Literature DB >> 27102989

Sero-epidemiological assessment of Chlamydia trachomatis infection and sub-fertility in Samoan women.

S Menon1, S H Stansfield1, M Walsh2, E Hope3, L Isaia4, A A Righarts2, T Niupulusu5, S V A Temese6, L Iosefa-Siitia7, L Auvaa3, S A Tapelu8, M F Motu7, T Suaalii-Sauni9, P Timms10, P C Hill2, W M Huston11,12,13.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In our recent village-based cross-sectional study, the prevalence of nucleic acid amplification technique (NAAT) diagnosed Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) in sexually active Samoan women was very high (36 %), and test positivity was associated with sub-fertility. We conducted a serological and epidemiological analysis in these participants to identify if serological data can provide further insight into the potential contribution of CT to sub-fertility in this population.
METHODS: Serological prediction of CT associated sub-fertility was conducted using a series of commercial tests. The correlation between fertility or sub-fertility, behavioral factors, and serologically predicted CT associated sub-fertility was determined.
RESULTS: A positive antibody reaction against the Chlamydia Major Outer Membrane Protein (MOMP) was significantly associated with sub-fertility, with 50 % of infertile women being positive. Serum IgG and IgA antibodies against MOMP correlated with current infection measured by urine NAAT, suggesting longer term infections are common in this population. Chlamydia pneumoniae antibodies were frequently detected in this population (84 %), and unexpectedly, were significantly associated with sub-fertility.
CONCLUSIONS: The high prevalence of chlamydial infection and of positive chlamydial sub-fertility results suggests that CT is an important and frequent contributory factor to sub-fertility in this population.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chlamydia; Pacific islands; diagnosis; female sub-fertility; samoa; serology

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27102989      PMCID: PMC4839085          DOI: 10.1186/s12879-016-1508-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Infect Dis        ISSN: 1471-2334            Impact factor:   3.090


Background

Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) is the most common bacterial sexually transmitted infection (STI) in the world. The infection can result in the development of serious sequelae such as pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), ectopic pregnancy and tubal factor infertility (TFI) in women. The reported prevalence of CT infection is in the range 1.4–8.7 % when the general population in high income countries is screened [1-3]. The prevalence of CT infection in Samoa was previously estimated by Sullivan et al. [4] to be 30.9 % based on antenatal screening. Similarly, in women who attended antenatal clinics between 2004 and 2005 in the Pacific Islands (Fiji, Kiribati, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Tonga, and Vanuatu), CT prevalence was 26.1 % in women under 25 years old, and 11.9 % in women over 25 [5]. The proportion of infertility attributable to CT in the Samoan population is not known. Such infertility results from tissue damage to the fallopian tubes (tubal factor infertility, TFI) that remains after the active infection is cleared, meaning that diagnosis using nucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT) is not necessarily suitable. There are numerous serological or chlamydia antibody tests (CAT) that have been developed to diagnose CT infertility, that have been validated on cohorts of women with evidence of tubal damage detected by hysterosalpingography or laparoscopy [6-11]. In a meta-analysis of published evaluations of various assays, Broeze and co-workers identified that micro immune-fluorescence (MIF) was the most sensitive, but relatively low in specificity [6]. In the same study the MEDAC and ANIlabsystems enzyme linked immunosorbant assays (ELISA) appeared to most specific, although less sensitive than MIF, to diagnose women with uni or bi-lateral tubal damage detected by surgical or sonographic technologies [6]. However, a proportion of women with infertility and who are serologically positive by CAT have no detectable tubal blockage but still require IVF (in vitro fertilization) to conceive, and this could be at least partially due to tubal damage not detectable by the current surgical or sonographic methods [7, 12–14]. In lower and middle income countries (LMIC) studies generally report higher prevalence of CT in infertile or sub-fertile women (39-55 %), although the prevalence of CT infection in fertile women is also generally high [15-17]. We recently reported a high prevalence (36.0 % by NAAT) of CT in Samoan women using community-based screening and survey of sexually active women aged 18–29 years having unprotected sex, and current infection was associated with women who were defined as being sub-fertile [14, 18]. Here, we conducted a serological study to evaluate the prevalence of CT associated sub-fertility in these same women.

