Literature DB >> 27092010

Reply to Myrseth and Wollbrant: Our model is consistent with altruism, and helps to explain its evolution.

Adam Bear1, David G Rand2.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2016        PMID： 27092010      PMCID： PMC4983852          DOI： 10.1073/pnas.1603854113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN： 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

1.  Social heuristics and social roles: Intuition favors altruism for women but not for men.

Authors:  David G Rand; Victoria L Brescoll; Jim A C Everett; Valerio Capraro; Hélène Barcelo
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2016-02-25

2.  Social heuristics shape intuitive cooperation.

Authors:  David G Rand; Alexander Peysakhovich; Gordon T Kraft-Todd; George E Newman; Owen Wurzbacher; Martin A Nowak; Joshua D Greene
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 14.919

3.  Models inconsistent with altruism cannot explain the evolution of human cooperation.

Authors:  Kristian Ove R Myrseth; Conny E Wollbrant
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Spontaneous giving and calculated greed.

Authors:  David G Rand; Joshua D Greene; Martin A Nowak
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Intuition, deliberation, and the evolution of cooperation.

Authors:  Adam Bear; David G Rand
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 12.779
  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Contextualised strong reciprocity explains selfless cooperation despite selfish intuitions and weak social heuristics.

Authors:  Ozan Isler; Simon Gächter; A John Maule; Chris Starmer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 4.379
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.