| Literature DB >> 27099629 |
Jing Fu1, Guangxin Huo1, Lili Feng1, Yufeng Mao1, Zhiwen Wang1, Hongwu Ma2, Tao Chen1,3, Xueming Zhao1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: 2,3-Butanediol (2,3-BD) with low toxicity to microbes, could be a promising alternative for biofuel production. However, most of the 2,3-BD producers are opportunistic pathogens that are not suitable for industrial-scale fermentation. In our previous study, wild-type Bacillus subtilis 168, as a class I microorganism, was first found to generate only d-(-)-2,3-BD (purity >99 %) under low oxygen conditions.Entities:
Keywords: Bacillus subtilis; Cofactor engineering; Meso-2,3-butanediol; Metabolic engineering; d-(−)-2,3-butanediol
Year: 2016 PMID: 27099629 PMCID: PMC4837526 DOI: 10.1186/s13068-016-0502-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Biofuels ISSN: 1754-6834 Impact factor: 6.040
Fig. 1The meso-2,3-BD biosynthetic pathway in B. subtilis. Enzymes overexpressed or introduced are underlined and depicted in green, and those interrupted are shown in red with a cross. Expanded names of enzymes and their coding genes: ALS acetolactate synthase, alsS; ALD acetolactate decarboxylase, alsD; ACK acetate kinase, ack; ALDH acetaldehyde dehydrogenase, adh; ADH alcohol dehydrogenase, ack; LDH lactate dehydrogenase, ldh; PDH pyruvate dehydrogenase, pdhABCD; PTA phosphotransacetylase, pta; PYC pyruvate carboxylase; E1, d-(−)-butanediol dehydrogenase (EC 1.1.1.4), bdhA; E2, L-(+)-butanediol dehydrogenase (EC 1.1.1.76), budC
Metabolic characterizations of B. subtilis strains cultivated in M9 medium supplemented with 10 g/L glucose under the microaerobic condition
| Strain | CDWa,c (g/L) | 2,3-BDb,c (g/L) | ACb,c (g/L) | Acetateb,c (g/L) | Lactateb,c (g/L) | Succinateb (g/L) | Glucose uptake ratec [g/(L h)] | Time for glucose depletionc (<0.2 g/L) (h) | 2,3-BD productivityc (g/(L h)) | 2,3-BD yieldc (mol/mol) | AC + 2,3-BD (at 60 h) (g/L) | AC + 2,3-BD (at 96 h) (g/L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSF1c | 0.960 ± 0.012 | 2.70(D) ± 0.05 | 0.82 ± 0.06 | 0.24 ± 0.03 | 0.40 ± 0.04 | 0.08 ± 0.00 | 0.270 | 37 | 0.073 | 0.54 | 4.10 + 0.27 | 2.90 + 0 |
| BSF2 | 0.920 ± 0.005 | 2.84(D) ± 0.11 | 1.03 ± 0.07 | 0.20 ± 0.02 | 0.36 ± 0.01 | 0.09 ± 0.01 | 0.260 | 38.5 | 0.074 | 0.57 | 4.20 + 0.19 | 3.95 + 0 |
| BSF3c | 0.898 ± 0.015 | NDd | 3.83 ± 0.02 | 0.17 ± 0.01 | 0.44 ± 0.03 | 0.07 ± 0.00 | 0.233 | 43 | 0 | 0 | 4.21 + 0 | 4.00 + 0 |
| BSF4 | 0.828 ± 0.011 | ND | 3.70 ± 0.05 | 0.14 ± 0.01 | 0.34 ± 0.05 | 0.11 ± 0.01 | 0.222 | 45 | 0 | 0 | 3.87 + 0 | 3.64 + 0 |
| BSF5 | 0.814 ± 0.009 | ND | 3.71 ± 0.10 | 0.71 ± 0.01 | ND | 0.29 ± 0.01 | 0.208 | 48 | 0 | 0 | 3.69 + 0 | 3.50 + 0 |