Methods

The study design and sampling protocol has been previously reported [15, 18]. Women (n = 239) were recruited into a cross-sectional study on CT and sub-fertility from the Pacific nation of Samoa during 2011. Participant inclusion criteria were age between 18 and 29 years, living in the village for at least a year and being sexually active without using any forms of contraception (including condoms, birth control pills, or other forms of contraception) for at least a year. Women were excluded if they had a medical condition, or had undergone a procedure that made it impossible to become pregnant. Participants provided informed written consent, completed an interviewer-led questionnaire and provided biological samples. The nurse who conducted the interview asked the sexual behavioral questions using socially acceptable language and used a two step approach to gauge sexual behavior (as previously described) [18]. The questionnaire responses were used to assign women to ‘sub-fertile’ (or otherwise ‘fertile’). Sub-fertility was defined as at least 12 months of unprotected intercourse without conceiving a pregnancy [18]. The NAAT results have been previously analysed and presented [18], all participants provided a urine specimen that was analysed for CT infection status using the BD ProbeTec ET assay in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions and using positive and negative controls (BD Biosciences, USA) [18]. The participant sera were tested for CT antibodies using the following commercial ELISAs: CT-IgG ELISA-plus MEDAC (peptides from the MOMP protein, referred to as MEDAC MOMP, used to diagnose past or current infection), cHSP60-IgG ELISA MEDAC (cSHP60 protein), ANIlabsystems CT IgG (peptides from MOMP, marketed to diagnose CT infertility), CT IgA ELISA MEDAC (used to diagnose current CT infection), Chlamydia pneumoniae (CP)-IgG-ELISA MEDAC (used to diagnose current CP infection) (summarized in Table 1). The assay positive or negative results in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions were used for this study (positive, negative, unequivocal (excluded), invalid (excluded)). Titres were not included in this study as they are not part of these commercial tests. All sera were tested with all assays, however, any that were unequivocal or invalid more than once were excluded from the data for that assay and any participants that did not have a complete dataset and valid test result in every assay were completely excluded from the analysis in Table 2 and Fig. 2. The serological testing of CT associated sub-fertility is difficult because the gold standard (MIF) has low specificity leading to high false positives (although it had the highest accuracy using area under the curve), but is reported to be highly subjective and labor intensive [6]. Therefore we chose to test the population using ELISA as we prioritised highest specificity in order to indicate the amount of CT associated sub-fertility in Samoa, and a format that could enable us to compare several tests in a timely manner. We selected multiple ELISAs to compare the different IgG responses and we also included IgA to indicate how many of the infections were recent. Finally, we included a Chlamydia pneumoniae ELISA to enable comparison of the sero-prevalence of a related and very common pathogen.
Table 1

Commercial serological assays and previously reported sensitivity and specificity

Assay nameAntigenStudy reference nameSensitivitySpecificityDetected groupRef
MEDACCT-IgG ELISA-plus MEDACMOMPMEDAC MOMP55 %87 %Women with infertility (n = 315)[7]
cHSP60-IgG ELISA MEDACcHSP60MEDAC cHSP6069 %93 %Women with TFI (n = 70)[22]
MEDAC IgG CT pELISA and cHSP60 IgG ELISACombination of both assaysMEDAC Infertile[22]
ANIlabsystems CT IgGMOMP peptidesANIlab91 %84 %CT NAAT diagnosed infection and infertility (n = 303)[16]
CT IgA ELISA MEDACMOMP peptidesMEDAC IgANAAT diagnosed current infection[23]
C. pneumoniae-IgG-ELISA MEDACMOMP peptidesMEDAC Cpn91.3 %93.3 %Current pneumonia and MIF positive status for C. pneumoniae [24]
Table 2

