Emily Chan1, Lori R Arlinghaus2, Dana B Cardin1, Laura Goff1, Jordan D Berlin1, Alexander Parikh1, Richard G Abramson2, Thomas E Yankeelov3, Scott Hiebert1, Nipun Merchant4, Srividya Bhaskara5, Anuradha Bapsi Chakravarthy6. 1. Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, United States. 2. Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, United States. 3. Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, United States; Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, United States; Departments of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Biomedical Engineering, Physics, and Cancer Biology, Vanderbilt University, United States. 4. Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, UHealth - University of Miami Health System, United States. 5. Department of Radiation Oncology and Department of Oncological Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, United States. 6. Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, United States. Electronic address: bapsi.chak@vanderbilt.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This single institution phase I trial determined the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of concurrent vorinostat and capecitabine with radiation in non-metastatic pancreatic cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-one patients received escalating doses of vorinostat (100-400mg daily) during radiation. Capecitabine was given 1000mg q12 on the days of radiation. Radiation consisted of 30Gy in 10 fractions. Vorinostat dose escalation followed the standard 3+3 design. No dose escalation beyond 400mg vorinostat was planned. Diffusion-weighted (DW)-MRI pre- and post-treatment was used to evaluate in vivo tumor cellularity. RESULTS: The MTD of vorinostat was 400mg. Dose limiting toxicities occurred in one patient each at dose levels 100mg, 300mg, and 400mg: 2 gastrointestinal toxicities and one thrombocytopenia. The most common adverse events were lymphopenia (76%) and nausea (14%). The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) increased in most tumors. Nineteen (90%) patients had stable disease, and two (10%) had progressive disease at time of surgery. Eleven patients underwent surgical exploration with four R0 resections and one R1 resection. Median overall survival was 1.1years (95% confidence interval 0.78-1.35). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of vorinostat 400mg daily M-F and capecitabine 1000mg q12 M-F with radiation (30Gy in 10 fractions) was well tolerated with encouraging median overall survival.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This single institution phase I trial determined the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of concurrent vorinostat and capecitabine with radiation in non-metastatic pancreatic cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-one patients received escalating doses of vorinostat (100-400mg daily) during radiation. Capecitabine was given 1000mg q12 on the days of radiation. Radiation consisted of 30Gy in 10 fractions. Vorinostat dose escalation followed the standard 3+3 design. No dose escalation beyond 400mg vorinostat was planned. Diffusion-weighted (DW)-MRI pre- and post-treatment was used to evaluate in vivo tumor cellularity. RESULTS: The MTD of vorinostat was 400mg. Dose limiting toxicities occurred in one patient each at dose levels 100mg, 300mg, and 400mg: 2 gastrointestinal toxicities and one thrombocytopenia. The most common adverse events were lymphopenia (76%) and nausea (14%). The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) increased in most tumors. Nineteen (90%) patients had stable disease, and two (10%) had progressive disease at time of surgery. Eleven patients underwent surgical exploration with four R0 resections and one R1 resection. Median overall survival was 1.1years (95% confidence interval 0.78-1.35). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of vorinostat 400mg daily M-F and capecitabine 1000mg q12 M-F with radiation (30Gy in 10 fractions) was well tolerated with encouraging median overall survival.
Authors: P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-02-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Owen A O'Connor; Mark L Heaney; Lawrence Schwartz; Stacie Richardson; Robert Willim; Barbara MacGregor-Cortelli; Tracey Curly; Craig Moskowitz; Carol Portlock; Steven Horwitz; Andrew D Zelenetz; Stanley Frankel; Victoria Richon; Paul Marks; William K Kelly Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-12-05 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Thierry Conroy; Françoise Desseigne; Marc Ychou; Olivier Bouché; Rosine Guimbaud; Yves Bécouarn; Antoine Adenis; Jean-Luc Raoul; Sophie Gourgou-Bourgade; Christelle de la Fouchardière; Jaafar Bennouna; Jean-Baptiste Bachet; Faiza Khemissa-Akouz; Denis Péré-Vergé; Catherine Delbaldo; Eric Assenat; Bruno Chauffert; Pierre Michel; Christine Montoto-Grillot; Michel Ducreux Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-05-12 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Matthew H G Katz; Robert Marsh; Joseph M Herman; Qian Shi; Eric Collison; Alan P Venook; Hedy L Kindler; Steven R Alberts; Philip Philip; Andrew M Lowy; Peter W T Pisters; Mitchell C Posner; Jordan D Berlin; Syed A Ahmad Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2013-02-23 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: T M Breslin; K R Hess; D B Harbison; M E Jean; K R Cleary; A P Dackiw; R A Wolff; J L Abbruzzese; N A Janjan; C H Crane; J N Vauthey; J E Lee; P W Pisters; D B Evans Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: William Kevin Kelly; Owen A O'Connor; Lee M Krug; Judy H Chiao; Mark Heaney; Tracy Curley; Barbara MacGregore-Cortelli; William Tong; J Paul Secrist; Lawrence Schwartz; Stacy Richardson; Elaina Chu; Semra Olgac; Paul A Marks; Howard Scher; Victoria M Richon Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-05-16 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: William Small; Jordan Berlin; Gary M Freedman; Theodore Lawrence; Mark S Talamonti; Mary F Mulcahy; A Bapsi Chakravarthy; Andre A Konski; Mark M Zalupski; Philip A Philip; Timothy J Kinsella; Nipun B Merchant; John P Hoffman; Al B Benson; Steven Nicol; Rong M Xu; John F Gill; Cornelius J McGinn Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-02-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Arthur E Frankel; Keith T Flaherty; George J Weiner; Robert Chen; Nilofer S Azad; Michael J Pishvaian; John A Thompson; Matthew H Taylor; Daruka Mahadevan; A Craig Lockhart; Ulka N Vaishampayan; Jordan D Berlin; David C Smith; John Sarantopoulos; Matthew Riese; Mansoor N Saleh; Chul Ahn; Eugene P Frenkel Journal: Oncologist Date: 2017-03-17
Authors: Steven G DuBois; M Meaghan Granger; Susan Groshen; Denice Tsao-Wei; Lingyun Ji; Anasheh Shamirian; Scarlett Czarnecki; Fariba Goodarzian; Rachel Berkovich; Hiroyuki Shimada; Judith G Villablanca; Kieuhoa T Vo; Navin Pinto; Yael P Mosse; John M Maris; Suzanne Shusterman; Susan L Cohn; Kelly C Goldsmith; Brian Weiss; Gregory A Yanik; Clare J Twist; Meredith S Irwin; Daphne A Haas-Kogan; Julie R Park; Araz Marachelian; Katherine K Matthay Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2021-07-16 Impact factor: 44.544