Salma Afifi1, Angela Michael2, Alexander Lesokhin3. 1. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA afifis@mskcc.org. 2. Josephine Ford Cancer Center, Henry Ford Hospital, Brownstown Township, MI, USA. 3. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To review the clinical pharmacology, efficacy, and safety of daratumumab and elotuzumab for the treatment of relapsed refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). DATA SOURCES: A literature search of MEDLINE, PubMed, the US National Institutes of Health Clinicaltrials.gov, the Food and Drug administration, and relevant meeting abstracts was conducted using the terms daratumumab, elotuzumab, multiple myeloma, anti-CD38, HuMax-CD38, HuLuc63, SLAMF7, and anti-CS1 STUDY SELECTION/DATA EXTRACTION: Human and animal studies describing the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of daratumumab and elotuzumab for MM were identified. DATA SYNTHESIS: Daratumumab (anti-CD38) and elotuzumab (anti-CS1) have been recently FDA approved for the treatment of RRMM after showing efficacy in clinical trials. Elotuzumab approval was based on phase III data, and daratumumab gained accelerated approval based on phase I/II trials. Daratumumab has demonstrated significant single-agent activity, with an overall response rate (ORR) of 36% in patients with a median of 4 prior lines of therapy. Elotuzumab has not been shown to have single-agent activity. But the efficacy of both these antibodies in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in RRMM showed an ORR exceeding 80%. Tolerability of elotuzumab and daratumumab seems to be acceptable, with the most common adverse event being infusion reactions. CONCLUSION: Daratumumab and elotuzumab have shown encouraging results in RRMM that led to their FDA approval. Both are well tolerated with minimal toxicities. Phase III clinical trials will define optimal combination and place in therapy of daratumumab and elotuzumab.
OBJECTIVE: To review the clinical pharmacology, efficacy, and safety of daratumumab and elotuzumab for the treatment of relapsed refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). DATA SOURCES: A literature search of MEDLINE, PubMed, the US National Institutes of Health Clinicaltrials.gov, the Food and Drug administration, and relevant meeting abstracts was conducted using the terms daratumumab, elotuzumab, multiple myeloma, anti-CD38, HuMax-CD38, HuLuc63, SLAMF7, and anti-CS1 STUDY SELECTION/DATA EXTRACTION: Human and animal studies describing the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of daratumumab and elotuzumab for MM were identified. DATA SYNTHESIS: Daratumumab (anti-CD38) and elotuzumab (anti-CS1) have been recently FDA approved for the treatment of RRMM after showing efficacy in clinical trials. Elotuzumab approval was based on phase III data, and daratumumab gained accelerated approval based on phase I/II trials. Daratumumab has demonstrated significant single-agent activity, with an overall response rate (ORR) of 36% in patients with a median of 4 prior lines of therapy. Elotuzumab has not been shown to have single-agent activity. But the efficacy of both these antibodies in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in RRMM showed an ORR exceeding 80%. Tolerability of elotuzumab and daratumumab seems to be acceptable, with the most common adverse event being infusion reactions. CONCLUSION:Daratumumab and elotuzumab have shown encouraging results in RRMM that led to their FDA approval. Both are well tolerated with minimal toxicities. Phase III clinical trials will define optimal combination and place in therapy of daratumumab and elotuzumab.
Authors: Paul G Richardson; Sundar Jagannath; Philippe Moreau; Andrzej J Jakubowiak; Marc S Raab; Thierry Facon; Ravi Vij; Darrell White; Donna E Reece; Lotfi Benboubker; Jeffrey Zonder; L Claire Tsao; Kenneth C Anderson; Eric Bleickardt; Anil K Singhal; Sagar Lonial Journal: Lancet Haematol Date: 2015-11-16 Impact factor: 18.959
Authors: Michel de Weers; Yu-Tzu Tai; Michael S van der Veer; Joost M Bakker; Tom Vink; Daniëlle C H Jacobs; Lukas A Oomen; Matthias Peipp; Thomas Valerius; Jerry W Slootstra; Tuna Mutis; Wim K Bleeker; Kenneth C Anderson; Henk M Lokhorst; Jan G J van de Winkel; Paul W H I Parren Journal: J Immunol Date: 2010-12-27 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: E Zocchi; L Franco; L Guida; U Benatti; A Bargellesi; F Malavasi; H C Lee; A De Flora Journal: Biochem Biophys Res Commun Date: 1993-11-15 Impact factor: 3.575
Authors: Michael S van der Veer; Michel de Weers; Berris van Kessel; Joost M Bakker; Shulamiet Wittebol; Paul W H I Parren; Henk M Lokhorst; Tuna Mutis Journal: Haematologica Date: 2010-11-25 Impact factor: 9.941
Authors: Marlies Oostendorp; Jeroen J Lammerts van Bueren; Parul Doshi; Imran Khan; Tahamtan Ahmadi; Paul W H I Parren; Wouter W van Solinge; Karen M K De Vooght Journal: Transfusion Date: 2015-05-18 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Yu-Tzu Tai; Myles Dillon; Weihua Song; Merav Leiba; Xian-Feng Li; Peter Burger; Alfred I Lee; Klaus Podar; Teru Hideshima; Audie G Rice; Anne van Abbema; Lynne Jesaitis; Ingrid Caras; Debbie Law; Edie Weller; Wanling Xie; Paul Richardson; Nikhil C Munshi; Claire Mathiot; Hervé Avet-Loiseau; Daniel E H Afar; Kenneth C Anderson Journal: Blood Date: 2007-09-28 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Balaji Balasa; Rui Yun; Nicole A Belmar; Melvin Fox; Debra T Chao; Michael D Robbins; Gary C Starling; Audie G Rice Journal: Cancer Immunol Immunother Date: 2014-10-07 Impact factor: 6.968
Authors: Nils Winkelmann; Max Desole; Inken Hilgendorf; Thomas Ernst; Herbert G Sayer; Christa Kunert; Lars-Olof Mügge; Andreas Hochhaus; Sebastian Scholl Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2016-09-17 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Kerstin Schütze; Katharina Petry; Julia Hambach; Niklas Schuster; William Fumey; Levin Schriewer; Jana Röckendorf; Stephan Menzel; Birte Albrecht; Friedrich Haag; Catelijne Stortelers; Peter Bannas; Friedrich Koch-Nolte Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2018-11-19 Impact factor: 7.561