Literature DB >> 27103233

DNA sequence-dependent ionic currents in ultra-small solid-state nanopores.

Jeffrey Comer1, Aleksei Aksimentiev2.   

Abstract

Measurements of ionic currents through nanopores partially blocked by DNA have emerged as a powerful method for characterization of the DNA nucleotide sequence. Although the effect of the nucleotide sequence on the nanopore blockade current has been experimentally demonstrated, prediction and interpretation of such measurements remain a formidable challenge. Using atomic resolution computational approaches, here we show how the sequence, molecular conformation, and pore geometry affect the blockade ionic current in model solid-state nanopores. We demonstrate that the blockade current from a DNA molecule is determined by the chemical identities and conformations of at least three consecutive nucleotides. We find the blockade currents produced by the nucleotide triplets to vary considerably with their nucleotide sequences despite having nearly identical molecular conformations. Encouragingly, we find blockade current differences as large as 25% for single-base substitutions in ultra small (1.6 nm × 1.1 nm cross section; 2 nm length) solid-state nanopores. Despite the complex dependence of the blockade current on the sequence and conformation of the DNA triplets, we find that, under many conditions, the number of thymine bases is positively correlated with the current, whereas the number of purine bases and the presence of both purines and pyrimidines in the triplet are negatively correlated with the current. Based on these observations, we construct a simple theoretical model that relates the ion current to the base content of a solid-state nanopore. Furthermore, we show that compact conformations of DNA in narrow pores provide the greatest signal-to-noise ratio for single base detection, whereas reduction of the nanopore length increases the ionic current noise. Thus, the sequence dependence of the nanopore blockade current can be theoretically rationalized, although the predictions will likely need to be customized for each nanopore type.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27103233      PMCID: PMC4860951          DOI: 10.1039/c6nr01061j

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nanoscale        ISSN: 2040-3364            Impact factor:   7.790


  71 in total

1.  Identifying single bases in a DNA oligomer with electron tunnelling.

Authors:  Shuo Huang; Jin He; Shuai Chang; Peiming Zhang; Feng Liang; Shengqin Li; Michael Tuchband; Alexander Fuhrmann; Robert Ros; Stuart Lindsay
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2010-11-14       Impact factor: 39.213

2.  Identification of single nucleotides in MoS2 nanopores.

Authors:  Jiandong Feng; Ke Liu; Roman D Bulushev; Sergey Khlybov; Dumitru Dumcenco; Andras Kis; Aleksandra Radenovic
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 39.213

3.  Orientation discrimination of single-stranded DNA inside the alpha-hemolysin membrane channel.

Authors:  Jérôme Mathé; Aleksei Aksimentiev; David R Nelson; Klaus Schulten; Amit Meller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-08-19       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Noise in solid-state nanopores.

Authors:  R M M Smeets; U F Keyser; N H Dekker; C Dekker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  DNA Translocation in Nanometer Thick Silicon Nanopores.

Authors:  Julio A Rodríguez-Manzo; Matthew Puster; Adrien Nicolaï; Vincent Meunier; Marija Drndić
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 15.881

6.  Water Mediates Recognition of DNA Sequence via Ionic Current Blockade in a Biological Nanopore.

Authors:  Swati Bhattacharya; Jejoong Yoo; Aleksei Aksimentiev
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 15.881

7.  Atomically thin molybdenum disulfide nanopores with high sensitivity for DNA translocation.

Authors:  Ke Liu; Jiandong Feng; Andras Kis; Aleksandra Radenovic
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 15.881

Review 8.  The potential and challenges of nanopore sequencing.

Authors:  Daniel Branton; David W Deamer; Andre Marziali; Hagan Bayley; Steven A Benner; Thomas Butler; Massimiliano Di Ventra; Slaven Garaj; Andrew Hibbs; Xiaohua Huang; Stevan B Jovanovich; Predrag S Krstic; Stuart Lindsay; Xinsheng Sean Ling; Carlos H Mastrangelo; Amit Meller; John S Oliver; Yuriy V Pershin; J Michael Ramsey; Robert Riehn; Gautam V Soni; Vincent Tabard-Cossa; Meni Wanunu; Matthew Wiggin; Jeffery A Schloss
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 54.908

9.  A low-noise solid-state nanopore platform based on a highly insulating substrate.

Authors:  Min-Hyun Lee; Ashvani Kumar; Kyeong-Beom Park; Seong-Yong Cho; Hyun-Mi Kim; Min-Cheol Lim; Young-Rok Kim; Ki-Bum Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Hydroxymethyluracil modifications enhance the flexibility and hydrophilicity of double-stranded DNA.

Authors:  Spencer Carson; James Wilson; Aleksei Aksimentiev; Peter R Weigele; Meni Wanunu
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  7 in total

1.  Large-Scale Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Cellular Compartments.

Authors:  Eric Wilson; John Vant; Jacob Layton; Ryan Boyd; Hyungro Lee; Matteo Turilli; Benjamín Hernández; Sean Wilkinson; Shantenu Jha; Chitrak Gupta; Daipayan Sarkar; Abhishek Singharoy
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

2.  Single-Stranded DNA Translocation Recordings through Solid-State Nanopores on Glass Chips at 10 MHz Measurement Bandwidth.

Authors:  Chen-Chi Chien; Siddharth Shekar; David J Niedzwiecki; Kenneth L Shepard; Marija Drndić
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 15.881

3.  Chasing a Protein's Tail: Detection of Polypeptide Translocation through Nanopores.

Authors:  Jeffrey Comer
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Colloquium: Ionic phenomena in nanoscale pores through 2D materials.

Authors:  Subin Sahu; Michael Zwolak
Journal:  Rev Mod Phys       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 54.494

5.  Rapid and Accurate Determination of Nanopore Ionic Current Using a Steric Exclusion Model.

Authors:  James Wilson; Kumar Sarthak; Wei Si; Luyu Gao; Aleksei Aksimentiev
Journal:  ACS Sens       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 7.711

6.  Ionic current magnetic fields in 3D finite-length nanopores and nanoslits.

Authors:  Seyed Ali Tabatabaei; Abraham Mansouri; Ali Tarokh; Seyed Farshid Chini
Journal:  Eur Phys J Plus       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 3.911

7.  Conic shapes have higher sensitivity than cylindrical ones in nanopore DNA sequencing.

Authors:  Bin Tu; Shiyang Bai; Benzhuo Lu; Qiaojun Fang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.