Literature DB >> 27105290

The Performance of First-Trimester Anatomy Scan: A Decision Analysis.

Lorie M Harper1, S Lindsay Wood1, Sheri M Jenkins1, John Owen1, Joseph R Biggio1.   

Abstract

Introduction First-trimester ultrasound (US) for anatomy assessment may improve anomaly detection, but it may also increase overall US utilization. We sought to assess the utility of first-trimester US for evaluation of fetal anatomy. Materials and Methods A decision analytic model was created to compare first- plus second-trimester anatomy scans to second-trimester scan alone in four populations: general, normal weight women, obese women, and diabetics. Probability estimates were obtained from the literature. Outcomes considered were number of: major structural anomalies detected, US performed, and false-positive US. Multivariable sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate the consistency of the model with varying assumptions. Results A strategy of first- plus second-trimester US detected the highest number of anomalies but required more US examinations per anomaly detected. The addition of a first-trimester anatomy US was associated with a small increase in the false-positive US (< 10/10,000). In populations with higher anomaly prevalence and lower second-trimester US sensitivity (i.e., diabetes, obesity), the number of additional US performed per anomaly detected with the first-trimester US was < 60. Discussion In high-risk populations, a first-trimester US in addition to a second-trimester US may be a beneficial approach to detecting anomalies. Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27105290      PMCID: PMC4972648          DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1579652

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Perinatol        ISSN: 0735-1631            Impact factor:   1.862


  59 in total

1.  Fetal echocardiography at 11-13 weeks by transabdominal high-frequency ultrasound.

Authors:  N Persico; J Moratalla; C M Lombardi; V Zidere; L Allan; K H Nicolaides
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 7.299

2.  End-result of routine ultrasound screening for congenital anomalies: the Belgian Multicentric Study 1984-92.

Authors:  S Levi; J P Schaaps; P De Havay; R Coulon; P Defoort
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 7.299

3.  Impact of prenatal mid-trimester screening on the prevalence of fetal structural anomalies: a prospective epidemiological study.

Authors:  Z Papp; E Tóth-Pál; C Papp; Z Tóth; M Szabó; L Veress; O Török
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 7.299

4.  13-14-week fetal anatomy scan: a 5-year prospective study.

Authors:  A Ebrashy; A El Kateb; M Momtaz; A El Sheikhah; M M Aboulghar; M Ibrahim; M Saad
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 7.299

5.  Detection of fetal structural abnormalities at the 11-14 week ultrasound scan.

Authors:  M H B Carvalho; M L Brizot; L M Lopes; C H Chiba; S Miyadahira; M Zugaib
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.050

6.  Detection of fetal structural abnormalities by an 11-14-week ultrasound dating scan in an unselected Swedish population.

Authors:  Marie Cedergren; Anders Selbing
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.636

7.  Impact of maternal body mass index on the antenatal detection of congenital anomalies.

Authors:  K E Best; P W G Tennant; R Bell; J Rankin
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 6.531

8.  Maternal obesity and detection rate of fetal structural anomalies.

Authors:  Eric Hildebrand; Tomas Gottvall; Marie Blomberg
Journal:  Fetal Diagn Ther       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 2.587

9.  Screening for congenital malformations by ultrasonography in the general population of pregnant women: factors affecting the efficacy.

Authors:  Ann Tabor; Milica Zdravkovic; Annette Perslev; Lars Krag Møller; Beth Lilja Pedersen
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.636

10.  Can a complete fetal echocardiogram be performed at 12 to 16 weeks' gestation?

Authors:  Anita Moon-Grady; Shabana Shahanavaz; Michael Brook; Hanoi Rodriguez; Lisa K Hornberger
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 5.251

View more
  2 in total

1.  Audit of the appropriateness of the indication for obstetric sonography in a tertiary facility in Ghana.

Authors:  Emmanuel Kobina Mesi Edzie; Klenam Dzefi-Tettey; Philip Narteh Gorleku; Edmund Kwakye Brakohiapa; Benard Ohene Botwe; Adu Tutu Amankwa; Ewurama Andam Idun; Henry Kusodzi; Abdul Raman Asemah
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2021-09-14

2.  First trimester anomaly scan using virtual reality (VR FETUS study): study protocol for a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  C S Pietersma; A G M G J Mulders; L M Moolenaar; M G M Hunink; A H J Koning; S P Willemsen; A T J I Go; E A P Steegers; M Rousian
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 3.007

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.