| Literature DB >> 27099625 |
Thanyalak Fansiri1, Arissara Pongsiri1, Chonticha Klungthong2, Alongkot Ponlawat1, Butsaya Thaisomboonsuk2, Richard G Jarman3, Thomas W Scott4, Louis Lambrechts5.
Abstract
Despite their epidemiological importance, the evolutionary forces that shape the spatial structure of dengue virus genetic diversity are not fully understood. Fine-scale genetic structure of mosquito vector populations and evidence for genotype × genotype interactions between dengue viruses and their mosquito vectors are consistent with the hypothesis that the geographical distribution of dengue virus genetic diversity may reflect viral adaptation to local mosquito populations. To test this hypothesis, we measured vector competence in all sympatric and allopatric combinations of 14 low-passage dengue virus isolates and two wild-type populations of Aedes aegypti mosquitoes sampled in Bangkok and Kamphaeng Phet, two sites located about 300 km apart in Thailand. Despite significant genotype × genotype interactions, we found no evidence for superior vector competence in sympatric versus allopatric vector-virus combinations. Viral phylogenetic analysis revealed no geographical clustering of the 14 isolates, suggesting that high levels of viral migration (gene flow) in Thailand may counteract spatially heterogeneous natural selection. We conclude that it is unlikely that vector-mediated selection is a major driver of dengue virus adaptive evolution at the regional scale that we examined. Dengue virus local adaptation to mosquito vector populations could happen, however, in places or times that we did not test, or at a different geographical scale.Entities:
Keywords: Aedes aegypti; dengue virus; genotype × genotype interactions; local adaptation; population structure
Year: 2016 PMID: 27099625 PMCID: PMC4831462 DOI: 10.1111/eva.12360
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evol Appl ISSN: 1752-4571 Impact factor: 5.183
Figure 1Vector competence indices. Graphs show the percentage of infected mosquitoes (A, D), percentage of infected mosquitoes with a disseminated infection (B, E), and mean infectious titer of disseminated virus (C, F) for each combination of the 14 DENV‐1 isolates (indicated along the x‐axis) and two A. aegypti populations (BKK: blue squares; KPP: red circles). Each population‐virus pair was tested in two experimental blocks (block 1: A–C; block 2: D–F). In the two experimental blocks, viruses came from the same passage in cell culture, but were harvested separately, which resulted in slightly different blood meal titers (ranging from 1.5 × 105 PFU/mL to 8.5 × 106 PFU/mL). Within each block, however, mosquitoes from both populations were exposed to the same blood meal titer. Dotted, vertical lines separate experiment 1 (Exp1) and experiment 2 (Exp2).
Multiway analysis of vector competence indices. The proportion of infected mosquitoes and the proportion of infected mosquitoes with a disseminated infection were analyzed with a logistic regression. The leg titer of mosquitoes with a disseminated infection was analyzed by analysis of variance after log10‐transformation
| Variable | d.f. | Infection | Dissemination | Leg titer | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L‐R |
| L‐R |
|
|
| ||
| Blood meal titer | 1 | 71.2 | <0.0001 | 13.9 | 0.0002 | 7.14 | 0.0079 |
| Experiment | 1 | 128 | <0.0001 | <0.001 | 0.9984 | 18.0 | <0.0001 |
| Mosquito population | 1 | 1.90 | 0.1683 | <0.001 | 0.9983 | 5.68 | 0.0177 |
| Experiment × Population | 1 | 8.30 | 0.0040 | <0.001 | 0.9980 | 2.10 | 0.1481 |
| Virus isolate (within Experiment) | 12 | 8.57 | 0.7389 | 29.4 | 0.0034 | 4.74 | <0.0001 |
| Isolate × Population (within Experiment) | 12 | 21.8 | 0.0403 | 17.3 | 0.1392 | 1.72 | 0.0616 |
L‐R, likelihood ratio; d.f., degrees of freedom.
Test statistics of DENV local adaptation. Analysis of variance (anova) of the mean proportion of infected mosquitoes, mean proportion of infected mosquitoes with a disseminated infection, and log10‐transformed leg titer by DENV isolate weighted by mean sample size. For each isolate, mean vector competence indices were adjusted for effects of blood meal titer and experiment, and averaged between the two experimental blocks prior to the anova
| Variable | d.f. | Infection | Dissemination | Leg titer | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| Mosquito population | 1 | 0.217 | 0.6496 | 0.304 | 0.5913 | 4.96 | 0.0459 |
| Virus isolate | 13 | 0.465 | 0.9071 | 1.81 | 0.1577 | 2.45 | 0.0653 |
| Allopatric versus Sympatric | 1 | 0.009 | 0.9268 | 0.055 | 0.8192 | 0.279 | 0.2790 |
d.f., degrees of freedom.
Figure 2Tests of DENV local adaptation. Boxplots show the adjusted percentage of infected mosquitoes (A), adjusted percentage of infected mosquitoes with a disseminated infection (B), and adjusted mean infectious titer of disseminated virus (C) in allopatric versus sympatric combinations of the 14 DENV‐1 isolates and two A. aegypti populations of the study. Prior to testing for local adaptation, vector competence indices were adjusted for differences in blood meal titers and uncontrolled differences between the two experiments; values plotted are in arbitrary units. Each virus isolate is represented by the mean of two experimental blocks. P‐values above the bars indicate the statistical significance of the allopatric versus sympatric effect.
Figure 3Phylogenetic relationships among DENV isolates. Maximum likelihood tree based on E gene sequences of 47 DENV‐1 isolates including 14 from this study (in color) and 33 from GenBank (in black font). Red and blue fonts indicate viruses isolated from patients in Kamphaeng Phet (KPP) and Bangkok (BKK), respectively. Bootstrap resampling values are shown at major nodes, and the scale bar indicates the number of base substitutions per site.