Participant data included/excluded in the Table 3 analysis

VariableIncluded, nExcluded, nOR (95 % C.I.) P value for OR
Age
 18–2497481
 25–2964291.11 (0.63–1.94)0.720
Smoking
 Never129591
 Ex-smoker/current33180.84 (0.44–1.61)0.600
Fertility status
 Sub-fertile59281
 Fertile103491.00 (0.57–1.75)0.990

Comparison of Age, smoking and fertility status for participants included or excluded in the study. Participants excluded had no statistical difference in age, smoking or fertility status (P > 0.05)

Fig. 2

Venn diagram to demonstrate concordance between serological assays and CT NAAT results. The diagram shows the number of participants positive in each of the assays and those who were positive in more than one assay. The two MOMP assays (MEDAC IgG and ANIlab) and NAAT results showed considerable concordance. The samples that were negative in all assays are also indicated on the figure, only the 162 samples that had a valid result in all of these assays are included in the Venn diagram

Commercial serological assays and previously reported sensitivity and specificity Participant data included/excluded in the Table 3 analysis
Table 3

Analysis of demographic factors and serological results that associate with sub-fertility

VariableSub-fertile, nFertile, n2a OR (95 % C.I.) P value for OR
Age
 18–2447501
 25–2912530.24 (0.11–0.51)<0.01
BMI
 Normal Weight12211
 Overweight27350.74 (0.31–1.80)0.498
 Obese20470.74 (0.31–1.80)0.512
Smoking
 Never46831
 Ex-smoker/current13201.17 (0.53–2.57)0.691
MEDAC Infertile
 Negative34721
 Positive25311.71 (0.88–3.33)0.115
MEDAC MOMP
 Negative28661
 Positive31371.97 (1.03–3.78)0.040
MEDAC cHSP60
 Negative25411
 Positive34620.9 (0.47-1.72)0.749
MEDAC IgA
 Negative49891
 Positive10141.3 (0.55-3.14)0.563
ANIlab
 Negative29591
 Positive30441.39 (0.73–2.64)0.318
MEDAC CP
 Negative2221
 Positive57817.74 (1.75–34.210.007
CT Infection (NAAT)
 Negative28731
 Positive31302.69 (1.39–5.24)0.003

aThis table only includes women who had consistent results in all assays (n = 162), 59 sub-fertile and 103 fertile women

Comparison of Age, smoking and fertility status for participants included or excluded in the study. Participants excluded had no statistical difference in age, smoking or fertility status (P > 0.05) All statistical analyses were conducted in R statistical environment (3.0.3) using the ‘EpiR (0.9-57) and 'metafor' package (1.9-2) for calculation and presentation (forest plots) of odds ratios (OR). All analyses were conducted to measure the association of assay results with sub-fertility. OR and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were calculated with restricted maximum likelihood estimates of error.

Results

Antibody test results for CT associated sub-fertility

Two hundred thirty-nine women meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria participated in the study; 90 were defined as being sub-fertile and 149 were defined as fertile with a history of having had a pregnancy. The association of CT with sub-fertility was analysed using each of the commercial serological assays. As shown in Fig. 1a, women who were sub-fertile were significantly more likely to have a positive serological reaction in the MEDAC MOMP assay (p = 0.045). 42 out of 82 sub-fertile women were positive in the MEDAC MOMP assay, whereas 52 out of a total of 139 fertile women were positive. It is important to note that 34 sub-fertile women have been excluded for this assay from Fig. 1a because they had unequivocal results. One of the most common immunological reactions that was associated with infertility in previous studies [9, 12], an antibody response to cHSP60, was not significantly associated with sub-fertility: the sero-prevalence of antibodies to cHSP60 did not differ based on fertility with 57 % of both infertile and fertile women being positive (44 out of 76 sub-fertile women were positive and 73 out of 129 fertile women were positive). The MEDAC Infertile assay, which is recommended by the manufacturer to be a positive reaction in both the MEDAC MOMP and MEDAC cHSP60 assays, was not significantly associated with sub-fertility in this study (in the infertile group 29 women were positive out of 74 total who had results in the assay, and 36 were positive out of a total of 127 women with reportable results in the fertile group).
Fig. 1

