| Literature DB >> 27102989 |
S Menon1, S H Stansfield1, M Walsh2, E Hope3, L Isaia4, A A Righarts2, T Niupulusu5, S V A Temese6, L Iosefa-Siitia7, L Auvaa3, S A Tapelu8, M F Motu7, T Suaalii-Sauni9, P Timms10, P C Hill2, W M Huston11,12,13.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In our recent village-based cross-sectional study, the prevalence of nucleic acid amplification technique (NAAT) diagnosed Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) in sexually active Samoan women was very high (36 %), and test positivity was associated with sub-fertility. We conducted a serological and epidemiological analysis in these participants to identify if serological data can provide further insight into the potential contribution of CT to sub-fertility in this population.Entities:
Keywords: Chlamydia; Pacific islands; diagnosis; female sub-fertility; samoa; serology
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27102989 PMCID: PMC4839085 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-016-1508-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Infect Dis ISSN: 1471-2334 Impact factor: 3.090
Commercial serological assays and previously reported sensitivity and specificity
| Assay name | Antigen | Study reference name | Sensitivity | Specificity | Detected group | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MEDACCT-IgG ELISA-plus MEDAC | MOMP | MEDAC MOMP | 55 % | 87 % | Women with infertility (n = 315) | [ |
| cHSP60-IgG ELISA MEDAC | cHSP60 | MEDAC cHSP60 | 69 % | 93 % | Women with TFI (n = 70) | [ |
| MEDAC IgG CT pELISA and cHSP60 IgG ELISA | Combination of both assays | MEDAC Infertile | [ | |||
| ANIlabsystems CT IgG | MOMP peptides | ANIlab | 91 % | 84 % | CT NAAT diagnosed infection and infertility ( | [ |
| CT IgA ELISA MEDAC | MOMP peptides | MEDAC IgA | NAAT diagnosed current infection | [ | ||
|
| MOMP peptides | MEDAC Cpn | 91.3 % | 93.3 % | Current pneumonia and MIF positive status for | [ |
Participant data included/excluded in the Table 3 analysis
| Variable | Included, n | Excluded, n | OR (95 % C.I.) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | ||||
| 18–24 | 97 | 48 | 1 | |
| 25–29 | 64 | 29 | 1.11 (0.63–1.94) | 0.720 |
| Smoking | ||||
| Never | 129 | 59 | 1 | |
| Ex-smoker/current | 33 | 18 | 0.84 (0.44–1.61) | 0.600 |
| Fertility status | ||||
| Sub-fertile | 59 | 28 | 1 | |
| Fertile | 103 | 49 | 1.00 (0.57–1.75) | 0.990 |
Comparison of Age, smoking and fertility status for participants included or excluded in the study. Participants excluded had no statistical difference in age, smoking or fertility status (P > 0.05)
Fig. 2Venn diagram to demonstrate concordance between serological assays and CT NAAT results. The diagram shows the number of participants positive in each of the assays and those who were positive in more than one assay. The two MOMP assays (MEDAC IgG and ANIlab) and NAAT results showed considerable concordance. The samples that were negative in all assays are also indicated on the figure, only the 162 samples that had a valid result in all of these assays are included in the Venn diagram
Analysis of demographic factors and serological results that associate with sub-fertility
| Variable | Sub-fertile, n | Fertile, n2a | OR (95 % C.I.) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | ||||
| 18–24 | 47 | 50 | 1 | |
| 25–29 | 12 | 53 | 0.24 (0.11–0.51) | <0.01 |
| BMI | ||||
| Normal Weight | 12 | 21 | 1 | |
| Overweight | 27 | 35 | 0.74 (0.31–1.80) | 0.498 |
| Obese | 20 | 47 | 0.74 (0.31–1.80) | 0.512 |
| Smoking | ||||
| Never | 46 | 83 | 1 | |
| Ex-smoker/current | 13 | 20 | 1.17 (0.53–2.57) | 0.691 |
| MEDAC Infertile | ||||
| Negative | 34 | 72 | 1 | |
| Positive | 25 | 31 | 1.71 (0.88–3.33) | 0.115 |
| MEDAC MOMP | ||||
| Negative | 28 | 66 | 1 | |
| Positive | 31 | 37 | 1.97 (1.03–3.78) | 0.040 |
| MEDAC cHSP60 | ||||
| Negative | 25 | 41 | 1 | |
| Positive | 34 | 62 | 0.9 (0.47-1.72) | 0.749 |
| MEDAC IgA | ||||
| Negative | 49 | 89 | 1 | |
| Positive | 10 | 14 | 1.3 (0.55-3.14) | 0.563 |
| ANIlab | ||||
| Negative | 29 | 59 | 1 | |
| Positive | 30 | 44 | 1.39 (0.73–2.64) | 0.318 |
| MEDAC CP | ||||
| Negative | 2 | 22 | 1 | |
| Positive | 57 | 81 | 7.74 (1.75–34.21 | 0.007 |
| CT Infection (NAAT) | ||||
| Negative | 28 | 73 | 1 | |
| Positive | 31 | 30 | 2.69 (1.39–5.24) | 0.003 |
aThis table only includes women who had consistent results in all assays (n = 162), 59 sub-fertile and 103 fertile women
Fig. 1Analysis of the association of serological responses to Chlamydia with fertility and CT infection status. a. The figure shows Forest plots and Odds Ratio of the association of a positive reaction in the serological assay listed to the right with being infertile. The assay is indicated in the left column. The number of participants that were positive or negative in the serum assay(s) according to their fertile or infertile status are shown on the figure. All 239 participant specimens were tested in each assay. Samples that were unequivocal or not reproducible upon multiple testing were excluded for each assay and these are indicated in the column titled invalid/unequivocal on the table. b. The number of participants positive or negative in each serological assay, grouped according to also being positive or negative for current CT infection by urine NAAT (Chlamydia +/−) are shown on the figure. OR with 95 % CI and P values are indicated at the right of the figures