| Literature DB >> 27089847 |
Abhilash Ravikumar1, Anu Baby1, He Lin1, Gian Paolo Brivio1, Guido Fratesi1,2.
Abstract
We predict the induction or suppression of magnetism in the valence shell of physisorbed and chemisorbed organic molecules on <span class="Chemical">graphenen> occurring on the femtosecond time scale as a result of core level excitations. For physisorbed molecules, where the interaction with <span class="Chemical">graphene is dominated by van der Waals forces and the system is non-magnetic in the ground state, numerical simulations based on density functional theory show that the valence electrons relax towards a spin polarized configuration upon excitation of a core-level electron. The magnetism depends on efficient electron transfer from <span class="Chemical">graphene on the femtosecond time scale. On the other hand, when graphene is covalently functionalized, the system is magnetic in the ground state showing two spin dependent mid gap states localized around the adsorption site. At variance with the physisorbed case upon core-level excitation, the LUMO of the molecule and the mid gap states of graphene hybridize and the relaxed valence shell is not magnetic anymore.Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27089847 PMCID: PMC4835731 DOI: 10.1038/srep24603
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
The adsorption energies (E), graphene-molecule bond length (a ) and graphene carbon atom shift (a) are tabulated for the three species adsorbed on graphene.
| Pyridine | −0.60 | 3.22 | — |
| 4-Picoline radical | −0.51 | 1.64 | 0.41 |
| Pyridine radical | −0.22 | 1.58 | 0.54 |
Figure 1The minimum energy configurations of organic molecules from the top and perspective view for (a,b) pyridine (c,d) 4-picoline radical and (e,f) pyridine radical adsorbed on graphene. The yellow and red spheres represent C atoms of graphene and of the molecule, respectively. The blue spheres stand for N and smaller black ones for H atoms. The perspective view shown in (f) highlights the localized distortion in the graphene lattice when it covalently bonds with pyridine radical. There, a represents the molecule-graphene bond length and a is the displacement of the carbon atom of graphene covalently bonded to the radical, as measured with respect to its nearest neighbours.
Figure 2Ground state DOS and DOS projected onto the molecular orbitals for the (a) pyridine on graphene, (b) picoline radical on graphene and (c) pyridine radical on graphene are shown. Values are per spin channel and the spin-minority DOS and MOPDOS are reported with a negative sign in (b,c) panels. The plot was done with a Gaussian broadening (full width at half maximum) of 0.14 eV in Eq. 1.
Figure 3Same as Fig. 2, upon N 1s core-level excitation, for (a) pyridine on graphene, (b) picoline radical on graphene and (c) pyridine radical on graphene are shown. Values are per spin channel and the spin-minority DOS and MOPDOS are reported with a negative sign in panel (a). The plot was done with a Gaussian broadening (full width at half maximum) of 0.14 eV in Eq. 1, and of 0.07 eV in the insets which enlarge the region around the Fermi level in panels (b,c).
Figure 4Panels (a,b) plot the MIDGAP-l and MIDGAP-h states, respectively, formed by hybridizing the mid gap state of graphene with the LUMO of core-excited 4-picoline radical, and showing mostly bonding and anti-bonding amplitude contours, respectively. Panels (c,d) show the same states for a core-excited pyridine radical. Gas phase LUMO for 4-picoline and pyridine are plotted in the insets.
Figure 5Screening charge for (a) pyridine, (b) 4-picoline radical and (c) pyridine radical. The isovalue is 0.0034 e/Å3 and regions of electron accumulation/depletion are depicted in red and blue regions, respectively.