Literature DB >> 27108393

Dizygotic twin pregnancies after medically assisted reproduction and after natural conception: maternal and perinatal outcomes.

Alexandra J Bensdorp1, Chantal W Hukkelhoven2, Fulco van der Veen3, Ben W J Mol4, Cornelis B Lambalk5, Madelon van Wely3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare maternal and perinatal outcomes in dizygotic twin pregnancies conceived after medically assisted reproduction (MAR) with outcomes after natural conception (NC).
DESIGN: Nationwide registry based study.
SETTING: Academic medical center. PATIENT(S): Primiparous women who delivered opposite sex twins between January 2000 and December 2012 in the Netherlands, comprising dizygotic twin pregnancies: 6,694 women, 470 after ovulation induction (OI), 511 after intrauterine insemination with controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (IUI-COH), 2,437 after in vitro fertilization (IVF) with intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), and 3,276 after NC. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Multivariable logistic regression and generalized linear mixed models to evaluate differences in outcomes: maternal outcomes of hypertension, preeclampsia, preterm delivery, hemorrhage, and delivery mode, perinatal outcomes including small for gestational age (SGA) with birth weight <10th percentile, birth weight <1,500 g, 5-minute Apgar score <7, admission to neonatal intensive care unit, congenital anomalies, and perinatal mortality. RESULT(S): We found no statistically significant differences in maternal or perinatal outcomes after OI compared with NC. Women pregnant after IVF-ICSI had a lower risk for hypertension (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66-0.83) compared with women pregnant after NC. After IUI-COH more children had Apgar scores <7 (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.38; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05-1.81) and perinatal mortality rates were higher (aOR 1.56; 95% CI, 1.04-2.33) compared with NC. We found no differences in perinatal outcomes after IVF-ICSI compared with NC. CONCLUSION(S): Overall, maternal and perinatal risks other than those due to multiplicity are similar for twin pregnancies conceived after MAR and after NC.
Copyright © 2016 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Intrauterine insemination; in vitro fertilization; natural conception; ovulation induction; twin pregnancy

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27108393     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.03.042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  8 in total

1.  [Influence of twin pregnancy by assisted reproductive technology on neonatal outcomes].

Authors:  Xiao-Hui Chen; Jin-Gai Zhu; Zhang-Bin Yu; Cheng-Yao Jiang; Shu-Ping Han
Journal:  Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-01

2.  Adverse pregnancy, birth, and infant outcomes in twins: effects of maternal fertility status and infant gender combinations; the Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technology.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Daksha Gopal; Howard Cabral; Judy E Stern; Hafsatou Diop
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Dizygotic twin from conjoined oocytes: a case report.

Authors:  Yasmin Magdi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 4.  Risk of adverse pregnancy and perinatal outcomes after high technology infertility treatment: a comprehensive systematic review.

Authors:  Stefano Palomba; Roy Homburg; Susanna Santagni; Giovanni Battista La Sala; Raoul Orvieto
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 5.211

5.  Perinatal outcome of monochorionic and dichorionic twins after spontaneous and assisted conception: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Karien E A Hack; Marijn E M S Vereycken; Helen L Torrance; Corine Koopman-Esseboom; Jan B Derks
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 3.636

6.  Comparative study on the pregnancy outcomes of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer between patients with different ovarian responses (a STROBE-compliant article).

Authors:  Hai-Xia Jin; Ai-Xiang Lv; Zhao-Ting Wu; Shuang Wen; Xiang-Yang Zhang; Da-Chuan Jin; Ying-Pu Sun
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.817

7.  Assisted Reproductive Technology Treatment, the Catalyst to Amplify the Effect of Maternal Infertility on Preterm Birth.

Authors:  Youzhen Zhang; Wei Zhou; Wanbing Feng; Jingmei Hu; Kuona Hu; Linlin Cui; Zi-Jiang Chen
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 6.055

8.  The impact of assisted reproductive technology on prenatally diagnosed fetal growth restriction in dichorionic twin pregnancies.

Authors:  Viola Seravalli; Lorenzo Maoloni; Lucia Pasquini; Sara Bolzonella; Giovanni Sisti; Felice Petraglia; Mariarosaria Di Tommaso
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.