W Nijholt1, H Jager-Wittenaar, M Visser, C P van der Schans, J S M Hobbelen. 1. Willemke Nijholt, MSc. Hanze University of Applied Sciences, School of Health Care Studies, Eyssoniusplein 18, 9714 CE Groningen, The Netherlands, E-mail: w.nijholt@pl.hanze.nl, Phone number: +31.6.20 42 66 73.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Previous research has demonstrated that being both physically active and adhering a healthy diet is associated with improved cognitive functioning; however, it remains unclear whether these factors act synergistically. We investigated the synergistic association of a healthy diet and being physically active with cognitive functioning. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Data from the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam (LASA) were used. We analyzed data from 2,165 community dwelling adults who were aged 55-85 years, 56% of whom were female. Cognitive functioning was assessed by the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), an MMSE score of >26 indicates good cognitive functioning. Physical activity was assessed by the LASA Physical Activity Questionnaire and was considered sufficient if the person engaged in moderately intense physical activity ≥ 20 min/day. A healthy diet score was based on the intake of fruit, vegetables and fish. Each of the food groups was assigned a score that ranged from 1 (well below the Dutch guideline for a healthy diet) to 4 (well above the Dutch guideline for a healthy diet), and the scores were aggregated to determine a healthy diet (healthy ≥ 9 points). Multiple logistic and linear regression analyses were used to examine the (synergistic) association among physical activity, a healthy diet and cognitive functioning. All analyses were adjusted for potential chronic diseases and lifestyle confounders. RESULTS: Of all of the participants, 25% were diagnosed with a cognitive impairment (MMSE ≤26), 80% were physically active and 41% had a healthy diet. Sixty three percent of the participants both adhered to a healthy diet and were physically active. Sufficient daily physical activity (OR=2.545 p<.001) and adherence to a healthy diet (OR=1.766 p=.002) were associated with good cognitive functioning. After adjusting for confounding factors, sufficient physical activity was not significantly related to cognitive functioning (p=.163); however adherence to a healthy diet remained significantly associated with good cognitive functioning (p=.017). No interaction among sufficient physical activity, healthy diet adherence and good cognitive functioning was observed (crude: p=.401, adjusted: p=.216). CONCLUSION: The results of this cross-sectional study indicate that adherence to a healthy diet is inde-pendently related to cognitive functioning. Being physically active does not modify this association. Furthermore, these two lifestyle factors do not synergistically relate to cognitive functioning.
OBJECTIVES: Previous research has demonstrated that being both physically active and adhering a healthy diet is associated with improved cognitive functioning; however, it remains unclear whether these factors act synergistically. We investigated the synergistic association of a healthy diet and being physically active with cognitive functioning. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Data from the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam (LASA) were used. We analyzed data from 2,165 community dwelling adults who were aged 55-85 years, 56% of whom were female. Cognitive functioning was assessed by the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), an MMSE score of >26 indicates good cognitive functioning. Physical activity was assessed by the LASA Physical Activity Questionnaire and was considered sufficient if the person engaged in moderately intense physical activity ≥ 20 min/day. A healthy diet score was based on the intake of fruit, vegetables and fish. Each of the food groups was assigned a score that ranged from 1 (well below the Dutch guideline for a healthy diet) to 4 (well above the Dutch guideline for a healthy diet), and the scores were aggregated to determine a healthy diet (healthy ≥ 9 points). Multiple logistic and linear regression analyses were used to examine the (synergistic) association among physical activity, a healthy diet and cognitive functioning. All analyses were adjusted for potential chronic diseases and lifestyle confounders. RESULTS: Of all of the participants, 25% were diagnosed with a cognitive impairment (MMSE ≤26), 80% were physically active and 41% had a healthy diet. Sixty three percent of the participants both adhered to a healthy diet and were physically active. Sufficient daily physical activity (OR=2.545 p<.001) and adherence to a healthy diet (OR=1.766 p=.002) were associated with good cognitive functioning. After adjusting for confounding factors, sufficient physical activity was not significantly related to cognitive functioning (p=.163); however adherence to a healthy diet remained significantly associated with good cognitive functioning (p=.017). No interaction among sufficient physical activity, healthy diet adherence and good cognitive functioning was observed (crude: p=.401, adjusted: p=.216). CONCLUSION: The results of this cross-sectional study indicate that adherence to a healthy diet is inde-pendently related to cognitive functioning. Being physically active does not modify this association. Furthermore, these two lifestyle factors do not synergistically relate to cognitive functioning.
Authors: F B Hu; E Rimm; S A Smith-Warner; D Feskanich; M J Stampfer; A Ascherio; L Sampson; W C Willett Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 1999-02 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: F Panza; V Solfrizzi; A M Colacicco; A D'Introno; C Capurso; F Torres; A Del Parigi; S Capurso; A Capurso Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 4.022
Authors: W C Willett; L Sampson; M J Stampfer; B Rosner; C Bain; J Witschi; C H Hennekens; F E Speizer Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 1985-07 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: May A Beydoun; Jay S Kaufman; Philip D Sloane; Gerardo Heiss; Joseph Ibrahim Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2007-07-12 Impact factor: 4.022
Authors: E Laird; M C Casey; M Ward; L Hoey; C F Hughes; K McCarroll; C Cunningham; J J Strain; H McNulty; A M Molloy Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2017 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: W Li; G Youssef; E Procter-Gray; B Olendzki; T Cornish; R Hayes; L Churchill; K Kane; K Brown; M F Magee Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2017 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: M Ishikawa; Y Takemi; T Yokoyama; K Kusama; Y Fukuda; T Nakaya; M Nozue; N Yoshiike; K Yoshiba; F Hayashi; N Murayama Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2017 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: S M Robinson; K A Jameson; I Bloom; G Ntani; S R Crozier; H Syddall; E M Dennison; C R Cooper; A A Sayer Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2017 Impact factor: 4.075