Literature DB >> 18058175

Clinical utility of the 3-ounce water swallow test.

Debra M Suiter1, Steven B Leder.   

Abstract

The 3-ounce water swallow test is frequently used to screen individuals for aspiration risk. Prior research concerning its clinical usefulness, however, is confounded by inadequate statistical power due to small sample sizes and varying methodologies. Importantly, research has been limited to a few select patient populations, thereby limiting the widespread generalizability and applicability of the 3-ounce test. The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical utility of the 3-ounce water swallow test for determining aspiration status and oral feeding recommendations in a large and heterogeneous patient population. Fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) was performed in conjunction with the 3-ounce water swallow test on 3000 participants with a wide range of ages and diagnoses. A total of 1151 (38.4%) passed and 1849 (61.6%) failed the 3-ounce water swallow test. Sensitivity of the 3-ounce water swallow test for predicting aspiration status during FEES = 96.5%, specificity = 48.7%, and false positive rate = 51.3%. Sensitivity for identifying individuals who were deemed safe for oral intake based on FEES results = 96.4%, specificity = 46.4%, and false positive rate = 53.6%. Passing the 3-ounce water swallow test appears to be a good predictor of ability to tolerate thin liquids. However, failure often does not indicate inability to tolerate thin liquids, i.e., low specificity and high false-positive rate. Use of the 3-ounce water swallow test alone to make decisions regarding safety of liquid intake results in over-referral and unnecessary restriction of liquid intake for nearly 50% of patients tested. In addition, because 71% of participants who failed the 3-ounce water swallow test were deemed safe for an oral diet, nonsuccess on the 3-ounce water swallow test is not indicative of swallowing failure. The clinical utility of the 3-ounce water swallow test has been extended to include a wide range of medical and surgical diagnostic categories. Importantly, for the first time it has been shown that if the 3-ounce water swallow test is passed, diet recommendations can be made without further objective dysphagia testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18058175     DOI: 10.1007/s00455-007-9127-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dysphagia        ISSN: 0179-051X            Impact factor:   3.438


  26 in total

1.  Inter- and intrajudge reliability of a clinical examination of swallowing in adults.

Authors:  G H McCullough; R T Wertz; J C Rosenbek; R H Mills; K B Ross; J R Ashford
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.438

2.  Validation of the 3-oz water swallow test for aspiration following stroke.

Authors:  K L DePippo; M A Holas; M J Reding
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1992-12

3.  Validation of the 50 ml3 drinking test for evaluation of post-stroke dysphagia.

Authors:  D Gottlieb; M Kipnis; E Sister; Y Vardi; S Brill
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.033

4.  Introduction of simple swallowing ability test for prevention of aspiration pneumonia in the elderly and investigation of factors of swallowing disorders.

Authors:  Yoshiko Miyazaki; Motoki Arakawa; Junko Kizu
Journal:  Yakugaku Zasshi       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 0.302

5.  A prospective, double-blind, randomized study on the use of a topical anesthetic, vasoconstrictor, and placebo during transnasal flexible fiberoptic endoscopy.

Authors:  S B Leder; D A Ross; K B Briskin; C T Sasaki
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Identification of a simple screening tool for dysphagia in patients with stroke using factor analysis of multiple dysphagia variables.

Authors:  Kaori Nishiwaki; Tetsuya Tsuji; Meigen Liu; Kimitaka Hase; Naofumi Tanaka; Toshiyuki Fujiwara
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Aspiration and relative risk of medical complications following stroke.

Authors:  M A Holas; K L DePippo; M J Reding
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1994-10

8.  Utility of clinical swallowing examination measures for detecting aspiration post-stroke.

Authors:  G H McCullough; J C Rosenbek; R T Wertz; S McCoy; G Mann; K McCullough
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Videofluoroscopic evidence of aspiration predicts pneumonia and death but not dehydration following stroke.

Authors:  J Schmidt; M Holas; K Halvorson; M Reding
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.438

10.  The association of swallowing dysfunction and aspiration pneumonia.

Authors:  B J Martin; M M Corlew; H Wood; D Olson; L A Golopol; M Wingo; N Kirmani
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.438

View more
  72 in total

1.  Letter by Daniels regarding article "Silent aspiration risk is volume-dependent".

Authors:  Stephanie K Daniels
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 3.438

2.  Voice-quality abnormalities as a sign of dysphagia: validation against acoustic and videofluoroscopic data.

Authors:  Ashley Waito; Gemma L Bailey; Sonja M Molfenter; Dana C Zoratto; Catriona M Steele
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2010-05-08       Impact factor: 3.438

3.  Nutritional Care Needs in Elderly Residents of Long-Term Care Institutions: Potential Implications for Policies.

Authors:  A Pezzana; E Cereda; P Avagnina; G Malfi; E Paiola; Z Frighi; I Capizzi; E Sgnaolin; M L Amerio
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.075

Review 4.  Bedside screening to detect oropharyngeal dysphagia in patients with neurological disorders: an updated systematic review.

Authors:  Berit Kertscher; Renée Speyer; Maria Palmieri; Chris Plant
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 3.438

5.  Validation of the Yale Swallow Protocol: a prospective double-blinded videofluoroscopic study.

Authors:  Debra M Suiter; Joanna Sloggy; Steven B Leder
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 6.  Screening Accuracy for Aspiration Using Bedside Water Swallow Tests: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Martin B Brodsky; Debra M Suiter; Marlís González-Fernández; Henry J Michtalik; Tobi B Frymark; Rebecca Venediktov; Tracy Schooling
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 7.  Swallowing dysfunction after critical illness.

Authors:  Madison Macht; S David White; Marc Moss
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 9.410

8.  To Cough or Not to Cough? Examining the Potential Utility of Cough Testing in the Clinical Evaluation of Swallowing.

Authors:  Stephanie A Watts; Lauren Tabor; Emily K Plowman
Journal:  Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep       Date:  2016-09-12

9.  Deep Learning for Classification of Normal Swallows in Adults.

Authors:  Joshua M Dudik; James L Coyle; Amro El-Jaroudi; Zhi-Hong Mao; Mingui Sun; Ervin Sejdić
Journal:  Neurocomputing       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 5.719

10.  Pneumonia and in-hospital mortality in the context of neurogenic oropharyngeal dysphagia (NOD) in stroke and a new NOD step-wise concept.

Authors:  G W Ickenstein; A Riecker; C Höhlig; R Müller; U Becker; H Reichmann; M Prosiegel
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2010-04-10       Impact factor: 4.849

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.