| Literature DB >> 27096607 |
Jérôme Tourret1,2,3,4, Benjamin P Willing5,6, Matthew A Croxen5,7, Nicolas Dufour1,2,8,9, Sara Dion1,2, Sarah Wachtel1,2,10, Erick Denamur1,2, B Brett Finlay5.
Abstract
Uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) strains live as commensals in the digestive tract of the host, but they can also initiate urinary tract infections. The aim of this work was to determine how a host detects the presence of a new UPEC strain in the digestive tract. Mice were orally challenged with UPEC strains 536 and CFT073, non-pathogenic strain K12 MG1655, and ΔPAI-536, an isogenic mutant of strain 536 lacking all 7 pathogenicity islands whose virulence is drastically attenuated. Intestinal colonization was measured, and cytokine expression was determined in various organs recovered from mice after oral challenge. UPEC strain 536 efficiently colonized the mouse digestive tract, and prior Enterobacteriaceae colonization was found to impact strain 536 colonization efficiency. An innate immune response, detected as the production of TNFα, IL-6 and IL-10 cytokines, was activated in the ileum 48 hours after oral challenge with strain 536, and returned to baseline within 8 days, without a drop in fecal pathogen load. Although inflammation was detected in the ileum, histology was normal at the time of cytokine peak. Comparison of cytokine secretion 48h after oral gavage with E. coli strain 536, CFT073, MG1655 or ΔPAI-536 showed that inflammation was more pronounced with UPECs than with non-pathogenic or attenuated strains. Pathogenicity islands also seemed to be involved in host detection, as IL-6 intestinal secretion was increased after administration of E. coli strain 536, but not after administration of ΔPAI-536. In conclusion, UPEC colonization of the mouse digestive tract activates acute phase inflammatory cytokine secretion but does not trigger any pathological changes, illustrating the opportunistic nature of UPECs. This digestive tract colonization model will be useful for studying the factors controlling the switch from commensalism to pathogenicity.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27096607 PMCID: PMC4838251 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153034
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Intestinal colonization after a single oral challenge with 107 CFU of UPEC strain 536.
Fecal pellets were individually collected from C3H/HeOuJ (A) or C57BL6/J (B) mice every day or every other day after oral challenge. E. coli strain 536 CFUs were enumerated in the feces by serial dilution on MacConkey+streptomycin (30 μg/mL) agar plates and expressed as log10 (CFU/g feces). Mean bacterial loads were not significantly different over time (Fig 1A and 1B, one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s correction for multiple comparisons). C: Some C3H/HeOuJ mice provided by Jackson Laboratory were colonized by Enterobacteriaceae and others were not. Here, fecal counts on days 1 to 8, from Fig 1A are pooled, and represented according to the presence or absence of Enterobacteriaceae prior to oral gavage with E. coli strain 536. The line indicates a significant difference with p<0.01 (t-test). Bars and whiskers represent means ± standard deviation (Fig 1A and B) or median and interquartile range (Fig 1C).
Fig 2TNFα, IL-6, and IL-10 cytokine ELISA measurements in the ileum (A), caecum (B) and colon (C) 2 days after oral gavage with 100 μL of PBS (controls), and 2 or 8 days after oral gavage with 107 CFU of E. coli strain 536.
Box and whiskers represent medians and interquartile ranges. Lines indicate significant differences with p<0.01 (Mann-Whitney U test).
Fig 3A, and B: Hematoxylin and eosin stain of an ileum section of a mouse 2 days after oral challenge with 107 CFU of E. coli strain 536.
A: 10X magnification. B: 40X magnification.
Fig 4A: TNFα, IL-6, and IL-10 cytokine ELISA measurements in the ileum 2 days after oral gavage with 100 μL of PBS (controls), or 107 CFU of ΔPAI-536, MG1655, CFT073 or E. coli strain 536. Box and whiskers represent medians and interquartile ranges. Lines indicate significant differences (p<0.05 by Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s correction for multiple comparisons). B: the same measurements are represented in 3 groups: PBS (controls), non-pathogenic or attenuated strains (pooled data from ΔPAI-536 and MG1655) and UPEC strains (pooled data from CFT073 and E. coli strain 536). Box and whiskers represent medians and interquartile ranges. Lines indicate significant differences (Mann-Whitney U tests). C: E. coli fecal concentration one and two days (time of the sacrifice for cytokine measurement) after oral gavage. Bars and whiskers represent medians and interquartile ranges. Mice who cleared E. coli were assigned a bacterial load of 500 CFU g/feces, i.e. 2.7 log10 (CFU/g of feces), which was the limit of detection in our model. The line indicates a significant difference (Kruskal-Wallis tests with Dunn’s correction for multiple comparisons). Enterobacteriaceae-free C3H/HeOuJ mice only were used for this experiment. E. coli CFUs were enumerated in the feces by serial dilution on MacConkey agar plates and expressed as log10 (CFU/g feces). Each dot represents one E. coli fecal count.