Courtney C Moreno1, Jennifer Hemingway2, Aileen C Johnson3, Danny R Hughes4, Pardeep K Mittal3, Richard Duszak5. 1. Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia. Electronic address: courtney.moreno@emoryhealthcare.org. 2. Harvey L. Neiman Health Policy Institute, Reston, Virginia. 3. Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia. 4. Harvey L. Neiman Health Policy Institute, Reston, Virginia; Department of Health Administration and Policy, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia. 5. Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia; Harvey L. Neiman Health Policy Institute, Reston, Virginia.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess changing utilization patterns of abdominal imaging in the Medicare fee-for-service population over the past two decades. METHODS: Medicare Physician Supplier Procedure Summary master files from 1994 through 2012 were used to study changes in the frequency and utilization rates (per 1,000 Medicare beneficiaries per year) of abdominal CT, MRI, ultrasound, and radiography. RESULTS: In Medicare beneficiaries, the most frequently performed abdominal imaging modality changed from radiography in 1994 (207.4 per 1,000 beneficiaries) to CT in 2012 (169.0 per 1,000). Utilization rates of abdominal MR (1037.5%), CT (197.0%), and ultrasound (38.0%) all increased from 1994-2012 (but declined briefly from 2007 to 2009). A dramatic 20-year utilization rate decline occurred for gastrointestinal fluoroscopic examinations (-91.9% barium enema, -80.0% upper gastrointestinal series) and urologic radiographic examinations (-95.3%). Radiologists were the dominant providers of all modalities, accounting for >90% of CT and MR studies, and >75% of most ultrasound examination types. CONCLUSIONS: Medicare utilization of abdominal imaging has markedly changed over the past two decades, with overall dramatic increases in CT and MRI and dramatic decreases in gastrointestinal fluoroscopic and urologic radiographic imaging. Despite these changes, radiologists remain the dominant providers in all abdominal imaging modalities.
PURPOSE: To assess changing utilization patterns of abdominal imaging in the Medicare fee-for-service population over the past two decades. METHODS: Medicare Physician Supplier Procedure Summary master files from 1994 through 2012 were used to study changes in the frequency and utilization rates (per 1,000 Medicare beneficiaries per year) of abdominal CT, MRI, ultrasound, and radiography. RESULTS: In Medicare beneficiaries, the most frequently performed abdominal imaging modality changed from radiography in 1994 (207.4 per 1,000 beneficiaries) to CT in 2012 (169.0 per 1,000). Utilization rates of abdominal MR (1037.5%), CT (197.0%), and ultrasound (38.0%) all increased from 1994-2012 (but declined briefly from 2007 to 2009). A dramatic 20-year utilization rate decline occurred for gastrointestinal fluoroscopic examinations (-91.9% barium enema, -80.0% upper gastrointestinal series) and urologic radiographic examinations (-95.3%). Radiologists were the dominant providers of all modalities, accounting for >90% of CT and MR studies, and >75% of most ultrasound examination types. CONCLUSIONS: Medicare utilization of abdominal imaging has markedly changed over the past two decades, with overall dramatic increases in CT and MRI and dramatic decreases in gastrointestinal fluoroscopic and urologic radiographic imaging. Despite these changes, radiologists remain the dominant providers in all abdominal imaging modalities.
Authors: B Dustin Pooler; Meghan G Lubner; David H Kim; Oliver T Chen; Ke Li; Guang-Hong Chen; Perry J Pickhardt Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2016-09-05 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Perry J Pickhardt; Peter M Graffy; Adnan Said; Daniel Jones; Brandon Welsh; Ryan Zea; Meghan G Lubner Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2019-01-15 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Perry J Pickhardt; Peter M Graffy; Ryan Zea; Scott J Lee; Jiamin Liu; Veit Sandfort; Ronald M Summers Journal: Radiology Date: 2020-08-11 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Peter M Graffy; Jiamin Liu; Perry J Pickhardt; Joseph E Burns; Jianhua Yao; Ronald M Summers Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2019-06-24 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Ruiyang Zhao; Diego Hernando; David T Harris; Louis A Hinshaw; Ke Li; Lakshmi Ananthakrishnan; Mustafa R Bashir; Xinhui Duan; Mounes Aliyari Ghasabeh; Ihab R Kamel; Carolyn Lowry; Mahadevappa Mahesh; Daniele Marin; Jessica Miller; Perry J Pickhardt; Jean Shaffer; Takeshi Yokoo; Jean H Brittain; Scott B Reeder Journal: Med Phys Date: 2021-07-09 Impact factor: 4.071