| BSF6 | 0.806 ± 0.004 | ND | 3.88 ± 0.02 | 0.61 ± 0.01 | ND | 0.20 ± 0.03 | 0.200 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 3.71 + 0 | 3.52 + 0 |
| BSF7 | 0.813 ± 0.007 | 2.85(M) ± 0.12 | 0.91 ± 0.11 | 0.73 ± 0.03 | ND | 0.28 ± 0.02 | 0.244 | 41 | 0.070 | 0.57 | 2.14 + 1.83 | 2.04 + 0.97 |
| BSF8 | 0.838 ± 0.010 | 2.90(M) ± 0.05 | 1.10 ± 0.02 | 0.65 ± 0.01 | ND | 0.25 ± 0.02 | 0.244 | 41 | 0.071 | 0.58 | 1.93 + 1.58 | 1.90 + 0.88 |
| BSF9 | 0.846 ± 0.008 | 3.56(M) ± 0.08 | 0.68 ± 0.05 | 0.56 ± 0.04 | ND | 0.19 ± 0.01 | 0.256 | 39 | 0.091 | 0.71 | 1.70 + 2.43 | 1.72 + 1.93 |
| BSF17 | 0.970 ± 0.008 | 2.93(M) ± 0.09 | 1.04 ± 0.08 | 0.18 ± 0.02 | 0.66 ± 0.03 | 0.05 ± 0.00 | 0.270 | 37 | 0.079 | 0.59 | 2.42 + 1.56 | 2.51 + 0.81 |
| BSF18c | 0.945 ± 0.009 | 3.01(D) ± 0.06 | 0.92 ± 0.09 | 0.29 ± 0.01 | 0.69 ± 0.03 | 0.06 ± 0.00 | 0.260 | 38 | 0.079 | 0.60 | 3.92 + 0.11 | 3.85 + 0 |
| BSF25 | 0.969 ± 0.012 | 3.28(M) ± 0.04 | 0.85 ± 0.07 | 0.14 ± 0.01 | 0.25 ± 0.02 | 0.06 ± 0.00 | 0.278 | 36 | 0.091 | 0.66 | 2.96 + 1.31 | 2.53 + 0.94 |
Bacteria were cultivated with 100 mL M9 in a 250-mL flask at an agitation speed of 100 rpm and 37 °C; Data are average values and standard deviations of triplicate experiments. CDW cell dry weight, 2,3-BD 2,3-butanediol, D d-(−)-2,3-BD, M meso-2,3-BD; ND not detected or lower than 0.01 g/L
aThe CDW was calculated using the relationship “CDW = OD600*0.325”
bThese metabolites were measured when the residual glucose almost reached zero (<0.2 g/L)
cThese results for BSF1, BSF3, and BSF18 were published in a previous paper (Fu et al. [25]), and are listed here for relative discussion in this paper
Fig. 2Changes in the levels of intracellular NADH/NAD+ ratios in different strains. Bacteria were cultivated using a mixture of 100 mL M9 and 10 g/L glucose in a 250-mL flask kept agitated at a speed of 100 rpm and 37 °C. The intracellular NADH and NAD+ were extracted after 30 h. Data show average values and standard deviations of triplicate experiments
Long-term fermentation of B. subtilis strains in the LB(Y) medium supplemented with 105 g/L glucose under microaerobic condition
| Strain | CDWa (g/L) (at 216 h) | 2,3-BDb (g/L) | ACb (g/L) | Acetateb (g/L) | Lactateb (g/L) | Succinateb (g/L) | Glucose consumed (g/h) (at 216 h) | Glucose uptake rate [g/(L h)] | 2,3-BD productivity [g/(L h)] | 2,3-BD yield (mol/mol) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSF1 | 3.10 ± 0.38 | 40.84 ± 1.25(D) | 3.47 ± 0.49 | 0.63 ± 0.11 | 1.19 ± 0.15 | 0.10 ± 0.02 | 87.3 ± 2.1 | 0.404 | 0.189 | 0.936 |
