Literature DB >> 27091885

A Biopharmaceutical Industry Perspective on the Control of Visible Particles in Biotechnology-Derived Injectable Drug Products.

Serge Mathonet1, Hanns-Christian Mahler2, Stefan T Esswein3, Maryam Mazaheri4, Patricia W Cash4, Klaus Wuchner5, Georg Kallmeyer6, Tapan K Das7, Christof Finkler8, Andrew Lennard9.   

Abstract

Regulatory monographs in Europe and the United States require drug products for parenteral administration to be "practically free" or "essentially free" of visible particles, respectively. Both terms have been used interchangeably and acknowledge the probabilistic nature of visual particle inspection. The probability of seeing a particle in a drug product container varies according to the size and nature of the particles as well as container and inspection conditions. Therefore, the term "without visible particles" can be highly misleading in the context of what is practically achievable. This may lead to differences in understanding between industry practitioners and regulatory agencies. Is this term intended to mean "zero particles", or is there any intention to distinguish between particle type such as "zero extraneous visible particles" or "zero proteinaceous particles"? Furthermore, how can "zero" particles as a criterion for release testing be reconciled with "practically free from particles" as stated in the definition and a low, justified level of proteinaceous particles after production?The purpose of this position paper is to review best practices in the industry in terms of visual inspection process and associated operator training, quality control sampling, testing, and setting acceptance criteria corresponding to "practically free of visible particles" and providing considerations when visible proteinaceous particles are deemed unavoidable. It also provides a brief overview of visible particle characterization and gives perspectives on patient safety. This position paper applies to biotechnology-derived drug products including monoclonal antibodies in late-phase development to licensed products. LAY ABSTRACT: In the 2011 monoclonal antibody monograph revision, European Pharmacopoeia experts acknowledged that protein products may also contain proteinaceous particles at release or that protein particles may form during storage. Indeed, industry experience has demonstrated that therapeutic proteins such as monoclonal antibodies can exhibit a propensity for self-association leading to the formation of aggregates that range in size from nanometres (oligomers) to microns (subvisible and visible particles). As a result, the requirement for drug product appearance for monoclonal antibodies was changed from "without visible particles" to "without visible particles unless otherwise authorised or justified". In our view, "practically free from particles" should be considered a suitable acceptance criterion for injectable biotechnology and small-molecule products, as long as appropriately defined. Furthermore, we argue that visual inspection is a suitable quality control release test and that "practically free from particles" is a suitable specification when adequately described. © PDA, Inc. 2016.

Entities:  

Keywords:  100% inspection; Lyophilized; Particle identification; QC sampling; Quality control sampling; proteinaceous particles; visible particles

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27091885     DOI: 10.5731/pdajpst.2015.006189

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PDA J Pharm Sci Technol        ISSN: 1079-7440


  4 in total

1.  Phase-Appropriate Application of Analytical Methods to Monitor Subvisible Particles Across the Biotherapeutic Drug Product Life Cycle.

Authors:  Roman Mathaes; Linda Narhi; Andrea Hawe; Anja Matter; Karoline Bechtold-Peters; Sophia Kenrick; Sambit Kar; Olga Laskina; John Carpenter; Richard Cavicchi; Ellen Koepf; E Neil Lewis; Rukman De Silva; Dean Ripple
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 4.009

2.  Artificial Intelligence Within Pharmacovigilance: A Means to Identify Cognitive Services and the Framework for Their Validation.

Authors:  Ruta Mockute; Sameen Desai; Sujan Perera; Bruno Assuncao; Karolina Danysz; Niki Tetarenko; Darpan Gaddam; Danielle Abatemarco; Mark Widdowson; Sheryl Beauchamp; Salvatore Cicirello; Edward Mingle
Journal:  Pharmaceut Med       Date:  2019-04

3.  Evaluating a Modified High Purity Polysorbate 20 Designed to Reduce the Risk of Free Fatty Acid Particle Formation.

Authors:  Nidhi Doshi; Kyle Ritchie; Tamanna Shobha; Jamie Giddings; Kathrin Gregoritza; Rosalynn Taing; Stephen Rumbelow; Jeff Chu; Anthony Tomlinson; Aadithya Kannan; Miguel Saggu; Si Kai Cai; Victor Nicoulin; Wenqiang Liu; Steve Russell; Lin Luis; Sandeep Yadav
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 4.200

4.  A Mechanistic Understanding of Monoclonal Antibody Interfacial Protection by Hydrolytically Degraded Polysorbate 20 and 80 under IV Bag Conditions.

Authors:  Aadithya Kannan; Jamie Giddings; Shrenik Mehta; Tiffany Lin; Anthony Tomlinson; Kyle Ritchie; Ian Shieh; Miguel Saggu; Nidhi Doshi
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 4.200

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.