Sarah A Redsell1, Stephen Weng2, Judy A Swift3, Dilip Nathan4, Cris Glazebrook5. 1. 1 Faculty of Health, Social Care, and Education, Anglia Ruskin University , Cambridge, United Kingdom . 2. 2 School of Medicine, Division of Primary Care, University of Nottingham , Nottingham, United Kingdom . 3. 3 Faculty of Science, University of Nottingham , Sutton Bonington, United Kingdom . 4. 4 Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Queen's Medical Centre , Nottingham, United Kingdom . 5. 5 Division of Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, School of Medicine, Institute of Mental Health, University of Nottingham , Nottingham, United Kingdom .
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Previous research has demonstrated the predictive validity of the Infant Risk of Overweight Checklist (IROC). This study further establishes the predictive accuracy of the IROC using data from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) and examines the optimal threshold for determining high risk of childhood overweight. METHODS: Using the IROC algorithm, we calculated the risk of being overweight, based on International Obesity Task Force criteria, in the first year of life for 980 children in the ALSPAC cohort at 5 years. Discrimination was assessed by the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC c-statistic). Net reclassification index (NRI) was calculated for risk thresholds ranging from 2.5% to 30%, which determine cutoffs for identifying infants at risk of becoming overweight. RESULTS: At 5 years of age, 12.3% of boys and 19.6% of girls were categorized overweight. Discrimination (AUC c-statistic) ranged from 0.67 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62-0.72) when risk scores were calculated directly to 0.93 (95% CI, 0.88-0.98) when the algorithm was recalibrated and missing values of the risk factor algorithm were imputed. The NRI showed that there were positive gains in reclassification using risk thresholds from 5% to 20%, with the maximum NRI being at 10%. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that the IROC has moderately good validity for assessing overweight risk in infants and offers an optimal threshold for determining high risk. The IROC algorithm has been imbedded into a computer program for Proactive Assessment of Obesity Risk during Infancy, which facilitates early overweight prevention through communication of risk to parents.
BACKGROUND: Previous research has demonstrated the predictive validity of the Infant Risk of Overweight Checklist (IROC). This study further establishes the predictive accuracy of the IROC using data from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) and examines the optimal threshold for determining high risk of childhood overweight. METHODS: Using the IROC algorithm, we calculated the risk of being overweight, based on International Obesity Task Force criteria, in the first year of life for 980 children in the ALSPAC cohort at 5 years. Discrimination was assessed by the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC c-statistic). Net reclassification index (NRI) was calculated for risk thresholds ranging from 2.5% to 30%, which determine cutoffs for identifying infants at risk of becoming overweight. RESULTS: At 5 years of age, 12.3% of boys and 19.6% of girls were categorized overweight. Discrimination (AUC c-statistic) ranged from 0.67 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62-0.72) when risk scores were calculated directly to 0.93 (95% CI, 0.88-0.98) when the algorithm was recalibrated and missing values of the risk factor algorithm were imputed. The NRI showed that there were positive gains in reclassification using risk thresholds from 5% to 20%, with the maximum NRI being at 10%. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that the IROC has moderately good validity for assessing overweight risk in infants and offers an optimal threshold for determining high risk. The IROC algorithm has been imbedded into a computer program for Proactive Assessment of Obesity Risk during Infancy, which facilitates early overweight prevention through communication of risk to parents.
Authors: Kyung E Rhee; Cynthia W De Lago; Tonya Arscott-Mills; Supriya D Mehta; Renee' Krysko Davis Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Maarten J G Leening; Moniek M Vedder; Jacqueline C M Witteman; Michael J Pencina; Ewout W Steyerberg Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2014-01-21 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Stephen F Weng; Sarah A Redsell; Dilip Nathan; Judy A Swift; Min Yang; Cris Glazebrook Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2013-07-15 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Abigail Fraser; Corrie Macdonald-Wallis; Kate Tilling; Andy Boyd; Jean Golding; George Davey Smith; John Henderson; John Macleod; Lynn Molloy; Andy Ness; Susan Ring; Scott M Nelson; Debbie A Lawlor Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2012-04-16 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Andy Boyd; Jean Golding; John Macleod; Debbie A Lawlor; Abigail Fraser; John Henderson; Lynn Molloy; Andy Ness; Susan Ring; George Davey Smith Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2012-04-16 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Jennie Rose; Cris Glazebrook; Heather Wharrad; A Niroshan Siriwardena; Judy Anne Swift; Dilip Nathan; Stephen Franklin Weng; Pippa Atkinson; Joanne Ablewhite; Fiona McMaster; Vicki Watson; Sarah Anne Redsell Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2019-03-12 Impact factor: 3.295