| BSF9 | 3.82 ± 0.41 | 50.16 ± 0.52(M) | 3.35 ± 0.79 | 0.62 ± 0.11 | 0.04 ± 0.00 | 0.16 ± 0.02 | 104.3 ± 0.5 | 0.483 | 0.232 | 0.962 |
| BSF25 | 4.17 ± 0.22 | 49.59 ± 0.23(M) | 2.66 ± 0.48 | 0.34 ± 0.04 | 1.17 ± 0.17 | 0.11 ± 0.02 | 105.0 ± 0.0 | 0.486 | 0.230 | 0.945 |
Bacteria were cultivated using a mixture of 100-mL LBR medium and 10.5 % glucose in a 250-mL flask kept agitated at a speed of 100 rpm and 37 °C; Data are average values and standard deviations of triplicate experiments. D, d-(−)-2,3-BD; M, meso-2,3-BD
aThe CDW was calculated using the relationship: “CDW = OD600*0.325”
bThese metabolites were measured at 216 h
Fig. 3Metabolic distribution of reducing power [H] in B. subtilis mutants. The arrows represent the delivery of the [H] in NADH, and the dashed arrows represent the creation of the [H]. The acetoin synthesis and breakdown pathway are indicated in the oval frame. Overexpressed genes are underlined. Disrupted pathway steps ar indicated by broken arrows
Fig. 4Optimization of oxygen supply in 5-L fermentor. BSF9 was cultured in LBR medium with glucose at 37 °C and 300 rpm in a 5-L fermenter at different aeration rates. Filled square glucose concentration; Filled circle 2,3-BD concentration; Filled triangle AC concentration; Filled diamond cell density, optical density at 600 nm (OD600). Cultivation was carried out at an initial pH of 6.5. Agitation speed was 300 rpm. Batch fermentation with aeration rates of a 1 vvm; b 0.5 vvm; c 0.1 vvm; d glucose consumption, meso-2,3-BD production, AC, meso-2,3-BD yield, and AC + BD total yield of BSF9 during oxygen-supply optimization in batch fermentation process
Fig. 5Meso-2,3-BD production from glucose using BSF9 in fed-batch fermentation. Filled square glucose concentration; Filled circle 2,3-BD concentration; Filled triangle AC concentration; Filled diamond cell density, optical density at 600 nm (OD600). Cultivation was carried out at an initial pH of 6.5; during the fermentation processes, the pH was uncontrolled. Agitation speed was 300 rpm, and aeration rate was 0.02 vvm
Fig. 6Meso-2,3-BD production, biomass, and productivity using BSF9 at different fermentation temperatures. BSF9 was cultivated in a mixture of 100 mL M9 and 10 g/L glucose in a 250-mL flask kept agitated at a speed of 100 rpm
Fig. 7The phylogenetic tree based on typical amino acid sequences of AR from 14 2,3-BD producers. The sequences were extracted from the NCBI protein database by a BLAST search. The phylogenetic tree was constructed by the neighbor-joining method with the Poisson correction model by the software MEGA 5
Strains and plasmids
| Name | Relevant genotype | Source/reference |
|---|---|---|
| Strains | ||
|
