Literature DB >> 27091735

Use of short roll C-arm computed tomography and fully automated 3D analysis tools to guide transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Michael S Kim1, John Bracken2, Peter Eshuis3, S Y James Chen4, David Fullerton4, Joseph Cleveland4, John C Messenger4, John D Carroll4.   

Abstract

Determination of the coplanar view is a critical component of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The safety and accuracy of a novel reduced angular range C-arm computed tomography (CACT) approach coupled with a fully automated 3D analysis tool package to predict the coplanar view in TAVR was evaluated. Fifty-seven patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis deemed prohibitive-risk for surgery and who underwent TAVR were enrolled. Patients were randomized 2:1 to CACT vs. angiography (control) in estimating the coplanar view. These approaches to determine the coplanar view were compared quantitatively. Radiation doses needed to determine the coplanar view were recorded for both the CACT and control patients. Use of CACT offered good agreement with the actual angiographic view utilized during TAVR in 34 out of 41 cases in which a CACT scan was performed (83 %). For these 34 cases, the mean angular magnitude difference, taking into account both oblique and cranial/caudal angulation, was 1.3° ± 0.4°, while the maximum difference was 7.3°. There were no significant differences in the mean total radiation dose delivered to patients between the CACT and control groups as measured by either dose area product (207.8 ± 15.2 Gy cm(2) vs. 186.1 ± 25.3 Gy cm(2), P = 0.47) or air kerma (1287.6 ± 117.7 mGy vs. 1098.9 ± 143.8 mGy, P = 0.32). Use of reduced-angular range CACT coupled with fully automated 3D analysis tools is a safe, practical, and feasible method by which to determine the optimal angiographic deployment view for guiding TAVR procedures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  C-arm computed tomography; Coplanar view; Image guidance; Transcatheter aortic valve replacement; X-ray aortography

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27091735     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-016-0886-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  11 in total

1.  Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery.

Authors:  Martin B Leon; Craig R Smith; Michael Mack; D Craig Miller; Jeffrey W Moses; Lars G Svensson; E Murat Tuzcu; John G Webb; Gregory P Fontana; Raj R Makkar; David L Brown; Peter C Block; Robert A Guyton; Augusto D Pichard; Joseph E Bavaria; Howard C Herrmann; Pamela S Douglas; John L Petersen; Jodi J Akin; William N Anderson; Duolao Wang; Stuart Pocock
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Optimal projection estimation for transcatheter aortic valve implantation based on contrast-aortography: validation of a Prototype Software.

Authors:  Apostolos Tzikas; Carl Schultz; Nicolas M Van Mieghem; Peter P T de Jaegere; Patrick W Serruys
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Multislice computed tomography for prediction of optimal angiographic deployment projections during transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Ronen Gurvitch; David A Wood; Jonathon Leipsic; Edgar Tay; Mark Johnson; Jian Ye; Fabian Nietlispach; Namal Wijesinghe; Anson Cheung; John G Webb
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 11.195

4.  Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients.

Authors:  Craig R Smith; Martin B Leon; Michael J Mack; D Craig Miller; Jeffrey W Moses; Lars G Svensson; E Murat Tuzcu; John G Webb; Gregory P Fontana; Raj R Makkar; Mathew Williams; Todd Dewey; Samir Kapadia; Vasilis Babaliaros; Vinod H Thourani; Paul Corso; Augusto D Pichard; Joseph E Bavaria; Howard C Herrmann; Jodi J Akin; William N Anderson; Duolao Wang; Stuart J Pocock
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-06-05       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  Potential role of three-dimensional rotational angiography and C-arm CT for valvular repair and implantation.

Authors:  Jonathan G Schwartz; Anne M Neubauer; Thomas E Fagan; Niels J Noordhoek; Michael Grass; John D Carroll
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  Automatic aorta segmentation and valve landmark detection in C-arm CT for transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Yefeng Zheng; Matthias John; Rui Liao; Alois Nöttling; Jan Boese; Jörg Kempfert; Thomas Walther; Gernot Brockmann; Dorin Comaniciu
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  Integrated 3D Echo-X-Ray navigation to predict optimal angiographic deployment projections for TAVR.

Authors:  Michael S Kim; John Bracken; Niels Nijhof; Ernesto E Salcedo; Robert A Quaife; John C Messenger; John D Carroll
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-08

8.  Prediction of optimal deployment projection for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: angiographic 3-dimensional reconstruction of the aortic root versus multidetector computed tomography.

Authors:  Ronald K Binder; Jonathon Leipsic; David Wood; Teri Moore; Stefan Toggweiler; Alex Willson; Ronen Gurvitch; Melanie Freeman; John G Webb
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 6.546

9.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Feasibility of C-arm computed tomography for transcatheter aortic valve replacement planning.

Authors:  Lorenzo Azzalini; Umesh C Sharma; Brian B Ghoshhajra; Sammy Elmariah; Ignacio Inglessis; Igor F Palacios; Suhny Abbara
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr       Date:  2014-01-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.