Literature DB >> 27103512

Phase II Trial of SBRT for Stage I NSCLC: Survival, Local Control, and Lung Function at 36 Months.

Arturo Navarro-Martin1, Samantha Aso2, Jon Cacicedo3, Maria Arnaiz4, Valentin Navarro5, Samuel Rosales6, Rodolfo de Blas7, Ricard Ramos8, Ferran Guedea4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The long-term impact of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) on respiratory function in patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has not been well studied. The aim of this phase II trial was to assess local control, survival, and lung function at 36 months after treatment.
METHODS: From July 2008 to February 2012, 42 patients in whom inoperable NSCLC with peripheral lesions was diagnosed were consecutively enrolled. Lung function testing included measurement of forced expiratory vital capacity, forced expiratory volume in 1 second, and diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide. All lung function parameters were registered at baseline and evaluated prospectively after SBRT every 6 months for 2 years and annually thereafter.
RESULTS: Of the 42 initial patients, four were excluded. At 36 months after SBRT, 22 patients were still evaluable (12 deaths and four patients lost to follow-up). At 36 months, the rate of local control was 94%. At 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively, overall survival rates were 92%, 75%, and 66%. Median overall survival was 57 months. Grade (G) 3 acute toxicity was observed in four patients (10%). Chronic G1 toxicity was observed in all 38 cases (100%), with the most common type being pneumonitis (26 patients [68%]). The mean lung function parameters at baseline and at 36 months after treatment were as follows: forced expiratory vital capacity 83% versus 79%; forced expiratory volume in 1 second 62% versus 57%; and diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide 54% versus 54%. These changes were not significant.
CONCLUSIONS: In this trial, local control and survival rates after SBRT were very good. Treatment with SBRT had no significant impact on lung function at 36 months. These findings provide further support for the use of SBRT as a radical treatment for NSCLC. Lung toxicity is minimal, even in patients with poor pulmonary function before treatment.
Copyright © 2016 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NSCLC; Pulmonary function text; SABR; SBRT

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27103512     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2016.03.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Oncol        ISSN: 1556-0864            Impact factor:   15.609


  21 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of outcomes following stereotactic ablative radiotherapy in the treatment of early-stage primary lung cancer.

Authors:  Patrick Murray; Kevin Franks; Gerard G Hanna
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  The TNM 8 M1b and M1c classification for non-small cell lung cancer in a cohort of patients with brain metastases.

Authors:  C Nieder; M Hintz; O Oehlke; A Bilger; A L Grosu
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 3.  Comparison of particle beam therapy and stereotactic body radiotherapy for early stage non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and hypothesis-generating meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alexander Chi; Haiquan Chen; Sijin Wen; Haijuan Yan; Zhongxing Liao
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 6.280

Review 4.  A guide for managing patients with stage I NSCLC: deciding between lobectomy, segmentectomy, wedge, SBRT and ablation-part 4: systematic review of evidence involving SBRT and ablation.

Authors:  Henry S Park; Frank C Detterbeck; David C Madoff; Brett C Bade; Ulas Kumbasar; Vincent J Mase; Andrew X Li; Justin D Blasberg; Gavitt A Woodard; Whitney S Brandt; Roy H Decker
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 3.005

5.  A multi-institutional analysis of fractionated versus single-fraction stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in the treatment of primary lung tumors: a comparison between two antipodal fractionations.

Authors:  F Alongi; L Nicosia; V Figlia; V De Sanctis; R Mazzola; N Giaj-Levra; C Reverberi; M Valeriani; M F Osti
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2021-04-10       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 6.  Quality of Life After Stereotactic Body Radiation therapy Versus Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery in Early stage Non-small Cell Lung Cancer. Is there Enough Data to Make a Recommendation?

Authors:  O Leaman-Alcibar; C Cigarral; C Déniz; I Romero-Palomar; A Navarro-Martin
Journal:  J Clin Transl Res       Date:  2021-04-22

Review 7.  Organs at Risk Considerations for Thoracic Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy: What Is Safe for Lung Parenchyma?

Authors:  Feng-Ming Spring Kong; Vitali Moiseenko; Jing Zhao; Michael T Milano; Ling Li; Andreas Rimner; Shiva Das; X Allen Li; Moyed Miften; ZhongXing Liao; Mary Martel; Soren M Bentzen; Andrew Jackson; Jimm Grimm; Lawrence B Marks; Ellen Yorke
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2018-11-26       Impact factor: 8.013

8.  Systemic Inflammation Biomarkers Predict Survival in Patients of Early Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy - A Single Center Experience.

Authors:  Hui Luo; Hong Ge; Yingying Cui; Jiangong Zhang; Ruitai Fan; Anping Zheng; Xiaoli Zheng; Yanan Sun
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 4.207

9.  Early stage lung cancer survival after wedge resection and stereotactic body radiation.

Authors:  Emanuela Taioli; Wil Lieberman-Cribbin; Shoshana Rosenzweig; Maaike A G van Gerwen; Bian Liu; Raja M Flores
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.895

10.  Helical Therapy is Safe for Lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Despite Limitations in Achieving Sharp Dose Gradients.

Authors:  Neha P Amin; Adrian Nalichowski; Shauna Campbell; Jal Hyder; Robyn Spink; Andre A Konski; Michael Dominello
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-11-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.