Literature DB >> 27090539

When to operate: online patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) can help decide.

William John Edward Reeve1, Daniel H Williams2.   

Abstract

We present a report on use of a web-based electronic patient-reported outcome measures (ePROMs) system to support decision-making for a patient with an osteoarthritic knee. After being placed on a waiting list for knee arthroplasty, the use of preoperative PROMs allowed the patient and surgical team to review ongoing disability, and, as a result, alter the management plan by deferring surgery. Ongoing clinical review and symptom management has been centred on ePROMs and has been tailored to the specific needs of the individual. PROMs data are increasingly becoming a necessary component of outcome measurement in many surgical areas. Often, these data are available to neither patient nor clinician in a way that prospectively allows meaningful management. This case highlights how ePROMs can directly influence patient care in real time. 2016 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27090539      PMCID: PMC4840686          DOI: 10.1136/bcr-2015-214153

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Case Rep        ISSN: 1757-790X


  8 in total

1.  Logistics of collecting patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in clinical practice: an overview and practical examples.

Authors:  Matthias Rose; Andrea Bezjak
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Use of patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice.

Authors:  Claire F Snyder; Neil K Aaronson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2009-08-01       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Comparison of patient-reported outcome measures following total and unicondylar knee replacement.

Authors:  P N Baker; T Petheram; S S Jameson; P J Avery; M R Reed; P J Gregg; D J Deehan
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2012-07

Review 4.  Impact of patient-reported outcome measures on routine practice: a structured review.

Authors:  Susan Marshall; Kirstie Haywood; Ray Fitzpatrick
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.431

5.  The effect of surgical factors on early patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) following total knee replacement.

Authors:  P N Baker; D J Deehan; D Lees; S Jameson; P J Avery; P J Gregg; M R Reed
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2012-08

6.  Prospects and challenges in using patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice.

Authors:  Constance H Fung; Ron D Hays
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2008-08-18       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  The applications of PROs in clinical practice: what are they, do they work, and why?

Authors:  Joanne Greenhalgh
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Interpretation of patient-reported outcomes for hip and knee replacement surgery: identification of thresholds associated with satisfaction with surgery.

Authors:  A Judge; N K Arden; A Kiran; A Price; M K Javaid; D Beard; D Murray; R E Field
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2012-03
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.