Literature DB >> 27105906

Comparative study among three different phototherapy protocols to treat chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis in hamsters.

Luana Campos1, Érika P Cruz1, Filipi S Pereira1, Victor E Arana-Chavez1, Alyne Simões1.   

Abstract

In this study, clinical, biochemical and histological analysis were used to compare different phototherapies, including LED, low and high-power laser (HPL) for the treatment of chemotherapy (CT)-induced oral mucositis (OM). One-hundred-fifty hamsters were divided into five groups: C: control; CH: CT/OM induction; L: CT/OM induction and treatment with LED (635 nm, 1.2 J), HL: CT/OM induction and treatment with HPL (808 nm, 10 J), LL: CT/OM induction and treatment with low-level laser therapy (LLLT) (660 nm, 1.2 J). OM was induced by scratches performed on check pouch mucosa after two injections of 5-Fluorouracil. The experiment lasted 10 days and OM was analyzed by specific clinical scales on days 5, 7 and 10. The animals were euthanized and the cheek pouch mucosa removed for biochemical (TNF-α concentration) and histological (light microscopy) analysis. After statistical analysis, the authors' results showed LED and LLLT therapies were efficient treatments for OM, decreasing TNF-α concentration on day 7 (p < 0.05) and completely healing the mucosa on day 10. HPL showed no interference in final healing of OM. According to the methodology used and the results obtained in the present study, LLLT and LED therapies were the best choices to decrease the severity of OM, accelerating tissue repair and decreasing the inflammatory process. Clinical evaluation of OM in Groups CH, LL, L and HL and their respective arrangement of phototherapy treatments at different time intervals (5, 7 and 10 days).
© 2016 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.

Entities:  

Keywords:  5-Fluorouracil; LED; chemotherapy; high-power; laser therapy; low-level; oral mucositis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27105906     DOI: 10.1002/jbio.201600014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biophotonics        ISSN: 1864-063X            Impact factor:   3.207


  9 in total

1.  Phototherapy is unable to exert beneficial effects on orthodontic tooth movement in rat molars.

Authors:  Simone P Friedrichsdorf; Emily Zaniboni; Alyne Simões; Victor E Arana-Chavez; Gladys C Dominguez
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Effect of photobiomodulation therapy on reducing the chemo-induced oral mucositis severity and on salivary levels of CXCL8/interleukin 8, nitrite, and myeloperoxidase in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Daniella Ribeiro Naves Salvador; Danilo Figueiredo Soave; Nancy Tomoko Sacono; Eduardo Fernandes de Castro; Geisa Badauy Lauria Silva; Larissa Pereira E Silva; Tarcília Aparecida Silva; Marize Campos Valadares; Elismauro Francisco Mendonça; Aline Carvalho Batista
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 3.161

3.  New photobiomodulation protocol prevents oral mucositis in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients-a retrospective study.

Authors:  Camila Weissheimer; Marina Curra; Lauro J Gregianin; Liane E Daudt; Vivian P Wagner; Marco Antonio T Martins; Manoela D Martins
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 3.161

4.  Comparison of photobiomodulation using either an intraoral or an extraoral laser on oral mucositis induced by chemotherapy in rats.

Authors:  Stéfanie Thieme; Julia Turra Ribeiro; Bernardo Gindri Dos Santos; Renata de Almeida Zieger; Mara Luana Batista Severo; Marco Antonio Trevizani Martins; Cristiane Matté; Manoela Domingues Martins
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 5.  Treatment Parameters of Photobiomodulation in the Prevention of Non-surgical Cancer Treatment-Induced Oral Mucositis: A Review of Preclinical Studies.

Authors:  Alaba Tolulope Agbele; Sedigheh Marjaneh Hejazi; Ahmad Reza Dehpour; Razieh Mohammad Jafari; Arash Elyassi; Mahmoud Bagheri; Mojtaba Seydi
Journal:  J Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2021-09-29

6.  Effects of different protocols of defocused high-power laser on the viability and migration of myoblasts-a comparative in vitro study.

Authors:  Fernanda Thomé Brochado; Belkiss Câmara Mármora; Paloma Santos Campos; Tuany Rafaeli Schmidt; Kristianne Porta Santos Fernandes; Sandra Kalil Bussadori; Lucas Gonçalves Santos; Vivian Petersen Wagner; Marcelo Lazzaron Lamers; Manoela Domingues Martins
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 2.555

7.  Photobiomodulation: lasers vs. light emitting diodes?

Authors:  Vladimir Heiskanen; Michael R Hamblin
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol Sci       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 3.982

8.  Efficacy of diode-emitting diode (LED) photobiomodulation in pain management, facial edema, trismus, and quality of life after extraction of retained lower third molars: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Carlos Alberto Tenis; Manoela Domingues Martins; Marcela Leticia Leal Gonçalves; Daniela de Fátima Teixeira da Silva; João Júlio da Cunha Filho; Marco Antonio Trevizani Martins; Raquel Agnelli Mesquita-Ferrari; Sandra Kalil Bussadori; Kristianne Porta Santos Fernandes
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.817

9.  Clinical efficacy of low-level laser therapy in plantar fasciitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Weifeng Jiang; Chuanxi Tang; Xiao Zhang; Jie Xiang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 1.817

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.