Literature DB >> 27084502

Does Use of a Variable Distal Femur Resection Angle Improve Radiographic Alignment in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty?

Denis Nam1, Sravya Vajapey1, Jacob A Haynes1, Robert L Barrack1, Ryan M Nunley1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The distal femur resection in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is commonly made using a fixed angle relative to an intramedullary rod. This study's purpose was to assess if a variable distal femur resection angle technique improves femoral component alignment in TKA.
METHODS: This was a review of primary TKAs performed by 2 surgeons. One surgeon used a fixed resection angle of 5° for varus and 3° for valgus knees ("fixed" cohort). The second used hip-knee-ankle (HKA) radiographs to measure the angle between the femoral anatomic axis and a line perpendicular to the femoral mechanical axis, which was used as the resection angle for each patient ("variable" cohort). Femoral component and HKA alignment were measured from standing HKA radiographs by 2, independent, blinded observers. Two hundred ninety patients were needed for power to detect a 15% difference in femoral component "outliers" (target of 0° ± 2°; significance = P < .05).
RESULTS: Three hundred twenty consecutive patients were included with no differences in age, body mass index, or preoperative deformity (P = .3-.8). A 5° resection angle was used in 46.3% of the variable and 80.0% of the fixed cohort patients. A total of 80.2% of femoral components in the variable and 63.1% in the fixed cohort were within 0° ± 2° (P = .002; 84.6% of variable and 56.3% of fixed for valgus knees, P < .001). The mean HKA alignment was improved in the variable cohort (-1.4° ± 3.3° vs -2.6° ± 3.3°, P = .001).
CONCLUSION: Use of a variable distal femur resection angle improves femoral component alignment after TKA.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  femoral alignment; fixed resection; intramedullary alignment; mechanical axis; variable resection

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27084502     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.01.070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  6 in total

1.  The fibular head projection is of limited use as a radiographic landmark in preoperative planning of total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Doerte Matziolis; Marius Meiser; Norbert Sieber; Ulf Teichgräber; Georg Matziolis
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Post total knee arthroplasty alignment of 347 consecutive obese patients receiving a fixed distal femoral cut of 6° valgus.

Authors:  Samantha Andrews; Edward Weldon; Christopher Stickley; Cass Nakasone
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-10-31

3.  Windswept deformities - An indication to individualise valgus correction angle during total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Gautam M Shetty; Arun Mullaji; Ahmed Adel Khalifa; Abhik Ray
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2016-10-27

4.  Femoral Component Varus Malposition is Associated with Tibial Aseptic Loosening After TKA.

Authors:  Bum-Sik Lee; Hyun-Ik Cho; Seong-Il Bin; Jong-Min Kim; Byeong-Kyu Jo
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Femoral Valgus Correction Angle for the Intramedullary Alignment Rod Is Strongly Associated with Femoral Lateral Bowing in Japanese Patients with Varus Knee Osteoarthritis Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yosuke Hattori; Nobuyuki Asai; Shotaro Mori; Ken Ikuta; Yusuke Kazama; Yusuke Iesaki; Shimpei Takahashi; Atsushi Kaneko; Tomotaro Sato
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2022-08-16

6.  An innovative three-dimensional method for identifying a proper femoral intramedullary entry point in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Lu-Yao Ma; Hong-Yu Wei; Fu-Yin Wan; Wan-Shou Guo; Jin-Hui Ma
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 2.628

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.