Bhatt; Laura Zielinski; Bianca Bantoto; Mei Wang; Luciana Pf Abbade; Ikunna Nwosu; Alvin Leenus; Lawrence Mbuagbaw; Muhammad Maaz; Yaping Chang; Guangwen Sun; Mitchell Ah Levine; Jonathan D Adachi; Lehana Thabane; Zainab Samaan
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2018-09-27

10.  Quality of reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in emergency medicine based on the PRISMA statement.

Authors:  Femke Nawijn; Wietske H W Ham; Roderick M Houwert; Rolf H H Groenwold; Falco Hietbrink; Diederik P J Smeeing
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2019-02-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.