| Literature DB >> 27109242 |
Berkay Ekici1, Aslı Tanındı2, Gamze Ekici3, Erdem Diker4.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to estimate the influence of the duration of mobile phone use on heart rate variability (HRV) in healthy individuals.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27109242 PMCID: PMC5324882 DOI: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2016.6717
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Anatol J Cardiol ISSN: 2149-2263 Impact factor: 1.596
Baseline characteristics according to the duration of mobile phone use
| Controls (n=35) | Group I (n=37) | Group II (n=37) | Group III (n=39) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 28.0 (23.0–33.0) | 27.0 (22.0–37.5) | 31.0 (26.0–40.0) | 33.0 (25.0–40.0) | 0.133 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 23.4 (21.1–27.8) | 24.0 (21.3–27.4) | 27.5 (22.5–32.0) | 25.9 (23.0–28.4) | 0.078 |
| Telephone calls, n, per month | 0.0 (0.0–0.0)a,b,c | 101.0 (96.0–108.5)a,d,e | 161.0 (131.1–198.2)b,d,f | 279.0 (230.1–345.3)c,e,f | |
| TDC, min, per month | 0.0 (0.0–0.0)a,b,c | 161.2 (126.2–209.5)a,d,e | 429.0 (329.1–537.2)b,d,f | 1050.0 (743.2–1458.0)c,e,f | |
| ETCD, min | 0.0 (0.0–0.0)a,b,c | 1.2 (0.8–1.6)a,d,e | 2.0 (1.5–3.1)b,d,f | 3.2 (2.9–4.2)c,e,f | |
| SDNN | 149.0 (125.0–178.0)b,c,e | 139.5 (125.2–172.2)e | 129.0 (111.2–161.7) | 125.0 (99.0–159.0)e | |
| SDANN | 135.0 (110.0–164.0)b,c,e | 122.0 (111.2–156.5)e | 116.0 (97.2–148.5) | 107.5 (87.0–131.7)e | |
| RMSSD | 37.0 (27.0–48.0)b,c | 37.5 (29.2–48.0)d,e | 27.5 (21.0–44.0)b,d,f | 25.0 (17.0–31.2)c,e,f | |
| pNN50 | 15.0 (7.0–23.0)b,c,d,e,f | 13.5 (8.0–22.5)d,e | 7.5 (2.0–21.0)b,d,f | 5.0 (1.0–10.0)c,e,f | |
| Min HR | 47.5 (43.2–51.7) | 46.0 (44.0–51.0) | 48.0 (43.0–52.0) | 49.0 (43.0–55.0) | 0.663 |
| Max HR | 145.5 (124.5–157.0) | 145.0 (128.0–154.0) | 137.0 (125.0–148.0) | 139.0 (129.0–148.0) | 0.296 |
| Av HR | 78.0 (71.0–82.0) | 79.0 (73.0–84.5) | 77.0 (70.5–84.0) | 77.0 (72.0–85.0) | 0.779 |
| LF | 876.2 (576.3–1310.5) | 847.5 (610.6–1223.1) | 856.1 (501.1–1206.6) | 736.3 (455.1–1147.2) | 0.675 |
| HF | 406.7 (233.2–640.5)b,c | 390.8 (243.7–598.4)e | 201.2 (117.9–437.0)b | 144.6 (70.2–241.9)c,e | |
| LF/HF ratio | 1.9 (1.6–2.8)b,c | 2.2 (1.6–3.0) | 3.7 (2.2–5.9)b | 5.4 (3.6–7.9)c | |
| VLF | 3038.2±1658.3 | 2274.4 (1655.9–3755.3) | 2226.0 (1530.9–3587.8) | 2316.9 (1289.7–3387.4) | 0.387 |
| Total power | 3704.9 (2612.4–5892.2) | 3623.5 (2652.1–5580.3) | 3251.0 (2230.8–5342.1) | 3186.8 (2106.3–4395.3) | 0.186 |
The groups were determined by the duration of mobile phone use (Control group: not using mobile phone, Group I: <30 min/day, Group II: 30–60 min/day, Group III: >60 min/day). Avaverage; BMI - body mass index; ETCD - each telephone call duration; HF - high-frequency power; HR - heart rate; LF - low-frequency power; Max - maximum; Min - minimum; pNN50 - the percentage of successive N–N differences >50 ms for each 5-min. interval; RMSSD - the root mean square successive difference of N–Ns; SDANN - the standard deviation of 5 min mean values of N–Ns; SDNN - the standard deviation of N–Ns; TDC - total duration of calls; VLF - very low frequency power. Kruskal–Wallis test was used for the differences among groups. Conover–Inman test was performed for the binary comparisons among the groups and the P value was set at 0.05. Significant differences were found between: a - control vs. group I; b - control vs. group II; c - control vs. group III; d - group I vs. group II; e - group I vs. group III; f - group II vs. group III
Binary comparisons according to the duration of mobile phone use
| Controls- Group I | Controls- Group II | Controls- Group III | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 0.986 | 0.133 | 0.074 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 0.537 | 0.052 | |
| SDNN | 0.414 | ||
| SDANN | 0.337 | ||
| RMSSD | 0.681 | ||
| pNN50 | 0.734 | ||
| Min. HR | 0.785 | 0.798 | 0.367 |
| Max. HR | 0.920 | 0.134 | 0.309 |
| Av. HR | 0.324 | 0.789 | 0.585 |
| LF/HF ratio | 0.510 | ||
| VLF | 0.639 | 0.242 | 0.111 |
| Total power | 0.871 | 0.241 | 0.055 |
The groups were determined by the duration of mobile phone use (Control group: not using mobile phone, Group I: <30 min/day, Group II: 30–60 min/day, Group III: >60 min/day). Av - average; BMI - body mass index; HF - high-frequency power; HR - heart rate; LF - low-frequency power; Max - maximum; Min - minimum; pNN50 - the percentage of successive N–N differences >50 ms for each 5-min interval; RMSSD - the root mean square successive difference of N–Ns; SDANN - the standard deviation of 5 min mean values of N–Ns; SDNN - the standard deviation of N–Ns; VLF - very low frequency power. Conover–Inman test was performed for the binary comparisons among the groups and the P value was set at 0.05
Figure 1LF/HF ratios according to the duration of mobile phone use. HF - high-frequency power; LF - low-frequency power. The groups were determined by the duration of mobile phone use (Control group: not using mobile phone, Group I: <30 min/day, Group II: 30–60 min/day, and Group III: >60 min/day). For this figure, the error bar graphic was used
Figure 2According to Spearman’s rank correlation, the positive correlation between the LF/HF ratio and total duration of calls (P<0.001, r=0.757) is shown. HF - high-frequency power; LF - low-frequency power