| Literature DB >> 27092068 |
Elissa B Klaassen1, Sarah Plukaard2, Elisabeth A T Evers3, Renate H M de Groot4, Walter H Backes5, Dick J Veltman6, Jelle Jolles2.
Abstract
This investigation was inspired by growing evidence that middle-aged persons in a cognitively demanding profession might be characterized by subtle cognitive fatigue. We studied young and middle-aged male schoolteachers. They were compared in a study with functional magnetic resonance imaging to evaluate differences during successful memory encoding. The schoolteachers were additionally subjected to an induced fatigue condition involving the sustained performance of cognitively demanding tasks and to a control condition. Results showed age-related brain activation differences underlying behavioral performance including: (1) greater activation in middle-aged vs. young teachers in bilateral prefrontal cortex (PFC) areas; and (2) differential fatigue effects in the left anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) depending on age group. Middle-aged schoolteachers showed decreased ACC activation in the fatigue compared to the control condition, whereas no change in activation was found in young teachers. Findings demonstrate age effects in these middle-aged subjects that are typically found in older adults, specifically in PFC over-activation. Findings also indicate that already in middle age cognitive aging may be associated with greater resource depletion following sustained task performance. The findings underscore the notion that persons in a cognitively demanding profession can experience subtle age effects, which are evident on fMRI and which impact daily functioning. Possible practical implications for middle-aged schoolteachers are discussed.Entities:
Keywords: aging; episodic memory; fMRI; mental fatigue; middle age; schoolteachers
Year: 2016 PMID: 27092068 PMCID: PMC4823302 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00148
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Hum Neurosci ISSN: 1662-5161 Impact factor: 3.169
Neuropsychological test scores.
| Young | Middle age | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | Range | Mean | SD | Range | |||
| WLT immediate free recall | 12.5 | 1.9 | 9–15 | 10.9 | 2.3 | 7–14 | 2.03 | 0.053 |
| WLT delayed free recall | 10.9 | 3.2 | 5–15 | 9.9 | 2.4 | 6–14 | 0.96 | 0.298 |
| WLT delayed cued recall | 14.4 | 0.8 | 13–15 | 14.3 | 1.1 | 12–15 | 0.28 | 0.783 |
| Digit span | 17.5 | 2.6 | 14–24 | 16.8 | 4.0 | 12–24 | 0.55 | 0.584 |
| LDST | 57.0 | 8.1 | 42–70 | 52.7 | 7.0 | 37–66 | 1.53 | 0.137 |
| Letter fluency* | 13.6 | 3.0 | 8–18 | 17.2 | 4.7 | 9–23 | 2.03 | 0.021 |
| Dutch adult reading test** | 80.9 | 7.8 | 65–90 | 88.9 | 4.7 | 82–96 | 3.35 | 0.003 |
Significant age group differences: *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01. Abbreviations: WLT, visual verbal word learning test; LDST, letter digit substitution test.
Figure 1Mean subjective ratings (± SE) before the manipulation (time 0), between the manipulation and the fMRI tasks (time 1), and after the fMRI tasks (time 2).
Encoding task trials classified according to subsequent recognition task performance.
| Young | Middle age | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Fatigue | Control | Fatigue | |
| Subsequently recognized | 0.59 (0.16) | 0.61 (0.12) | 0.48 (0.22) | 0.50 (0.22) |
| Subsequently forgotten | 0.40 (0.16) | 0.37 (0.10) | 0.50 (0.21) | 0.49 (0.20) |
| Reaction time (ms) | ||||
| Subsequently recognized | 1106 (149) | 1106 (158) | 1182 (124) | 1187 (142) |
| Subsequently forgotten | 1092 (125) | 1087 (144) | 1151 (141) | 1145 (130) |
Mean (standard deviation).
Recognition task performance.
| Young | Middle age | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response type | Control | Fatigue | Control | Fatigue |
| Recognized | 0.59 (0.16) | 0.61 (0.12) | 0.48 (0.22) | 0.50 (0.22) |
| False alarms | 0.15 (0.07) | 0.18 (0.12) | 0.09 (0.09) | 0.10 (0.11) |
| Corrected recognition | 0.44 (0.14) | 0.43 (0.14) | 0.39 (0.16) | 0.40 (0.17) |
| Recognized | 0.15 (0.11) | 0.16 (0.10) | 0.19 (0.11) | 0.17 (0.07) |
| False alarms | 0.16 (0.11) | 0.17 (0.13) | 0.13 (0.09) | 0.12 (0.07) |
| Corrected recognition | 0.01 (0.12) | 0.02 (0.08) | 0.06 (0.14) | 0.05 (0.08) |
Mean (standard deviation) proportion of responses from the correctly categorized words. Corrected recognition = proportion of recognized minus false alarms. Note: since subsequently recognized words are defined as high confidence hits, the proportions of high confidence recognized words in this table match those in Table .
Task-related brain activation associated with successful encoding.
| MNI coordinates | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Region | BA | Cluster size (voxels) | |||||
| ACC/DMPFC | L | 32/9 | −9 | 39 | 39 | 3.81 | 38* |
| ACC | R | 32 | 9 | 24 | 12 | 4.12 | 108* |
| VLPFC | L | 6 | −39 | 3 | 27 | 5.35 | 428* |
| Putamen | L | – | −21 | 15 | 0 | 3.37 | 11* |
Abbreviations: L, left, R, right, BA, Brodmann area, ACC, Anterior cingulate cortex, DMPFC, dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, VLPFC, Ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, OFC, Orbital frontal cortex, MNI, Montreal Neurological Institute space. Cluster level significance: *p.
Areas showing greater activation during successful encoding in middle-aged than in young teachers.
| MNI coordinates | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Region | BA | pFWE-SVC | |||||
| Dorsomedial PFC | L | 9 | −3 | 48 | 39 | 2.96 | 0.097 |
| Dorsolateral PFC | L | 9 | −27 | 18 | 45 | 3.15 | 0.066 |
| Orbital frontal | L | 45 | −48 | 42 | −3 | 3.78 | 0.015 |
| L | 45 | −48 | 42 | −9 | 3.61 | 0.023 | |
| L | 45 | −45 | 48 | −9 | 3.35 | 0.042 | |
Abbreviations: L, left, R, right, BA, Brodmann area, PFC, prefrontal cortex, MNI, Montreal Neurological Institute space, FWE-SVC, Family Wise Error-Small Volume Corrected.
Figure 2A multislice view of activation effects in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) significant at Locations of the slides are signified by the y coordinates, presented in blue at the top of the images. Green blobs illustrate the main effect of age group on successful memory encoding activation: greater dorsomedial, dorsolateral and orbital frontal PFC activation in middle-aged compared to young teachers. Red blobs illustrate the main effect of fatigue condition on successful encoding activation: decreased anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) activation in the fatigue compared to control condition (y = 16) as well as the interaction between group and fatigue condition: only the middle-aged teachers showed a significant reduction in activity in the fatigue condition compared to the control condition, and activation of this area in the control condition was higher in middle-aged compared to young teachers (y = 32).
Figure 3The interaction between the effect of age group and fatigue condition on successful encoding activation in the left ACC (error bars show 90% confidence intervals).