Literature DB >> 27085363

MPFL graft fixation in low degrees of knee flexion minimizes errors made in the femoral location.

M Tyrrell Burrus1, Brian C Werner2, Jourdan M Cancienne3, F Winston Gwathmey3, David R Diduch3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the appropriate amount of knee flexion in which to secure the graft during medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction.
METHODS: Heavy suture was used to simulate graft tissue during MPFL reconstruction on eight fresh-frozen cadaveric knees. The sutures were passed through two transverse patellar tunnels and draped over a Kirschner wire at Schöttle's point on the femur. Suture displacement at the location of the wire was measured during knee range of motion from 0 to 135°. The wire's location was then moved to 3 additional locations (1 cm proximal, 1 cm distal, and 1 cm anterior), and the measurements were repeated.
RESULTS: Using Schöttle's point, the suture length did not vary throughout all ranges of knee flexion. The distal location resulted in a greater distance between attachment points (i.e. graft tightened) if the measurements began with the knee flexed and then brought into extension. Conversely, with the proximal location, the opposite occurred as the knee was extended (i.e. graft loosened). For all locations other than Schöttle's point, the amount of initial knee flexion for fixation was directly related to the amount of suture length change when the knee was brought into extension.
CONCLUSION: For non-anatomic femoral MPFL graft fixation locations, suture length (and thus graft length) in full extension becomes increasingly altered if the graft is secured in high degrees of knee flexion. Thus, graft fixation in lower degrees of knee flexion is recommended to minimize over or under tensioning the graft when the knee goes into extension if the graft position is placed in a non-anatomic location. To avoid this problem, fluoroscopy should be used to locate the anatomic footprint of the MPFL insertion. While recognizing the limitations of cadaveric research, this study is the first to provide any data to corroborate the widely used practice of securing the MPFL in lower degrees of knee flexion.

Keywords:  Cadaver; Knee flexion; MPFL; Schöttle’s point

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27085363     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-016-4111-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  31 in total

1.  Classification of lesions of the medial patello-femoral ligament in patellar dislocation.

Authors:  E Nomura
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  Anatomy and biomechanics of the medial patellofemoral ligament.

Authors:  A A Amis; P Firer; J Mountney; W Senavongse; N P Thomas
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction for recurrent dislocation of the patella: a preliminary report.

Authors:  J L Ellera Gomes
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 4.  Complications of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction: common technical errors and factors for success: AAOS exhibit selection.

Authors:  Miho J Tanaka; Matthew J Bollier; Jack T Andrish; John P Fulkerson; Andrew J Cosgarea
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Anatomical study of the medial patello-femoral ligament: landmarks for its surgical reconstruction.

Authors:  Anthony Viste; Florian Chatelet; Romain Desmarchelier; Michel-Henri Fessy
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 1.246

6.  Fluoroscopic control allows for precise tunnel positioning in MPFL reconstruction.

Authors:  Vera Jaecker; Benedikt Brozat; Marc Banerjee; Robin Otchwemah; Bertil Bouillon; Sven Shafizadeh
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-05-10       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction as an isolated or combined procedure for recurrent patellar instability.

Authors:  Julian A Feller; Anneka K Richmond; Jason Wasiak
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction in patients with lateral patellar instability and trochlear dysplasia.

Authors:  Timothy M Steiner; Roger Torga-Spak; Robert A Teitge
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2006-03-27       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Evaluation of medial patellofemoral ligament tears after acute lateral patellar dislocation: comparison of high-frequency ultrasound and MR.

Authors:  Guang-Ying Zhang; Lei Zheng; Hong-Yu Ding; En-Miao Li; Bai-Sheng Sun; Hao Shi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Isolated repair of the medial patellofemoral ligament in primary dislocation of the patella: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Svend Erik Christiansen; Bent Wulff Jakobsen; Bent Lund; Martin Lind
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.772

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  The medial patellofemoral complex.

Authors:  Alexander E Loeb; Miho J Tanaka
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2018-06

Review 2.  Avoiding Complications with MPFL Reconstruction.

Authors:  Marvin K Smith; Brian C Werner; David R Diduch
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2018-06

3.  Clinical outcomes after revision surgery for medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Andreas Chatterton; Torsten Grønbech Nielsen; Ole Gade Sørensen; Martin Lind
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Validity of intraoperative observation of graft length change pattern for medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Hiroki Katagiri; Kazumasa Miyatake; Toshifumi Watanabe; Masafumi Horie; Ichiro Sekiya; Takeshi Muneta; Hideyuki Koga
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-03-24

5.  Biomechanical comparison of single- and double-bundle medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Qing Wang; Wenhan Huang; Daozhang Cai; Huayang Huang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 2.359

6.  Factors Influencing Graft Function following MPFL Reconstruction: A Dynamic Simulation Study.

Authors:  Miho J Tanaka; Andrew J Cosgarea; Jared M Forman; John J Elias
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 2.501

7.  Current Concepts in the Management of Patellar Instability.

Authors:  Michael S Laidlaw; David R Diduch
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2017 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.251

8.  Sulcus-Deepening Trochleoplasty and Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction for Recurrent Patellar Instability.

Authors:  Michael S Laidlaw; Scott M Feeley; Jeffrey R Ruland; David R Diduch
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2018-01-15
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.