Literature DB >> 21790582

Epistasis buffers the fitness effects of rifampicin- resistance mutations in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Alex R Hall1, R Craig MacLean.   

Abstract

Epistatic interactions between resistance mutations in antibiotic-free environments potentially play a crucial role in the spread of resistance in pathogen populations by determining the fitness cost associated with resistance. We used an experimental evolution approach to test for epistatic interactions between 14 different pairs of rifampicin mutations in the pathogenic bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa in 42 different rifampicin-free environments. First, we show that epistasis between rifampicin-resistance mutations tends to be antagonistic: the fitness effect of having two mutations is generally smaller than that predicted from the effects of individual mutations on the wild-type. Second, we show that sign epistasis between resistance mutations is both common and strong; most notably, pairs of deleterious resistance mutations often partially or completely compensate for each others' costs, revealing a novel mechanism for compensatory adaptation. These results suggest that antagonistic epistasis between intragenic resistance mutations may be a key determinant of the cost of antibiotic resistance and compensatory adaptation in pathogen populations.
© 2011 The Author(s). Evolution© 2011 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21790582     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01302.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  37 in total

1.  Effects of sequential and simultaneous applications of bacteriophages on populations of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in vitro and in wax moth larvae.

Authors:  Alex R Hall; Daniel De Vos; Ville-Petri Friman; Jean-Paul Pirnay; Angus Buckling
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 2.  Evolutionary consequences of drug resistance: shared principles across diverse targets and organisms.

Authors:  Diarmaid Hughes; Dan I Andersson
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  Modification of Escherichia coli-bacteriophage interactions by surfactants and antibiotics in vitro.

Authors:  Pauline D Scanlan; Anna M Bischofberger; Alex R Hall
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 4.194

4.  Evolutionary rescue from extinction is contingent on a lower rate of environmental change.

Authors:  Haley A Lindsey; Jenna Gallie; Susan Taylor; Benjamin Kerr
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-02-10       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  Antimicrobial resistance and virulence: a successful or deleterious association in the bacterial world?

Authors:  Alejandro Beceiro; María Tomás; Germán Bou
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 26.132

6.  Strong Environment-Genotype Interactions Determine the Fitness Costs of Antibiotic Resistance In Vitro and in an Insect Model of Infection.

Authors:  C James Manktelow; Elitsa Penkova; Lucy Scott; Andrew C Matthews; Ben Raymond
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Within-host competition and drug resistance in the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum.

Authors:  Mary Bushman; Lindsay Morton; Nancy Duah; Neils Quashie; Benjamin Abuaku; Kwadwo A Koram; Pedro Rafael Dimbu; Mateusz Plucinski; Julie Gutman; Peter Lyaruu; S Patrick Kachur; Jacobus C de Roode; Venkatachalam Udhayakumar
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 8.  Understanding, predicting and manipulating the genotypic evolution of antibiotic resistance.

Authors:  Adam C Palmer; Roy Kishony
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 9.  The heterogeneous evolution of multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Authors:  Borna Müller; Sonia Borrell; Graham Rose; Sebastien Gagneux
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 11.639

10.  Benefit of transferred mutations is better predicted by the fitness of recipients than by their ecological or genetic relatedness.

Authors:  Yinhua Wang; Carolina Diaz Arenas; Daniel M Stoebel; Kenneth Flynn; Ethan Knapp; Marcus M Dillon; Andrea Wünsche; Philip J Hatcher; Francisco B-G Moore; Vaughn S Cooper; Tim F Cooper
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.