Literature DB >> 27103638

Factor Structure and Construct Validity of the Worker Role Self-Assessment (WRS) When Used for People With Psychiatric Disabilities in Sweden.

Mona Eklund1, Martin Bäckström2.   

Abstract

A self-report instrument assessing work-related factors among people with psychiatric disabilities would be useful when trying to match possible employment or prevocational opportunities with people's desires and capacities. The aim of this study was to explore the factor structure, internal consistency, and construct and criterion validity of the Worker Role Self-Assessment (WRS) in this group as well as possible floor and ceiling effects. The participants were 283 clients from day centers for people with psychiatric disabilities and from outpatient units for people with psychosis. They completed the WRS and instruments selected to assess construct validity in terms of convergent (motivation for work and current activity level as reference variables) and discriminant validity (quality of life and self-rated health as reference variables). Two factors were identified, one tapping beliefs in a future worker role and one reflecting current capacities and routines. The internal consistency for the scale as a whole was good at 0.84. The factor reflecting a future worker role correlated as expected with the reference variables used to assess convergent and discriminant validity, whereas current capacities and routines showed a moderate association with quality of life and self-rated health, assumed to indicate discriminant validity. Criterion validity was shown in that those who had recent work experiences scored higher than the others on WRS. No floor or ceiling effects were identified. The findings indicate acceptable psychometric properties of the WRS. Further development is still warranted, however; the factor solution needs to be replicated and the construct validity should be further established.
© The Author(s) 2016.

Entities:  

Keywords:  activity; convergent validity; discriminant validity; productivity; psychometrics

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27103638     DOI: 10.1177/0163278716643825

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eval Health Prof        ISSN: 0163-2787            Impact factor:   2.651


  3 in total

1.  Staff ratings of occupational engagement among people with severe mental illness - psychometric properties of a screening tool in the day center context.

Authors:  Mona Eklund; Ulrika Bejerholm
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 2.655

2.  Work experiences, resources, and beliefs among vulnerable subgroups of mental health care users.

Authors:  Mona Eklund; Jan-Åke Jansson; Lisa Eklund; Parvin Pooremamali; A Birgitta Gunnarsson
Journal:  Work       Date:  2021

3.  A cross-sectional study addressing the importance of work and other everyday activities for well-being among people with mental illness: does additional vulnerability matter?

Authors:  Lisa Eklund; A Birgitta Gunnarsson; Jan-Åke Jansson; Parvin Pooremamali; Mona Eklund
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2021-07-31       Impact factor: 3.630

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.