Martin B Brodsky1, Debra M Suiter2, Marlís González-Fernández3, Henry J Michtalik4, Tobi B Frymark5, Rebecca Venediktov5, Tracy Schooling5. 1. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Outcomes After Critical Illness and Surgery Research Group, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD. Electronic address: brodsky@jhmi.edu. 2. College of Health Sciences, Division of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY. 3. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD. 4. Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Hospitalist Program, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD. 5. National Center for Evidence-Based Practice in Communication Disorders, American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Rockville, MD.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hospitalizations for aspiration pneumonia have doubled among older adults. Using a bedside water swallow test (WST) to screen for swallowing-related aspiration can be efficient and cost-effective for preventing additional comorbidities and mortality. We evaluated screening accuracy of bedside WSTs used to identify patients at risk for dysphagia-associated aspiration. METHODS: Sixteen online databases, Google Scholar, and known content experts through May 2015 were searched. Only prospective studies with patients ≥ 18 years of age given WST screenings validated against nasoendoscopy or videofluoroscopy were included. Data extraction used dual masked extraction and quality assessment following Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines. RESULTS: Airway response (eg, coughing/choking) with or without voice changes (eg, wet/gurgly voice quality) was used to identify aspiration during three different bedside WSTs. Pooled estimates for single sip volumes (1-5 mL) were 71% sensitive (95% CI, 63%-78%) and 90% specific (95% CI, 86%-93%). Consecutive sips of 90 to 100 mL trials were 91% sensitive (95% CI, 89%-93%) and 53% specific (95% CI, 51%-55%). Trials of progressively increasing volumes of water were 86% sensitive (95% CI, 76%-93%) and 65% specific (95% CI, 57%-73%). Airway response with voice change improved overall accuracy in identifying aspiration. CONCLUSIONS: Currently used bedside WSTs offer sufficient, although not ideal, utility in screening for aspiration. Consecutive sips with large volumes in patients who did not present with overt airway responses or voice changes appropriately ruled out risk of aspiration. Small volumes with single sips appropriately ruled in aspiration when clinical signs were present. Combining these bedside approaches may offer improved screening accuracy, but further research is warranted.
BACKGROUND: Hospitalizations for aspiration pneumonia have doubled among older adults. Using a bedside water swallow test (WST) to screen for swallowing-related aspiration can be efficient and cost-effective for preventing additional comorbidities and mortality. We evaluated screening accuracy of bedside WSTs used to identify patients at risk for dysphagia-associated aspiration. METHODS: Sixteen online databases, Google Scholar, and known content experts through May 2015 were searched. Only prospective studies with patients ≥ 18 years of age given WST screenings validated against nasoendoscopy or videofluoroscopy were included. Data extraction used dual masked extraction and quality assessment following Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines. RESULTS: Airway response (eg, coughing/choking) with or without voice changes (eg, wet/gurgly voice quality) was used to identify aspiration during three different bedside WSTs. Pooled estimates for single sip volumes (1-5 mL) were 71% sensitive (95% CI, 63%-78%) and 90% specific (95% CI, 86%-93%). Consecutive sips of 90 to 100 mL trials were 91% sensitive (95% CI, 89%-93%) and 53% specific (95% CI, 51%-55%). Trials of progressively increasing volumes of water were 86% sensitive (95% CI, 76%-93%) and 65% specific (95% CI, 57%-73%). Airway response with voice change improved overall accuracy in identifying aspiration. CONCLUSIONS: Currently used bedside WSTs offer sufficient, although not ideal, utility in screening for aspiration. Consecutive sips with large volumes in patients who did not present with overt airway responses or voice changes appropriately ruled out risk of aspiration. Small volumes with single sips appropriately ruled in aspiration when clinical signs were present. Combining these bedside approaches may offer improved screening accuracy, but further research is warranted.
Authors: Jeffrey H Kozlow; Sean M Berenholtz; Elizabeth Garrett; Todd Dorman; Peter J Pronovost Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Marlís González-Fernández; Michael Gardyn; Shamolie Wyckoff; Paul K S Ky; Jeffrey B Palmer Journal: Dysphagia Date: 2009-04-28 Impact factor: 3.438
Authors: Martin B Brodsky; Minxuan Huang; Carl Shanholtz; Pedro A Mendez-Tellez; Jeffrey B Palmer; Elizabeth Colantuoni; Dale M Needham Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2017-03
Authors: Nicola Latronico; Margaret Herridge; Ramona O Hopkins; Derek Angus; Nicholas Hart; Greet Hermans; Theodore Iwashyna; Yaseen Arabi; Giuseppe Citerio; E. Wesley Ely; Jesse Hall; Sangeeta Mehta; Kathleen Puntillo; Johannes Van den Hoeven; Hannah Wunsch; Deborah Cook; Claudia Dos Santos; Gordon Rubenfeld; Jean-Louis Vincent; Greet Van den Berghe; Elie Azoulay; Dale M Needham Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2017-03-13 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Laura W J Baijens; Margaret Walshe; Leena-Maija Aaltonen; Christoph Arens; Reinie Cordier; Patrick Cras; Lise Crevier-Buchman; Chris Curtis; Wojciech Golusinski; Roganie Govender; Jesper Grau Eriksen; Kevin Hansen; Kate Heathcote; Markus M Hess; Sefik Hosal; Jens Peter Klussmann; C René Leemans; Denise MacCarthy; Beatrice Manduchi; Jean-Paul Marie; Reza Nouraei; Claire Parkes; Christina Pflug; Walmari Pilz; Julie Regan; Nathalie Rommel; Antonio Schindler; Annemie M W J Schols; Renee Speyer; Giovanni Succo; Irene Wessel; Anna C H Willemsen; Taner Yilmaz; Pere Clavé Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2020-12-19 Impact factor: 2.503
Authors: Marc Moss; S David White; Heather Warner; Daniel Dvorkin; Daniel Fink; Stephanie Gomez-Taborda; Carrie Higgins; Gintas P Krisciunas; Joseph E Levitt; Jeffrey McKeehan; Edel McNally; Alix Rubio; Rebecca Scheel; Jonathan M Siner; Rosemary Vojnik; Susan E Langmore Journal: Chest Date: 2020-07-25 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Peter E Spronk; Laura E J Spronk; Ingrid Egerod; Jennifer McGaughey; Jackie McRae; Louise Rose; Martin B Brodsky Journal: Dysphagia Date: 2022-01-29 Impact factor: 3.438