Analysis of the association of serological responses to Chlamydia with fertility and CT infection status. a. The figure shows Forest plots and Odds Ratio of the association of a positive reaction in the serological assay listed to the right with being infertile. The assay is indicated in the left column. The number of participants that were positive or negative in the serum assay(s) according to their fertile or infertile status are shown on the figure. All 239 participant specimens were tested in each assay. Samples that were unequivocal or not reproducible upon multiple testing were excluded for each assay and these are indicated in the column titled invalid/unequivocal on the table. b. The number of participants positive or negative in each serological assay, grouped according to also being positive or negative for current CT infection by urine NAAT (Chlamydia +/−) are shown on the figure. OR with 95 % CI and P values are indicated at the right of the figures

Analysis of the association of serological responses to Chlamydia with fertility and CT infection status. a. The figure shows Forest plots and Odds Ratio of the association of a positive reaction in the serological assay listed to the right with being infertile. The assay is indicated in the left column. The number of participants that were positive or negative in the serum assay(s) according to their fertile or infertile status are shown on the figure. All 239 participant specimens were tested in each assay. Samples that were unequivocal or not reproducible upon multiple testing were excluded for each assay and these are indicated in the column titled invalid/unequivocal on the table. b. The number of participants positive or negative in each serological assay, grouped according to also being positive or negative for current CT infection by urine NAAT (Chlamydia +/−) are shown on the figure. OR with 95 % CI and P values are indicated at the right of the figures The overall IgG sero-positivity to CT in this population was 43 % according to the MEDAC MOMP results, and 50 % according to the ANIlab assay. The numbers reported in Fig. 1 vary depending on the number of women that had consistent reportable results in the assay (i.e. we did not include unequivocal or invalid results, these are indicated to the left of the figure). We included testing for a common respiratory pathogen (Chlamydia pneumoniae) to provide an indication of serological responses in our population tested. Women who were sub-fertile were significantly more likely to have a positive reaction in MEDAC CP assay (p < 0.001) (Fig. 1a). The overall presence of sero-positivity to this pathogen (CP) was 86 %. A positive urine NAAT result did not correlate with a positive CP serological result, supporting that this assay is not likely to be detecting CT cross reactivity. Although, pairwise analysis did show that MEDAC MOMP positivity significantly correlated with MEDAC CP (chisel p = 0.042), meaning that women positive in MEDAC MOMP were more likely to be positive in MEDAC CP (OR 3.63 [95 % CI: 0.92–21.11]). We previously reported that the current infection by urine NAAT was 36 % in this cohort [18], therefore, we evaluated if the serological results correlate with current infection status. Women who were NAAT positive were significantly more likely to be positive in the serological assays for CT by all of assays tested (Fig. 1b). The high association of IgG against MOMP and cHSP60 and current infection by urine NAAT in this cohort could imply these are longer term infections, consistent with the lack of STI screening and treatment programs in this country. A positive result in the MEDAC IgA significantly correlated with NAAT positive status (Fig. 1b) (p = 0.004). This higher frequency of IgG (compared to IgA) correlating with NAAT diagnosed current infection further supports the possibility that in this population there are frequent repeat or longer term infections, given that IgA tends to be produced early and in primary infections. In the evaluation of demographic factors in relation to subfertility and serological results, we only included data for participants that had a recordable result in every test and answered every demographic question (n = 162). The details of the participants excluded from this analysis are provided in Table 2, and there were no significant differences in the sub-fertility status or other factors in those excluded compared to those included. Age (older women were more likely to be fertile, p < 0.010), MEDAC MOMP (p = 0.040), NAAT positive for CT (p = 0.003) and MEDAC CP (p = 0.007) were all significant factors that associated with sub-fertility in this subset of participants (Table 3). Analysis of demographic factors and serological results that associate with sub-fertility aThis table only includes women who had consistent results in all assays (n = 162), 59 sub-fertile and 103 fertile women We used the same subset of specimens to assess test concordance. As shown in the Venn diagram (Fig. 2) there was often concordance between the serological assays and NAAT results, particularly between NAAT, MEDAC MOMP, and ANIlab. This supports the notion that these assays are reporting serological responses to CT and are not likely to be a consequence of non-specific reactivity. Venn diagram to demonstrate concordance between serological assays and CT NAAT results. The diagram shows the number of participants positive in each of the assays and those who were positive in more than one assay. The two MOMP assays (MEDAC IgG and ANIlab) and NAAT results showed considerable concordance. The samples that were negative in all assays are also indicated on the figure, only the 162 samples that had a valid result in all of these assays are included in the Venn diagram

