| Literature DB >> 27085358 |
Andreas H Gomoll1, Peter Angele2, Vincenzo Condello3, Vincenzo Madonna3, Henning Madry4, Pietro Randelli5,6, Nogah Shabshin7, Peter Verdonk8, Rene Verdonk8.
Abstract
Total knee replacement is an accepted standard of care for the treatment of advanced knee osteoarthritis with good results in the vast majority of older patients. The use in younger and more active populations, however, remains controversial due to concerns over activity restrictions, implant survival, and patient satisfaction with the procedure. It is in these younger patient populations that alternatives to arthroplasty are increasingly being explored. Historically, osteotomy was utilized to address unicompartmental pain from degeneration and overload, for example, after meniscectomy. Utilization rates of osteotomy have fallen in recent years due to the increasing popularity of partial and total knee arthroplasty. This article explores the indications and outcomes of traditional unloading osteotomy, as well as newer options that are less invasive and offer faster return to function.Entities:
Keywords: Early OA; High tibial osteotomy; Knee osteoarthritis; Overloading
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27085358 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-016-4123-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc ISSN: 0942-2056 Impact factor: 4.342