Marcella Bellani1, Bruno Biagianti2, Niccolò Zovetti1, Maria Gloria Rossetti1, Cinzia Bressi3, Cinzia Perlini4, Paolo Brambilla3. 1. Section of Psychiatry, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy. 2. Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Department of Neurosciences and Mental Health, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy; Posit Science Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA. Electronic address: bruno.biagianti@positscience.com. 3. Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Department of Neurosciences and Mental Health, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy. 4. Section of Clinical Psychology, Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Bipolar disorder (BD) is characterized by cognitive impairments that are known to predict psychosocial functioning and quality of life. While cognitive remediation (CR) was originally developed to directly target cognitive symptoms in traumatic brain injury and psychotic illnesses, the efficacy of CR in BD has begun to emerge only in the last decade. Functional Remediation (FR) is an integrated intervention that has been developed to restore psychosocial functioning by means of ecological neurocognitive techniques that involve psychoeducation about cognitive dysfunctions and their impact on the general functioning. Because of the heterogeneity of treatment targets and mechanisms of actions, here we aim to illustrate the effects induced by existing CR/FR approaches in BD. METHODS: In this systematic review, we evaluated cognitive and functional outcomes after CR/FR in studies conducted in BD. RESULTS: Eleven studies met inclusion criteria: 3 RCTs that compared CR/FR to one or more control condition (n = 354), 5 secondary analyses that further examined data from these trials, 2 single-arm studies, and 1 naturalistic study. While features such as the use of computerized training tools and a group-based format recurred across studies, CR/FR paradigms targeting different cognitive and functional domains showed specificity of training focus to outcomes. Effect sizes were in the medium-large range, suggesting that patients with BD respond to treatment at or above the level reported in psychotic patients. Integrated approaches that combined cognitive exercises with group-based experiences were associated with both cognitive and functional improvements. CONCLUSIONS: In this review, we found support for the use of CR/FR paradigms in patients with BD with evidence of cognitive and functional improvements. The scarcity of currently published RCTs as well as of data examining mechanisms of action and neural correlates limits the generalizability of our findings.
BACKGROUND:Bipolar disorder (BD) is characterized by cognitive impairments that are known to predict psychosocial functioning and quality of life. While cognitive remediation (CR) was originally developed to directly target cognitive symptoms in traumatic brain injury and psychotic illnesses, the efficacy of CR in BD has begun to emerge only in the last decade. Functional Remediation (FR) is an integrated intervention that has been developed to restore psychosocial functioning by means of ecological neurocognitive techniques that involve psychoeducation about cognitive dysfunctions and their impact on the general functioning. Because of the heterogeneity of treatment targets and mechanisms of actions, here we aim to illustrate the effects induced by existing CR/FR approaches in BD. METHODS: In this systematic review, we evaluated cognitive and functional outcomes after CR/FR in studies conducted in BD. RESULTS: Eleven studies met inclusion criteria: 3 RCTs that compared CR/FR to one or more control condition (n = 354), 5 secondary analyses that further examined data from these trials, 2 single-arm studies, and 1 naturalistic study. While features such as the use of computerized training tools and a group-based format recurred across studies, CR/FR paradigms targeting different cognitive and functional domains showed specificity of training focus to outcomes. Effect sizes were in the medium-large range, suggesting that patients with BD respond to treatment at or above the level reported in psychoticpatients. Integrated approaches that combined cognitive exercises with group-based experiences were associated with both cognitive and functional improvements. CONCLUSIONS: In this review, we found support for the use of CR/FR paradigms in patients with BD with evidence of cognitive and functional improvements. The scarcity of currently published RCTs as well as of data examining mechanisms of action and neural correlates limits the generalizability of our findings.
Authors: Lucy J Robinson; Jill M Thompson; Peter Gallagher; Utpal Goswami; Allan H Young; I Nicol Ferrier; P Brian Moore Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2006-03-06 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Sophia Vinogradov; Melissa Fisher; Heather Warm; Christine Holland; Margaret A Kirshner; Bruce G Pollock Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2009-07-01 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Thilo Deckersbach; Andrew A Nierenberg; Ronald Kessler; Hannah G Lund; Rebecca M Ametrano; Gary Sachs; Scott L Rauch; Darin Dougherty Journal: CNS Neurosci Ther Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 5.243
Authors: Adriane R Rosa; Jose Sánchez-Moreno; Anabel Martínez-Aran; Manel Salamero; Carla Torrent; Maria Reinares; Mercè Comes; Francesc Colom; Willemijn Van Riel; Jose Luis Ayuso-Mateos; Flávio Kapczinski; Eduard Vieta Journal: Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health Date: 2007-06-07