Discussion

The results of this study imply that up to half (51 % infertile women positive for MEDAC MOMP) of women who are sub-fertile in this population could have CT as a cause or contributing factor. To our knowledge this is one of the highest burdens of CT associated sub-fertility reported to date. This is higher than most studies report, even those conducted in fertility clinics, but is consistent with a fertility clinic study in India that found a similar prevalence [15]. This may be a reflection of the absence of routine screening and treatment for CT infections in this population. A possible limitation of our study is that the serological results may be influenced by a higher number of repeat infections given the high prevalence of infection in this population. These repeat infections may lead to higher positives in these assays which use absorbance thresholds that have been designed on clinically defined infertile cohorts, often in settings with a much lower background prevalence. The MEDAC Infertile assay was not significantly associated with sub-fertility in this study. Nevertheless, the high prevalence of cHSP60 antibodies (one of the components of the MEDAC test) could suggest that chronic infections or sequelae are high in this population. Most studies that found a significant association had TFI as the specified measure for infertility [9]. In this population we have limited knowledge of the other fertility factors as this was a village-based survey in the absence of any gynecological investigations that would normally be conducted in a fertility clinic. In addition it is of course possible, considering the sensitivities of obtaining sexual behavior information that some women were mis-classified with respect to subfertility. The amount of sexual activity was of course not the same for each woman, affecting their individual probabilities of becoming pregnant. The study findings indicated a higher fertility rate in the older ages (although the inclusion criteria were limited to the most reproductive years). The higher fertility in the older women is not that unexpected and is likely because this study is based on sexually active women who were all within the ideal reproductive age, so the longer the period of sexual activity the more likely the women are to have conceived. Alternatively, this could be explained by an increased desire of these women (25–29 year olds) to achieve pregnancy leading to increased sexual activity. It was unexpected to find a significant correlation of sero-positivity to C. pneumoniae with sub-fertility in this population. It is difficult to determine if this is actually serological cross reactivity (or a genuine association). Serology to C. pneumoniae, or the presence of the organism, has been previously found to significantly correlate with various diseases [19-21], but not with sub-fertility. One possible explanation for this finding could be that the infertile women in this population have tissue lesions or adhesions in the fallopian tube that may form a reservoir for the pathogen and perhaps the immune response to this reserve of CP may exacerbate the CT pathology that results in development of tubal sub-fertility. This persistence in the scarring site could explain the high prevalence of CP serology that, whilst significant, is not causal for sub-fertility. Alternatively, this could be a chance result. Firstly, as the prevalence of Chlamydia pneumoniae antibodies is very high (in both fertile and infertile women), statistical analysis tends to lead to an overestimation of the odds ratio. Secondly, the number of participants included in the analysis is relatively low (n = 233). MEDAC MOMP and MEDAC CP were the only assays that significantly correlated with sub-fertility, suggesting that whilst serology is a much more feasible manner to measure possible chlamydial infertility in the developing world setting the current assays may be confounded by the high prevalence, and only MEDAC MOMP may be suitable.

