OBJECTIVE: Cognitive remediation programs often have larger effects on cognition compared with everyday outcomes. We compared changes across cognitive, functional competence, and vocational domains in 2 cognitive remediation programs. METHOD: A sequential enrollment, nonrandom design with 50 individuals with serious mental illnesses (psychotic and mood disorders) from a community vocational rehabilitation program. Action-Based Cognitive Remediation (ABCR), a new program that combines traditional cognitive training techniques with simulated workplace situations and goal setting for engaging with cognitively demanding activities (N = 24; 19 completers) was compared with traditional cognitive remediation (tCR; N = 26; 15 completers). Both groups met twice-weekly for 2-hr sessions over 10 weeks. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used to examine effects pre- and posttreatment and 10 weeks after treatment. Univariate analysis of variance and chi-square tests were used to compare work outcomes 6 months after intervention. RESULTS: Significantly more ABCR participants (83%) were retained in the intervention compared with tCR (57%) and reported greater increases in perceived competence with cognitively challenging tasks (η2 = .23). ABCR effects were significantly larger than tCR on functional competence (η2 = .53), with smaller, nonsignificant differences in social cognition (η2 = .14) and neurocognition (η 2 = .16). ABCR participants were marginally more likely to be competitively employed (68.4% vs. 40%) and, among those employed, ABCR participants experienced less job-related stress (η2 = .37). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Cognitive rehabilitative programs for serious mental illness that rely on computer-based training for neuroplasticity should ensure opportunities for active skill development and therapist-supported techniques to overcome challenges with generalizing cognitive effects to everyday outcomes. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved).
OBJECTIVE: Cognitive remediation programs often have larger effects on cognition compared with everyday outcomes. We compared changes across cognitive, functional competence, and vocational domains in 2 cognitive remediation programs. METHOD: A sequential enrollment, nonrandom design with 50 individuals with serious mental illnesses (psychotic and mood disorders) from a community vocational rehabilitation program. Action-Based Cognitive Remediation (ABCR), a new program that combines traditional cognitive training techniques with simulated workplace situations and goal setting for engaging with cognitively demanding activities (N = 24; 19 completers) was compared with traditional cognitive remediation (tCR; N = 26; 15 completers). Both groups met twice-weekly for 2-hr sessions over 10 weeks. Repeated measures analysis of variance was used to examine effects pre- and posttreatment and 10 weeks after treatment. Univariate analysis of variance and chi-square tests were used to compare work outcomes 6 months after intervention. RESULTS: Significantly more ABCR participants (83%) were retained in the intervention compared with tCR (57%) and reported greater increases in perceived competence with cognitively challenging tasks (η2 = .23). ABCR effects were significantly larger than tCR on functional competence (η2 = .53), with smaller, nonsignificant differences in social cognition (η2 = .14) and neurocognition (η 2 = .16). ABCR participants were marginally more likely to be competitively employed (68.4% vs. 40%) and, among those employed, ABCR participants experienced less job-related stress (η2 = .37). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Cognitive rehabilitative programs for serious mental illness that rely on computer-based training for neuroplasticity should ensure opportunities for active skill development and therapist-supported techniques to overcome challenges with generalizing cognitive effects to everyday outcomes. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved).
Authors: Eric J Lenze; Angela Stevens; Jill D Waring; Vy T Pham; Rita Haddad; Josh Shimony; J Philip Miller; Christopher R Bowie Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2020-03-26 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Caroline V Ott; Maj Vinberg; Christopher R Bowie; Ellen Margrethe Christensen; Gitte M Knudsen; Lars V Kessing; Kamilla W Miskowiak Journal: Trials Date: 2018-09-12 Impact factor: 2.279