| Wide-type strain, trpC2 | BGSCa |
|
| Invitrogen | |
|
| CICCb | |
| BSF1 |
| (Fu et al. [ |
| BSF2 |
| This study |
| BSF3 |
| (Fu et al. [ |
| BSF4 |
| This study |
| BSF5 |
| This study |
| BSF6 |
| This study |
| BSF7 |
| This study |
| BSF8 |
| This study |
| BSF9 |
| This study |
| BSF17 |
| This study |
| BSF18 |
| (Fu et al. [ |
| BSF25 |
| This study |
| Plasmids | ||
| pUC18 | Ampr | Lab Stock |
| pUC18- | Kanr | Lab Stock |
| pC194 | Cmr, | Lab Stock |
| pE194 | Emr, | Lab Stock |
| pHP13 | Cmr, Emr, | Lab Stock |
| pUC18-SP | Ampr, Spcr, containing | Lab stock |
| pUC18-SP- | Ampr, Spcr, containing | This study |
| pCU | puC18 containing | Lab stock |
| pCU- | pCU containing | This study |
| pCU- | pCU containing | This study |
| pCU- | pCU- | This study |
| pUC18-SP- | Ampr, Spcr, containing | This study |
| pUC18- | Ampr, Emr, containing | This study |
| pUC18- | Ampr, Emr, containing | This study |
| pUC18- | Ampr, Emr, containing | This study |
| pUC18- | Ampr, Emr, containing | This study |
| pPSDBUE | pUC18- | This study |
| pHP13- | Emr, Cmr, containing | This study |
a Bacillus Genetic Stock Center
bChina Center of Industrial Culture Collection
Primers used in this study
| Primer name | Sequence (5′–3′) |
|---|---|
|
| ACATGCATGCAATTGAAGGACATCATCGCTA |
|
| CATTGTCTTCAATTCTCGAGCGGCCATGGGGACTTAAGAACCTCCTCAAAAAGTTACAA |
|
| TTTTGAGGAGGTTCTTAAGTCCCCATGGCCGCTCGAGAATTGAAGACAATGGCAGCTCT |
|
| CGGGGTACCACAGCTTGCGCTTTAACGAGA |
|
| ACATGCATGCCCCACTCGTAATCGTCAAAGCC |
|
| CGGGGTACCAAGTCCCATGCCGTTAATCACC |
|
| TGGACAGCCTGAGGAACTCTCG |
|
| ACGTCATCTGCACTCGAGAGATCTCTTAAGTCCATCACATCGCCCATTGCTT |
|
| CGATGTGATGGACTTAAGAGATCTCTCGAGTGCAGATGACGTGTACATCGG |
|
| CAGGAAGGCTCCAGATGGTGA |
|
| GCGCGGGACGTCGGCAAATGCAGGTTCATCCTC |
|
| GCGCGGGACGTCCCTCGCGGTAAATCTCTTTCGG |
| S- | CGCGGATCCCCAAGGAGGGTATAGCTATGAAAAAAGTCGCACTTGTTACC |
| S- | TGCTCTAGAGGATGCTTACACTTACACTCAAAC |
| O- | CCGGAATTCCAGGCCGGGGCATATGGGAAACA |
| O- | CGCGGATCCTCCCCCGGGAATTCTTGTCTGTTCATGTGTA |
| O- | TCCCCCGGGCCAAGGAGGGTATAGCTTTGACAAAAGCAACAAAAGAACAA |
| O- | CGCGGATCCTTATTCAGGGCTTCCTTCAGTTGT |
| O- | CGCGGATCCCCAAGGAGGGTATAGCTATGAAAAAAGTCGCACTTGTTACCG |
| O- | CGCGGATCCGCCTAGCTAGCCGGACTAGTTTAGTTAAATACCATCCCGCCGTC |
| O- | CGCGGATCCAAAGGAGGAATTCAAAATGAAGGCAGCAAGATGGCATAAC |
| O- | CGCGGATCCGCACTCGAGCGGACTTAAGCAAATTAGTTAGGTCTAACAAG |
| O- | TTAGACTAGTACAAGGAGGACCCTACCATGCCACATTC |
| O- | ACATGCATGCGCCTAGCTAGCCGGCGACGCGTTTAAAACAGGCGGTTTAAACCG |
| O- | GCGCGGGACGTCCCCACTTTATCCAATTTTCGTT |
| O- | GCGCGGGACGTCCTCACGTTAAGGGATTTTGGTCA |
| E- | TCGGGGTACCAAAGGAGGAATTCAAAATGAAAAAAGTCGCACTTGTTACCG |
| E- | CGCGGATCCGCACTCGAGCGGACTTAAGTTAGTTAAATACCATCCCGCCGTC |