Literature DB >> 2709993

A method for correctly setting the rf flip angle.

W H Perman1, M A Bernstein, J C Sandstrom.   

Abstract

Currently the accepted method for setting the correct rf power levels to achieve 90 degrees and 180 degrees rf pulses for MR imaging is to peak the echo amplitude of a rf spin-echo sequence. The echo amplitude of this alpha-2 alpha pulse sequence is proportional to sin3 (alpha) and has a relatively broad maximum. Recently another method for setting the rf flip angle by maximizing the ratio of the stimulated echo to the primary echo amplitudes (in a 3 alpha sequence) demonstrated accuracy similar to that of the spin-echo method using a shorter repetition time. We present a new, more sensitive, and more accurate method for setting the correct rf power levels for 90 degrees and 180 degrees rf pulses. In this method, based upon the stimulated echo pulse sequence, we are able to accurately set the rf power to within +/- 0.1 dB by minimizing the signal amplitude of the third spin echo. This null method works for both selective and nonselective rf pulses of flip angle 90 degrees or 180 degrees, allowing the user to accurately adjust the relative amplitudes of the four rf pulse types within a single pulse sequence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2709993     DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1910090104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  6 in total

1.  Fast volumetric spatial-spectral MR imaging of hyperpolarized 13C-labeled compounds using multiple echo 3D bSSFP.

Authors:  William H Perman; Pratip Bhattacharya; Jochen Leupold; Alexander P Lin; Kent C Harris; Valerie A Norton; Jan-Bernd Hövener; Brian D Ross
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 2.546

2.  A method of RF inhomogeneity correction in MR imaging.

Authors:  H Mihara; N Iriguchi; S Ueno
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  Practical considerations in T1 mapping of prostate for dynamic contrast enhancement pharmacokinetic analyses.

Authors:  Fiona M Fennessy; Andriy Fedorov; Sandeep N Gupta; Ehud J Schmidt; Clare M Tempany; Robert V Mulkern
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-08-13       Impact factor: 2.546

4.  T1 mapping for liver function evaluation in gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging: comparison of look-locker inversion recovery and B1 inhomogeneity-corrected variable flip angle method.

Authors:  Ji Eun Kim; Hyun Ok Kim; Kyungsoo Bae; Dae Seob Choi; Dominik Nickel
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-03-22       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Comparison of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging sequences with laboratory parameters for prognosticating renal function in chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Tsutomu Inoue; Eito Kozawa; Masahiro Ishikawa; Daichi Fukaya; Hiroaki Amano; Yusuke Watanabe; Koji Tomori; Naoki Kobayashi; Mamoru Niitsu; Hirokazu Okada
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Evaluation of B1 inhomogeneity effect on DCE-MRI data analysis of brain tumor patients at 3T.

Authors:  Anirban Sengupta; Rakesh Kumar Gupta; Anup Singh
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2017-12-02       Impact factor: 5.531

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.