Literature DB >> 2710623

Duration, time constant, and decay of the linear motion aftereffect as a function of inspection duration.

M Hershenson.   

Abstract

Subjects rated the strength of the motion aftereffect (MAE) produced by the upward motion of a horizontal grating in two experiments. Inspection periods ranged from 30 to 900 sec in Experiment 1 and from 20 to 120 sec in Experiment 2. A minimum of 22 h elapsed between trials. The decay time constant increased as the square root of the inspection duration for values between 1 min and 15 min of inspection. The ratings suggested that the MAEs consisted of three phases: an initial maximum-strength phase, a decay phase, and a tail. The duration of all three phases increased and the decay rate decreased with increasing inspection duration over the entire range. The results indicate that duration, time constant, and decay rate are not fixed properties of the motion-processing channels in the visual system.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2710623     DOI: 10.3758/bf03210704

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  16 in total

1.  EVIDENCE FOR A PHYSIOLOGICAL EXPLANATION OF THE WATERFALL PHENOMENON AND FIGURAL AFTER-EFFECTS.

Authors:  H B BARLOW; R M HILL
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1963-12-28       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Effect of inspection time and direction of rotation on a generalized form of the spiral after-effect.

Authors:  P BAKAN; K MIZUSAWA
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1963-06

3.  Visual processing of four kinds of relative motion.

Authors:  D Regan
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  [Temporal factors in the visual after-effect of movement].

Authors:  C Bonnet
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1973-07       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Evaluation of long term visual motion after-image following monocular stimulation.

Authors:  K Kalfin; S Locke
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1972-02       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Visual motion perception: experimental modification.

Authors:  R H Masland
Journal:  Science       Date:  1969-08-22       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Visual responses to vorticity and the neural analysis of optic flow.

Authors:  D Regan; K I Beverley
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 2.129

8.  Marathon adaptation to spatial contrast: saturation in sight.

Authors:  S Magnussen; M W Greenlee
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Illusory motion in depth: aftereffect of adaptation to changing size.

Authors:  D Regan; K I Beverley
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Recovery from adaptation to moving gratings.

Authors:  M J Keck; B Pentz
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 1.490

View more
  11 in total

1.  Attentional diversion during adaptation affects the velocity as well as the duration of motion after-effects.

Authors:  M S Georgiades; J P Harris
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Distinct mechanism for long-term contrast adaptation.

Authors:  Min Bao; Stephen A Engel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The dynamics of visual adaptation to faces.

Authors:  David A Leopold; Gillian Rhodes; Kai-Markus Müller; Linda Jeffery
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-05-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Visual motion aftereffect from understanding motion language.

Authors:  Alexia Toskos Dils; Lera Boroditsky
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-08-30       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Fore-aft translation aftereffects.

Authors:  Benjamin T Crane
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-05-05       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Are high-level aftereffects perceptual?

Authors:  Katherine R Storrs
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-02-19

7.  Self-motion sensitivity to visual yaw rotations in humans.

Authors:  Alessandro Nesti; Karl A Beykirch; Paolo Pretto; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Emotional Actions Are Coded via Two Mechanisms: With and without Identity Representation.

Authors:  Joanna Wincenciak; Jennie Ingham; Tjeerd Jellema; Nick E Barraclough
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-05-11

9.  Visual mode switching: Improved general compensation for environmental color changes requires only one exposure per day.

Authors:  Yanjun Li; Katherine E M Tregillus; Stephen A Engel
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 2.004

10.  Dynamics of spatial distortions reveal multiple time scales of motion adaptation.

Authors:  Neil W Roach; Paul V McGraw
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.