AIMS: Intrathecal baclofen (ITB) has proven to be an effective and safe treatment for severe spasticity. However, although ITB is used extensively, clinical decisions are based on very scarce pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PKPD) data. The aim of this study was to measure baclofen CSF concentrations and clinical effects after administration of various ITB boluses in patients with spasticity and to create a PKPD model for ITB. METHODS: Twelve patients with severe spasticity received four different bolus doses of ITB (0, 25, 50, 75 μg and an optional dose of 100 μg), administered via a catheter with the tip at thoracic level (Th) 10. After each bolus, 10 CSF samples were taken at fixed time intervals, using a catheter with the tip located at Th12. Clinical effect was assessed by measuring spasticity with the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS). These data were used to develop a PKPD model. RESULTS: All patients achieved an adequate spasmolytic effect with ITB doses varying from 50 to 100 μg. No serious side effects were observed. CSF baclofen concentrations, as well as the clinical effects, correlated significantly with ITB doses. The PK model predicted a steep spinal concentration gradient of ITB along the spinal axis. The clinical effect could be predicted using a delayed-effect model. CONCLUSIONS: ITB is an effective and safe therapy with, however, a steep concentration gradient along the spinal axis. This means that the administered baclofen is staying mainly around the catheter tip, which stresses the importance to position the ITB catheter tip closely to the targeted spinal level.
AIMS: Intrathecal baclofen (ITB) has proven to be an effective and safe treatment for severe spasticity. However, although ITB is used extensively, clinical decisions are based on very scarce pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PKPD) data. The aim of this study was to measure baclofen CSF concentrations and clinical effects after administration of various ITB boluses in patients with spasticity and to create a PKPD model for ITB. METHODS: Twelve patients with severe spasticity received four different bolus doses of ITB (0, 25, 50, 75 μg and an optional dose of 100 μg), administered via a catheter with the tip at thoracic level (Th) 10. After each bolus, 10 CSF samples were taken at fixed time intervals, using a catheter with the tip located at Th12. Clinical effect was assessed by measuring spasticity with the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS). These data were used to develop a PKPD model. RESULTS: All patients achieved an adequate spasmolytic effect with ITB doses varying from 50 to 100 μg. No serious side effects were observed. CSF baclofen concentrations, as well as the clinical effects, correlated significantly with ITB doses. The PK model predicted a steep spinal concentration gradient of ITB along the spinal axis. The clinical effect could be predicted using a delayed-effect model. CONCLUSIONS:ITB is an effective and safe therapy with, however, a steep concentration gradient along the spinal axis. This means that the administered baclofen is staying mainly around the catheter tip, which stresses the importance to position the ITB catheter tip closely to the targeted spinal level.
Authors: J F M Fleuren; G E Voerman; C V Erren-Wolters; G J Snoek; J S Rietman; H J Hermens; A V Nene Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2009-09-21 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: Jay M Meythaler; Warren Clayton; Linda K Davis; Sharon Guin-Renfroe; Robert C Brunner Journal: J Head Trauma Rehabil Date: 2004 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.710
Authors: Amparo Saenz; Miguel Grijalba; Juan Pablo Mengide; Romina Argañaraz; Fernando Ford; Beatriz Mantese Journal: Childs Nerv Syst Date: 2020-06-06 Impact factor: 1.532
Authors: Brett J Hilton; Andreas Husch; Barbara Schaffran; Tien-Chen Lin; Emily R Burnside; Sebastian Dupraz; Max Schelski; Jisoo Kim; Johannes Alexander Müller; Susanne Schoch; Cordelia Imig; Nils Brose; Frank Bradke Journal: Neuron Date: 2021-10-26 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: Gregory M Shackleford; Min Y Mahdi; Rex A Moats; Debra Hawes; Hung C Tran; Jonathan L Finlay; Tuan Q Hoang; Ellis F Meng; Anat Erdreich-Epstein Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-01-04 Impact factor: 3.240