Literature DB >> 20657216

Contribution of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the characterization of hepatocellular carcinomas and dysplastic nodules in cirrhotic liver.

Peng-Ju Xu1, Fu-Hua Yan, Jian-Hua Wang, Yan Shan, Yuan Ji, Cai-Zhong Chen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) for the characterization of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and dysplastic nodule (DN) in cirrhotic liver, compared with contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI).
METHODS: A total of 54 patients with 40 HCC and 19 DN lesions were included in our study, and all lesions were histopathologically confirmed. All lesions were evaluated with CE-MRI, and breath-hold DWI was performed with b = 500 s/mm. The signal intensity (SI) of the lesions were classified as low, iso-, slightly high, and strongly high SI compared with that of the surrounding liver parenchyma on DWI for qualitative assessment. Apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) and lesion-to-liver ADC ratio of HCCs and DNs were measured and compared by using the Mann-Whitney U test. The lesions were characterized with the use of CE-MRI criteria and DWI, respectively. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to assess the diagnostic value of DWI, CE-MRI, and these techniques combined in the differentiation of HCCs from DNs.
RESULTS: In the qualitative analysis, among 40 HCCs, 39 (97.5%) had slightly high or strongly high SI on DWI, and 1 (2.5%) had low SI; only 4 (21.5%) of 19 DNs had slightly high SI, and 15 (78.95%) had iso-SI or low SI. The mean (SD) ADC and ADC ratio for HCCs (1.28 x 10 [0.25] mm/s and 0.88 [0.15], respectively) were significantly lower (P < 0.01 and P < 0.001, respectively) than those for DNs (1.53 x 10 [0.33] mm/s and 1.00 [0.08], respectively). The area, Az, under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the SI feature, the ADC ratio, and the ADCs based on the diagnosis of HCC versus DN were 0.88, 0.81, and 0.68, respectively. When the slightly high SI of lesion with a cutoff ADC ratio less than 0.92 was applied as a criterion, the Az, the sensitivity, the specificity, and the accuracy of DWI for the diagnosis of HCC versus DN were 0.81, 67.50%, 94.74%, and 76.27%, respectively. The corresponding Az, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CE-MRI were 0.70, 82.50%, 57.89%, and 74.58%, respectively. Combined DWI plus CE-MRI had 0.91 Az, 97.50% sensitivity, and 93.22% accuracy, which increased significantly compared with those of CE-MRI alone.
CONCLUSIONS: Diffusion-weighted MRI can provide additional information to differentiate HCC from DN. Combined with CE-MRI, DWI allows improved characterization of HCC versus DN in cirrhotic liver.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20657216     DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181da3671

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr        ISSN: 0363-8715            Impact factor:   1.826


  40 in total

Review 1.  CT and MR imaging diagnosis and staging of hepatocellular carcinoma: part I. Development, growth, and spread: key pathologic and imaging aspects.

Authors:  Jin-Young Choi; Jeong-Min Lee; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Differentiation of early hepatocellular carcinoma from benign hepatocellular nodules on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI.

Authors:  H Rhee; M-J Kim; M-S Park; K A Kim
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Diagnosis value of focal liver lesions with SonoVue®-enhanced ultrasound compared with contrast-enhanced computed tomography and contrast-enhanced MRI: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yang Guang; LiMei Xie; Hailong Ding; AiLu Cai; Ying Huang
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 4.553

4.  Comparison of diffusion-weighted imaging and T2-weighted single shot fast spin-echo: Implications for LI-RADS characterization of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Robert M Hicks; Judy Yee; Michael A Ohliger; Stefanie Weinstein; Jeffrey Kao; Nabia S Ikram; Thomas A Hope
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 5.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the cirrhotic liver: An update.

Authors:  Agnes Watanabe; Miguel Ramalho; Mamdoh AlObaidy; Hye Jin Kim; Fernanda G Velloni; Richard C Semelka
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2015-03-27

Review 6.  Advances in computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Tiffany Hennedige; Sudhakar K Venkatesh
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Prognosis of small hepatocellular nodules detected only at the hepatobiliary phase of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging as hypointensity in cirrhosis or chronic hepatitis.

Authors:  Atsushi Higaki; Katsuyoshi Ito; Tsutomu Tamada; Teruki Sone; Akihiko Kanki; Yasufumi Noda; Kazuya Yasokawa; Akira Yamamoto
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in gynecologic cancers.

Authors:  Shigenobu Motoshima; Hiroyuki Irie; Takahiko Nakazono; Toshiharu Kamura; Sho Kudo
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 4.401

9.  Role of Diffusion Weighted Imaging (DWI) for Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) Detection and its Grading on 3T MRI: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Shiva Shankar; Naveen Kalra; Anmol Bhatia; Radhika Srinivasan; Paramjeet Singh; Radha K Dhiman; Niranjan Khandelwal; Yogesh Chawla
Journal:  J Clin Exp Hepatol       Date:  2016-09-01

10.  Diffusion-weighted MRI in intrahepatic bile duct adenoma arising from the cirrhotic liver.

Authors:  Chansik An; Sumi Park; Yoon Jung Choi
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 3.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.