BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Assessment of nursing genomic competency is critical given increasing genomic applications to health care. The study aims were to determine the test-retest reliability of the Genetics and Genomics in Nursing Practice Survey (GGNPS), which measures this competency, and to revise the survey accordingly. METHODS: Registered nurses (n = 232) working at 2 Magnet-designated hospitals participating in a multiinstitutional genomic competency study completed the GGNPS. Cohen's kappa and weighted kappa were used to measure the agreement of item responses between Time 1 and Time 2. Survey items were revised based on the results. RESULTS: Mean agreement for the instrument was 0.407 (range = 0.150-1.000). Moderate agreement or higher was achieved in 39% of the items. CONCLUSIONS: GGNPS test-retest reliability was not optimal, and the instrument was refined based on the study findings. Further testing of the revised instrument is planned to assess the instrument performance.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Assessment of nursing genomic competency is critical given increasing genomic applications to health care. The study aims were to determine the test-retest reliability of the Genetics and Genomics in Nursing Practice Survey (GGNPS), which measures this competency, and to revise the survey accordingly. METHODS: Registered nurses (n = 232) working at 2 Magnet-designated hospitals participating in a multiinstitutional genomic competency study completed the GGNPS. Cohen's kappa and weighted kappa were used to measure the agreement of item responses between Time 1 and Time 2. Survey items were revised based on the results. RESULTS: Mean agreement for the instrument was 0.407 (range = 0.150-1.000). Moderate agreement or higher was achieved in 39% of the items. CONCLUSIONS: GGNPS test-retest reliability was not optimal, and the instrument was refined based on the study findings. Further testing of the revised instrument is planned to assess the instrument performance.
Authors: Alfred O Berg; Macaran A Baird; Jeffrey R Botkin; Deborah A Driscoll; Paul A Fishman; Peter D Guarino; Robert A Hiatt; Gail P Jarvik; Sandra Millon-Underwood; Thomas M Morgan; John J Mulvihill; Toni I Pollin; Selma R Schimmel; Michael Edward Stefanek; William M Vollmer; Janet K Williams Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2009-12-15 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Kathleen A Calzone; Jean Jenkins; Nick Nicol; Heather Skirton; W Gregory Feero; Eric D Green Journal: J Nurs Scholarsh Date: 2013-01-31 Impact factor: 3.176
Authors: Kathleen A Calzone; Jean Jenkins; Jan Yates; Georgie Cusack; Gwenyth R Wallen; David J Liewehr; Seth M Steinberg; Colleen McBride Journal: J Nurs Scholarsh Date: 2012-12 Impact factor: 3.176
Authors: Emma Kurnat-Thoma; Mei R Fu; Wendy A Henderson; Joachim G Voss; Marilyn J Hammer; Janet K Williams; Kathleen Calzone; Yvette P Conley; Angela Starkweather; Michael T Weaver; S Pamela K Shiao; Bernice Coleman Journal: Nurs Outlook Date: 2021-01-22 Impact factor: 3.250
Authors: Khadijah E Abdallah; Kathleen A Calzone; Jean F Jenkins; Melissa E Moss; Sherrill L Sellers; Vence L Bonham Journal: Ethn Dis Date: 2019-01-17 Impact factor: 1.847
Authors: Sherrill L Sellers; Melissa E Moss; Kathleen Calzone; Khadijah E Abdallah; Jean F Jenkins; Vence L Bonham Journal: J Nurs Scholarsh Date: 2016-09-27 Impact factor: 3.176