Literature DB >> 27106889

Reading Level and Comprehension of Research Consent Forms: An Integrative Review.

Gabriella Foe1, Elaine L Larson2.   

Abstract

Consent forms continue to be at a higher reading level than the recommended sixth to eighth grade, making it difficult for participants to comprehend information before enrolling in research. To assess and address the extent of the problem regarding the level of literacy of consent forms and update previously published reports, we conducted an integrative literature review of English language research published between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2013; 35 descriptive and eight intervention studies met inclusion criteria. Results confirmed that developing forms at eighth-grade level was attainable though not practiced. It was found that risks of participation was the section most poorly understood. There was also a lack of consensus regarding the most effective method to increase comprehension. Further research using standardized tools is needed to determine the best approach for improving consent forms and processes.
© The Author(s) 2016.

Entities:  

Keywords:  comprehension; consent form; human research; informed consent; reading level; research study; understanding

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27106889     DOI: 10.1177/1556264616637483

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics        ISSN: 1556-2646            Impact factor:   1.742


  13 in total

1.  Reaping the Bounty of Publicly Available Clinical Trial Consent Forms.

Authors:  Holly Fernandez Lynch; Emily A Largent; Deborah A Zarin
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2017 Nov-Dec

2.  Informational needs for participation in bioequivalence studies: the perspectives of experienced volunteers.

Authors:  Nut Koonrungsesomboon; Saranyapin Potikanond; Mingkwan Na Takuathung; Wutigri Nimlamool; Juntra Karbwang
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  Effective Practices to Improve Recruitment, Retention, and Partnerships in School-Based Studies.

Authors:  Laureen H Smith; Rick L Petosa
Journal:  J Pediatr Health Care       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 1.812

4.  Understanding the Use of Optimal Formatting and Plain Language When Presenting Key Information in Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Erin D Solomon; Jessica Mozersky; Matthew P Wroblewski; Kari Baldwin; Meredith V Parsons; Melody Goodman; James M DuBois
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 1.742

5.  Too Dense and Too Detailed: Evaluation of the Health Literacy Attributes of an Informed Consent Document.

Authors:  Vanessa W Simonds; Dedra Buchwald
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2019-12-10

6.  Readability and Content Assessment of Informed Consent Forms for Phase II-IV Clinical Trials in China.

Authors:  Gaiyan Wen; Xinchun Liu; Lihua Huang; Jingxian Shu; Nana Xu; Ruifang Chen; Zhijun Huang; Guoping Yang; Xiaomin Wang; Yuxia Xiang; Yao Lu; Hong Yuan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The Appropriateness of Language Found in Research Consent Form Templates: A Computational Linguistic Analysis.

Authors:  Alexander Villafranca; Stephanie Kereliuk; Colin Hamlin; Andrea Johnson; Eric Jacobsohn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Assessing usefulness and researcher satisfaction with consent form templates.

Authors:  Elaine L Larson; Alan Teller; Alejandra N Aguirre; Jhia Jackson; Dodi Meyer
Journal:  J Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2017-08

9.  A comparison of genomic laboratory reports and observations that may enhance their clinical utility for providers and patients.

Authors:  Kyle Walter Davis; Lori Hamby Erby; Katie Fiallos; Megan Martin; Edward Robert Wassman
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 2.183

10.  The impact of central IRB's on informed consent readability and trial adherence in SPRINT.

Authors:  Leonardo Tamariz; Mitscher Gajardo; Carolyn H Still; Lisa H Gren; Elizabeth Clark; Sandy Walsh; Jeff Whittle; John Nord; Thomas Ramsey; Gabriel Contreras
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2019-07-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.