Conclusions

The high prevalence of C. trachomatis infections in Samoa is likely to be leading to high rates of preventable sub-fertility in this population. The results reported here using serological and epidemiological data collection indicate that CT-associated sub-fertility could be a factor for as much as half of the burden of sub-fertility in sexually active women in this reproductive age range in Samoa.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Participants provided informed written consent, completed an interviewer-led questionnaire and provided biological samples. The initial ethical approval was from National University of Samoa, Samoa National Health Service Board approval for the use of the Laboratory and staff, and the Samoa Ministry of Women approved the village based survey, and the Samoan Ministry of Health. Ethical approval was previously reported [19] and Queensland University of Technology Human Research Ethics Committee approval was also obtained (approval number 1100000276).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Availability of data and methods

All data that is not present in the publication will be made available upon request in de-identified format. The questionnaire development and details are previously presented and can be provided upon request.
  24 in total

1.  Performance of five serological chlamydia antibody tests in subfertile women.

Authors:  J A Land; A P Gijsen; A G H Kessels; M E P Slobbe; C A Bruggeman
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  Positive Chlamydia trachomatis serology result in women seeking care for infertility is a negative prognosticator for intrauterine pregnancy.

Authors:  Martin D Keltz; May-Tal Sauerbrun-Cutler; Margaret S Durante; Erin Moshier; Daniel E Stein; Eric Gonzales
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.830

3.  Isolation of Chlamydia pneumoniae from the coronary artery of a patient with coronary atherosclerosis. The Chlamydia pneumoniae/Atherosclerosis Study Group.

Authors:  J A Ramirez
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1996-12-15       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Chlamydia trachomatis IgG seropositivity is associated with lower natural conception rates in ovulatory subfertile women without visible tubal pathology.

Authors:  S F P J Coppus; J A Land; B C Opmeer; P Steures; M J C Eijkemans; P G A Hompes; P M M Bossuyt; F van der Veen; B W J Mol; J W van der Steeg
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  Previously undetected Chlamydia trachomatis infection, immunity to heat shock proteins and tubal occlusion in women undergoing in-vitro fertilization.

Authors:  S D Spandorfer; A Neuer; D LaVerda; G Byrne; H C Liu; Z Rosenwaks; S S Witkin
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Prevalence of sexually transmitted diseases and human immunodeficiency virus among women attending prenatal services in Apia, Samoa.

Authors:  E A Sullivan; Semo Koro; S Tabrizi; J Kaldor; G Poumerol; S Chen; M O'Leary; S M Garland
Journal:  Int J STD AIDS       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.359

7.  Identification and localization of Chlamydia pneumoniae in the Alzheimer's brain.

Authors:  B J Balin; H C Gérard; E J Arking; D M Appelt; P J Branigan; J T Abrams; J A Whittum-Hudson; A P Hudson
Journal:  Med Microbiol Immunol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women with secondary infertility.

Authors:  Abida Malik; Suchitra Jain; Meher Rizvi; Indu Shukla; Seema Hakim
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Chlamydia trachomatis infection as a risk factor for infertility among women in Ghana, West Africa.

Authors:  Jorn Siemer; Oliver Theile; Yaw Larbi; Peter A Fasching; K A Danso; Rolf Kreienberg; Andreas Essig
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.345

10.  Prevalence of genital Chlamydia infection in urban women of reproductive age, Nairobi, Kenya.

Authors:  Ruchika Kohli; Walter P Konya; Timona Obura; William Stones; Gunturu Revathi
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2013-02-04
View more
  9 in total

1.  Impact of the Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System on the Progression of Chlamydia trachomatis Infection to Pelvic Inflammatory Disease in a Baboon Model.

