Adam J Culbreth1, Andrew Westbrook1, Ziye Xu2, Deanna M Barch3, James A Waltz2. 1. Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University in Saint Louis. 2. University of Maryland School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Maryland Psychiatric Research Center. 3. Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University in Saint Louis; Department of Psychiatry & Radiology, Washington University in Saint Louis.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Midbrain dopaminergic neurons code a computational quantity, reward prediction error (RPE), which has been causally related to learning. Recently, this insight has been leveraged to link phenomenological and biological levels of understanding in psychiatric disorders, such as schizophrenia. However, results have been mixed, possibly due to small sample sizes. Here we present results from two studies with relatively large Ns to assess VS RPE in schizophrenia. METHODS: In the current study we analyzed data from two independent studies, involving a total of 87 chronic medicated schizophrenia patients and 61 controls. Subjects completed a probabilistic reinforcement-learning task in conjunction with fMRI scanning. We fit each participant's choice behavior to a Q-learning model and derived trial-wise RPEs. We then modeled BOLD signal data with parametric regressor functions using these values to determine whether patient and control groups differed in prediction-error-related BOLD signal modulations. RESULTS: Both groups demonstrated robust VS RPE BOLD activations. Interestingly, these BOLD activation patterns did not differ between groups in either study. This was true when we included all participants in the analysis, as well as when we excluded participants whose data was not sufficiently fit by the models. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate the utility of computational methods in isolating/testing underlying mechanisms of interest in psychiatric disorders. Importantly, similar VS RPE signal encoding across groups suggests that this mechanism does not drive task deficits in these patients. Deficits may instead stem from aberrant prefrontal/parietal circuits associated with maintenance and selection of goal-relevant information.
BACKGROUND: Midbrain dopaminergic neurons code a computational quantity, reward prediction error (RPE), which has been causally related to learning. Recently, this insight has been leveraged to link phenomenological and biological levels of understanding in psychiatric disorders, such as schizophrenia. However, results have been mixed, possibly due to small sample sizes. Here we present results from two studies with relatively large Ns to assess VS RPE in schizophrenia. METHODS: In the current study we analyzed data from two independent studies, involving a total of 87 chronic medicated schizophreniapatients and 61 controls. Subjects completed a probabilistic reinforcement-learning task in conjunction with fMRI scanning. We fit each participant's choice behavior to a Q-learning model and derived trial-wise RPEs. We then modeled BOLD signal data with parametric regressor functions using these values to determine whether patient and control groups differed in prediction-error-related BOLD signal modulations. RESULTS: Both groups demonstrated robust VS RPE BOLD activations. Interestingly, these BOLD activation patterns did not differ between groups in either study. This was true when we included all participants in the analysis, as well as when we excluded participants whose data was not sufficiently fit by the models. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate the utility of computational methods in isolating/testing underlying mechanisms of interest in psychiatric disorders. Importantly, similar VS RPE signal encoding across groups suggests that this mechanism does not drive task deficits in these patients. Deficits may instead stem from aberrant prefrontal/parietal circuits associated with maintenance and selection of goal-relevant information.
Authors: Katherine S Button; John P A Ioannidis; Claire Mokrysz; Brian A Nosek; Jonathan Flint; Emma S J Robinson; Marcus R Munafò Journal: Nat Rev Neurosci Date: 2013-04-10 Impact factor: 34.870
Authors: Victoria B Gradin; Poornima Kumar; Gordon Waiter; Trevor Ahearn; Catriona Stickle; Marteen Milders; Ian Reid; Jeremy Hall; J Douglas Steele Journal: Brain Date: 2011-04-10 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Peter Smittenaar; Thomas H B FitzGerald; Vincenzo Romei; Nicholas D Wright; Raymond J Dolan Journal: Neuron Date: 2013-10-24 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: James A Waltz; Zuzana Kasanova; Thomas J Ross; Betty J Salmeron; Robert P McMahon; James M Gold; Elliot A Stein Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-02-27 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Henry W Chase; Polina Loriemi; Tobias Wensing; Simon B Eickhoff; Thomas Nickl-Jockschat Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2018-03-24 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: James A Waltz; Ziye Xu; Elliot C Brown; Rebecca R Ruiz; Michael J Frank; James M Gold Journal: Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging Date: 2017-08-12
Authors: Dennis Hernaus; Michael J Frank; Elliot C Brown; Jaime K Brown; James M Gold; James A Waltz Journal: Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging Date: 2018-12-07
Authors: Junghee Lee; Amy M Jimenez; Eric A Reavis; William P Horan; Jonathan K Wynn; Michael F Green Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2019-04-25 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Andreas Heinz; Graham K Murray; Florian Schlagenhauf; Philipp Sterzer; Anthony A Grace; James A Waltz Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2019-09-11 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Erin K Moran; James M Gold; Cameron S Carter; Angus W MacDonald; J Daniel Ragland; Steven M Silverstein; Steven J Luck; Deanna M Barch Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2020-08-17 Impact factor: 7.723