Literature DB >> 27087063

Refining peripheral blood smear review rules for neonatal inpatients in a South African academic laboratory.

J Vaughan1,2, N Alli1,2, K Mannaru1, Q Sedick1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Peripheral blood smear review (PBSR) is a labour-intensive test, and skilled morphologists are in short supply. It is therefore helpful for laboratories to establish rules for PBSR to improve laboratory efficiency. Previously published guidelines in this regard are useful, but make few recommendations specific to neonates. Neonatal blood is characterized by several peculiarities which would be considered pathological if present in adults. Consequently, smear review rules (SRR) are often triggered in neonates without significant value being added on review. This study aimed to assess and fine-tune the SRR triggered in neonatal samples in order to improve laboratory efficiency.
METHODS: Full blood counts collected from 188 neonatal inpatients of the Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital in South Africa were retrospectively reviewed, the triggered rules documented, and the value added on PBSR determined.
RESULTS: Smear review rules were triggered in 148 (78.7%) samples, with significant morphological abnormalities identified in 84 (54.4%), and a false-positive rate of 34.0%. In patients with unhelpful review, the commonest rules triggered were the flags querying the presence of abnormal lymphocytes, blasts or nucleated red blood cells. When one or more of these flags were triggered in the absence of any other SRR, PBSR was always noncontributory. Disregarding these flags in the current cohort would reduce both the review and the false-positive rates by >20% without increasing the false-negative rate.
CONCLUSION: False-positive smear review is common in neonates, and minor modifications to SRR can substantially reduce the smear review rate without increasing the false-negative rate.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  General hematology; laboratory automation; laboratory practice; neonatal hematology; smear review rules

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27087063     DOI: 10.1111/ijlh.12491

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Lab Hematol        ISSN: 1751-5521            Impact factor:   2.877


  1 in total

1.  An Automated Draft Report Generator for Peripheral Blood Smear Examinations Based on Complete Blood Count Parameters.

Authors:  Young Gon Kim; Jung Ah Kwon; Yeonsook Moon; Seong Jun Park; Sangwook Kim; Hyun A Lee; Sun Young Ko; Eun Ah Chang; Myung Hyun Nam; Chae Seung Lim; Soo Young Yoon
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 3.464

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.