Authors:  Alison J Eastman; Ingrid L Bergin; Daniel Chai; Christine M Bassis; William LeBar; George O Oluoch; Emma R Liechty; Atunga Nyachieo; Vincent B Young; David M Aronoff; Dorothy L Patton; Jason D Bell
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 5.226

Review 2.  Advancing the public health applications of Chlamydia trachomatis serology.

Authors:  Sarah C Woodhall; Rachel J Gorwitz; Stephanie J Migchelsen; Sami L Gottlieb; Patrick J Horner; William M Geisler; Catherine Winstanley; Katrin Hufnagel; Tim Waterboer; Diana L Martin; Wilhelmina M Huston; Charlotte A Gaydos; Carolyn Deal; Magnus Unemo; J Kevin Dunbar; Kyle Bernstein
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 25.071

3.  High Plasmid Gene Protein 3 (Pgp3) Chlamydia trachomatis Seropositivity, Pelvic Inflammatory Disease, and Infertility Among Women, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, United States, 2013-2016.

Authors:  Gloria E Anyalechi; Jaeyoung Hong; Damien C Danavall; Diana L Martin; Sarah E Gwyn; Patrick J Horner; Brian H Raphael; Robert D Kirkcaldy; Ellen N Kersh; Kyle T Bernstein
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 20.999

4.  Comprehensive Molecular Serology of Human Chlamydia trachomatis Infections by Peptide Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays.

Authors:  K Shamsur Rahman; Toni Darville; Ali N Russell; Catherine M O'Connell; Harold C Wiesenfeld; Sharon L Hillier; De'Ashia E Lee; Bernhard Kaltenboeck
Journal:  mSphere       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 4.389

5.  Mixed Chlamydia trachomatis Peptide Antigens Provide a Specific and Sensitive Single-Well Colorimetric Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay for Detection of Human Anti-C. trachomatis Antibodies.

Authors:  K Shamsur Rahman; Toni Darville; Harold C Wiesenfeld; Sharon L Hillier; Bernhard Kaltenboeck
Journal:  mSphere       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 4.389

6.  Evaluation of a PGP3 ELISA for surveillance of the burden of Chlamydia infection in women from Australia and Samoa.

Authors:  Rami Mazraani; Peter Timms; Philip C Hill; Tamaailau Suaalii-Sauni; Tavita Niupulusu; Seiuli V A Temese; Liai Iosefa-Siitia; Leveti Auvaa; Siuomatautu A Tapelu; Maauga F Motu; Antoinette Righarts; Michael S Walsh; Luk Rombauts; John A Allan; Patrick Horner; Wilhelmina M Huston
Journal:  Pathog Dis       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 3.166

Review 7.  Female urogenital chlamydia: Epidemiology, chlamydia on pregnancy, current diagnosis, and treatment.

Authors:  Dian Tjahyadi; Bejo Ropii; Kevin Dominique Tjandraprawira; Ida Parwati; Tono Djuwantono; Wiryawan Permadi; Tinchiu Li
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2022-03-02

8.  Chlamydial Pgp3 Seropositivity and Population-Attributable Fraction Among Women With Tubal Factor Infertility.

Authors:  Gloria E Anyalechi; Jaeyoung Hong; Robert D Kirkcaldy; Harold C Wiesenfeld; Paddy Horner; Gillian S Wills; Myra O McClure; Karen R Hammond; Catherine L Haggerty; Dmitry M Kissin; Edward W Hook; Michael P Steinkampf; Kyle Bernstein; William M Geisler
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 3.868

Review 9.  Future prospects for new vaccines against sexually transmitted infections.

Authors:  Sami L Gottlieb; Christine Johnston
Journal:  Curr Opin Infect Dis       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.915

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.