Literature DB >> 27104885

Cell-based therapies for intervertebral disc and cartilage regeneration- Current concepts, parallels, and perspectives.

Srujana Vedicherla1,2, Conor T Buckley1,3.   

Abstract

Lower back pain from degenerative disc disease represents a global health burden, and presents a prominent opportunity for regenerative therapeutics. While current regenerative therapies such as autologous disc chondrocyte transplantation (ADCT), allogeneic juvenile chondrocyte implantation (NuQu®), and immunoselected allogeneic adipose derived precursor cells (Mesoblast) show exciting clinical potential, limitations remain. The heterogeneity of preclinical approaches and the paucity of clinical guidance have limited translational outcomes in disc repair, lagging almost a decade behind cartilage repair. Advances in cartilage repair have evolved to single step approaches with improved orthopedic repair and regeneration. Elements from cartilage regeneration endeavors could be adopted and applied to harness translatable approaches and deliver a clinically and economically feasible regenerative surgery for back pain. In this article, we trace the developments behind the translational success of cartilage repair, examine elements to consider in achieving disc regeneration, and the need for surgical redesign. We further discuss clinical parameters, objectives, and coordination required to deliver improved regenerative surgery. Cell source, processing, and delivery modalities are key issues to be addressed in considering surgical redesign. Advances in biomanufacturing, tissue cryobanking, and point of care cell processing technology may enable intraoperative solutions for single step procedures. To maximize translational success a triad partnership between clinicians, industry, and researchers will be critical in providing instructive clinical guidelines for design as well as practical and economic considerations. This will allow a consensus in research ventures and add regenerative surgery into the algorithm in managing and treating a debilitating condition such as back pain.
© 2016 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 35:8-22, 2017. © 2016 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomanufacturing; cartilage; intervertebral disc; intraoperative; regeneration

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27104885     DOI: 10.1002/jor.23268

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  17 in total

1.  New horizons in spine research: Intervertebral disc repair and regeneration.

Authors:  James C Iatridis; James Kang; Rita Kandel; Makarand V Risbud
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 2.  Stem cell therapy in discogenic back pain.

Authors:  Ahmed H Barakat; Vivian A Elwell; Khai S Lam
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-12

3.  MicroRNA-124-3p inhibits the differentiation of precartilaginous stem cells into nucleus pulposus-like cells via targeting FSTL1.

Authors:  Qiong Wang; Junfang Wang; Xiaofeng Gu; Dehong Feng; Ding Li; Tao Jiang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 4.  Cell-based strategies for IVD repair: clinical progress and translational obstacles.

Authors:  Abbie L A Binch; Joan C Fitzgerald; Emily A Growney; Frank Barry
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 32.286

Review 5.  Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma in Retarding Intervertebral Disc Degeneration: A Meta-Analysis of Animal Studies.

Authors:  Pei Li; Ruijie Zhang; Qiang Zhou
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-07-02       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Intervertebral Disc Repair: Current Concepts.

Authors:  Derek G Ju; Linda E Kanim; Hyun W Bae
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-05-28

7.  Matrix modification for enhancing the transport properties of the human cartilage endplate to improve disc nutrition.

Authors:  Aaron Dolor; Sara L Sampson; Ann A Lazar; Jeffrey C Lotz; Francis C Szoka; Aaron J Fields
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The knee joint loose body as a source of viable autologous human chondrocytes.

Authors:  J Melrose
Journal:  Eur J Histochem       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 3.188

9.  Quality Assessment of Surgical Disc Samples Discriminates Human Annulus Fibrosus and Nucleus Pulposus on Tissue and Molecular Level.

Authors:  Ann-Kathrin Schubert; Jeske J Smink; Mirko Arp; Jochen Ringe; Aldemar A Hegewald; Michael Sittinger
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Osteogenic protein-1 attenuates nucleus pulposus cell apoptosis through activating the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway in a hyperosmotic culture.

Authors:  Yan Yang; Xiyang Wang; Zheng Liu; Xiao Xiao; Wenkai Hu; Zhicheng Sun
Journal:  Biosci Rep       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 3.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.