Literature DB >> 27081638

Present laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in Japan.

Takeo Sato1, Masahiko Watanabe1.   

Abstract

In many clinical studies, laparoscopic surgery (LS) for colon cancer has been shown to be less invasive than open surgery (OS) while maintaining similar safety. Furthermore, there are no significant differences between LS and OS in long-term outcomes. Thus, LS has been accepted as one of the standard treatments for colon cancer. In the treatments of rectal cancer as well, LS has achieved favorable outcomes, with many reports showing long-term outcomes comparable to those of OS. Furthermore, the magnification in laparoscopy improves visualization in the pelvic cavity and facilitates precise manipulation, as well as providing excellent educational effects. For these reasons, rectal cancer has seemed to be well indicated for LS, as has been colon cancer. The indication for LS in the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer, which is relatively unresectable (e.g., cancer invading other organs), remains an open issue. In recent years, new techniques such as single-port and robotic surgery have begun to be introduced for LS. Presently, various clinical studies in our country as well as in most Western countries have demonstrated that LS, with these new techniques, are gradually showing long-term outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colectomy; Colorectal cancer; Laparoscopic surgery; Randomized controlled trial; Robotic surgery; Single-port surgery; Total mesorectal excision

Year:  2016        PMID: 27081638      PMCID: PMC4826961          DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v7.i2.155

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 2218-4333


  27 in total

1.  Long-term survival following laparoscopic and open colectomy for colon cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  M Theophilus; C Platell; K Spilsbury
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.788

2.  Short-term surgical outcomes from a randomized controlled trial to evaluate laparoscopic and open D3 dissection for stage II/III colon cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG 0404.

Authors:  Seiichiro Yamamoto; Masafumi Inomata; Hiroshi Katayama; Junki Mizusawa; Tsuyoshi Etoh; Fumio Konishi; Kenichi Sugihara; Masahiko Watanabe; Yoshihiro Moriya; Seigo Kitano
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Laparoscopic local excision of the cecum for cecal creeping tumor.

Authors:  M Watanabe; M Ohgami; T Teramoto; M Kitajima
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1997-04

4.  Cost structure of laparoscopic and open sigmoid colectomy for diverticular disease: similarities and differences.

Authors:  Anthony J Senagore; Hans J Duepree; Conor P Delaney; Sharmilla Dissanaike; Karen M Brady; Victor W Fazio
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy).

Authors:  M Jacobs; J C Verdeja; H S Goldstein
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1991-09

Review 6.  Surgical management of IBD--from an open to a laparoscopic approach.

Authors:  Léon Maggiori; Yves Panis
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 46.802

7.  Laparoscopic colectomy for sigmoid diverticulitis: a prospective study in the elderly.

Authors:  J J Tuech; P Pessaux; N Regenet; C Rouge; S Hennekinne; R Bergamaschi; J P Arnaud
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug

8.  Re-establish pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic-assisted sigmoid resection? Randomized trial.

Authors:  R Bergamaschi; J J Tuech; C Cervi; J P Arnaud
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Laparoscopic colectomy for sigmoid diverticulitis in obese and nonobese patients: a prospective comparative study.

Authors:  J J Tuech; N Regenet; S Hennekinne; P Pessaux; R Bergamaschi; J P Arnaud
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Laparoscopic versus open sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis.

Authors:  David M Lawrence; Michael D Pasquale; Thomas E Wasser
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 0.688

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.