Literature DB >> 27111194

The role of automated feedback in training and retaining biological recorders for citizen science.

René van der Wal1, Nirwan Sharma2, Chris Mellish2, Annie Robinson3, Advaith Siddharthan2.   

Abstract

The rapid rise of citizen science, with lay people forming often extensive biodiversity sensor networks, is seen as a solution to the mismatch between data demand and supply while simultaneously engaging citizens with environmental topics. However, citizen science recording schemes require careful consideration of how to motivate, train, and retain volunteers. We evaluated a novel computing science framework that allowed for the automated generation of feedback to citizen scientists using natural language generation (NLG) technology. We worked with a photo-based citizen science program in which users also volunteer species identification aided by an online key. Feedback is provided after photo (and identification) submission and is aimed to improve volunteer species identification skills and to enhance volunteer experience and retention. To assess the utility of NLG feedback, we conducted two experiments with novices to assess short-term (single session) and longer-term (5 sessions in 2 months) learning, respectively. Participants identified a specimen in a series of photos. One group received only the correct answer after each identification, and the other group received the correct answer and NLG feedback explaining reasons for misidentification and highlighting key features that facilitate correct identification. We then developed an identification training tool with NLG feedback as part of the citizen science program BeeWatch and analyzed learning by users. Finally, we implemented NLG feedback in the live program and evaluated this by randomly allocating all BeeWatch users to treatment groups that received different types of feedback upon identification submission. After 6 months separate surveys were sent out to assess whether views on the citizen science program and its feedback differed among the groups. Identification accuracy and retention of novices were higher for those who received automated feedback than for those who received only confirmation of the correct identification without explanation. The value of NLG feedback in the live program, captured through questionnaires and evaluation of the online photo-based training tool, likewise showed that the automated generation of informative feedback fostered learning and volunteer engagement and thus paves the way for productive and long-lived citizen science projects.
© 2016 The Authors. Conservation Biology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biological recording; bumblebee identification; entrenamiento; generación de lenguaje natural; identificación de abejorros; motivación y retención de voluntarios; natural language generation; registro biológico; training; volunteer motivation and retention

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27111194     DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12705

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conserv Biol        ISSN: 0888-8892            Impact factor:   6.560


  8 in total

1.  Hoping for optimality or designing for inclusion: Persistence, learning, and the social network of citizen science.

Authors:  Julia K Parrish; Timothy Jones; Hillary K Burgess; Yurong He; Lucy Fortson; Darlene Cavalier
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Decision-making of citizen scientists when recording species observations.

Authors:  Diana E Bowler; Netra Bhandari; Lydia Repke; Christoph Beuthner; Corey T Callaghan; David Eichenberg; Klaus Henle; Reinhard Klenke; Anett Richter; Florian Jansen; Helge Bruelheide; Aletta Bonn
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  The feasibility of using citizens to segment anatomy from medical images: Accuracy and motivation.

Authors:  Judith R Meakin; Ryan M Ames; J Charles G Jeynes; Jo Welsman; Michael Gundry; Karen Knapp; Richard Everson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Designing online species identification tools for biological recording: the impact on data quality and citizen science learning.

Authors:  Nirwan Sharma; Laura Colucci-Gray; Advaith Siddharthan; Richard Comont; René van der Wal
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Community science participants gain environmental awareness and contribute high quality data but improvements are needed: insights from Bumble Bee Watch.

Authors:  Victoria J MacPhail; Shelby D Gibson; Sheila R Colla
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Citizen science data reveals the need for keeping garden plant recommendations up-to-date to help pollinators.

Authors:  Helen B Anderson; Annie Robinson; Advaith Siddharthan; Nirwan Sharma; Helen Bostock; Andrew Salisbury; Stuart Roberts; René van der Wal
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  The Role of Citizen Science in Promoting Health Equity.

Authors:  Lisa G Rosas; Patricia Rodriguez Espinosa; Felipe Montes Jimenez; Abby C King
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 21.870

8.  Volunteering in the Citizen Science Project "Insects of Saxony"-The Larger the Island of Knowledge, the Longer the Bank of Questions.

Authors:  Nicola Moczek; Matthias Nuss; Jana Katharina Köhler
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2021-03-20       Impact factor: 2.769

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.