| Literature DB >> 27104136 |
Brett W Fling1, Marian L Dale2, Carolin Curtze2, Katrijn Smulders2, John G Nutt2, Fay B Horak3.
Abstract
Falls in people with parkinsonism are likely related to both motor and cognitive impairments. In addition to idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD), some older adults have lower body parkinsonism (a frontal gait disorder), characterized by impaired lower extremity balance and gait as well as cognition, but without tremor or rigidity. Neuroimaging during virtual gait suggests that interhemispheric, prefrontal cortex communication may be involved in locomotion, but contributions of neuroanatomy connecting these regions to objective measures of gait in people with parkinsonism remains unknown. Our objectives were to compare the integrity of fiber tracts connecting prefrontal and sensorimotor cortical regions via the corpus callosum in people with two types of parkinsonism and an age-matched control group and to relate integrity of these callosal fibers with clinical and objective measures of mobility and cognition. We recruited 10 patients with frontal gait disorders, 10 patients with idiopathic PD and 10 age-matched healthy control participants. Participants underwent cognitive and mobility testing as well as diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging to quantify white matter microstructural integrity of interhemispheric fiber tracts. People with frontal gait disorders displayed poorer cognitive performance and a slower, wider-based gait compared to subjects with PD and age-matched control subjects. Despite a widespread network of reduced white matter integrity in people with frontal gait disorders, gait and cognitive deficits were solely related to interhemispheric circuitry employing the genu of the corpus callosum. Current results highlight the importance of prefrontal interhemispheric communication for lower extremity control in neurological patients with cognitive dysfunction.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27104136 PMCID: PMC4827724 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2016.03.006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neuroimage Clin ISSN: 2213-1582 Impact factor: 4.881
Fig. 1A) Callosal ROIs used to identify specific interhemispheric fiber tracts from one representative participant with FGD displayed on a mid-sagittal slice of the MNI_152_1mm template. B) Binarized interhemispheric tracts for each group traversing the genu.
Demographic and disease characteristics along with cognitive performance and measures of mobility. All assessments were performed in the OFF state. Values are mean (± SD). Main group effects are highlighted in bold.
| HC | PD | FGD | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 75 (62–84) | 70.1 (63–84) | 74.6 (67–84) | 0.23 |
| M/F | 4/6 | 8/2 | 7/3 | – |
| MDS-UPDRS III | N/A | 46.6 (18.26) | 33.1 (16.8) | 0.13 |
| PIGD | N/A | 7.6 (5.6) | 9.2 (3.5) | 0.46 |
| Hoehn & Yahr | N/A | 2.8 (0.83) | 3.4 (1.01) | 0.15 |
| MoCA | 26.6 (2.07) | 24.6 (4.3) | ||
| SCOPA-COG total | 31.2 (2.82) | 26.4 (5.97) | ||
| Stride width (cm) | 11.2 (2.42) | 11.2 (2.27) | ||
| Gait velocity (m/s) | 1.2 (0.11) |
Fig. 2TBSS whole-brain group differences (PD > FGD) in fractional anisotropy. No areas were significantly greater in the FGD group.
Group comparisons of callosal fiber tract integrity. Significantly lower fiber tract integrity compared to HC is highlighted in bold. Data are presented as mean (± SD).
| Fractional anisotropy (FA) | Mean diffusivity (10− 3 mm2/s) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HC | PD | FGD | HC | PD | FGD | |
| Genu | 0.42 (0.03) | 0.41 (0.05) | 0.667 (0.05) | 0.694 (0.03) | ||
| PreSMA | 0.41 (0.07) | 0.36 (0.08) | 0.33 (0.07) | 0.63 (0.05) | ||
| SMA | 0.45 (0.08) | 0.41 (0.09) | 0.40 (0.14) | 0.614 (0.05) | ||
| M1 | 0.49 (0.05) | 0.43 (0.08) | 0.605 (0.05) | |||
| S1 | 0.47 (0.05) | 0.607 (0.04) | ||||
P < 0.05.
P < 0.01.
P < 0.001.
Fig. 3A) Those with FGD had significantly lower tract volume compared to their HC (**P < 0.01) and PD counterparts (***P < 0.001). B) Whole-brain, TBSS regression analysis identifying white matter associated with stride width in participants with FGD. P < 0.05, TFCE-corrected (X,Y,Z = 0,19,3). Significant correlation between genu fiber tract microstructural integrity (FA) and stride width in people with FGD (r = − 0.67; P = 0.017), but not people with PD (r = − 0.24), nor for HC (r = − 0.05).
Associations between callosal tract microstructural integrity (FA) and clinical, cognitive and mobility measures. Significant associations are highlighted in bold.
| Fiber tracts | MDS – UPDRS III | PIGD | MoCA | SCOPA-COG | Stride width | Gait velocity | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HC | PD | FGD | HC | PD | FGD | HC | PD | FGD | HC | PD | FGD | HC | PD | FGD | HC | PD | FGD | |
| Genu | N/A | − 0.38 | − 0.12 | N/A | − 0.49 | 0.58 | 0.36 | 0.11 | 0.58 | 0.37 | − 0.05 | − 0.24 | 0.07 | 0.33 | 0.49 | |||
| PreSMA | N/A | 0.16 | − 0.02 | N/A | − 0.26 | − 0.60 | 0.13 | 0.30 | 0.06 | − 0.19 | 0.42 | 0.32 | − 0.15 | − 0.51 | − 0.51 | − 0.19 | 0.28 | 0.49 |
| SMA | N/A | 0.23 | − 0.50 | N/A | − 0.17 | − 0.36 | 0.36 | 0.17 | − 0.11 | 0.37 | 0.29 | 0.46 | − 0.35 | − 0.39 | − 0.13 | 0.15 | 0.28 | 0.05 |
| M1 | N/A | − 0.12 | − 0.15 | N/A | − 0.40 | − 0.51 | − 0.13 | 0.30 | − 0.03 | − 0.18 | 0.48 | 0.47 | − 0.27 | 0.02 | − 0.32 | 0.32 | 0.59 | 0.37 |
| S1 | N/A | − 0.35 | 0.01 | N/A | − 0.39 | − 0.55 | − 0.35 | 0.20 | − 0.13 | − 0.19 | 0.40 | 0.51 | − 0.05 | 0.37 | − 0.36 | 0.45 | 0.60 | 0.35 |
P < 0.05.