Literature DB >> 2708150

Objective evidence of tinnitus in auditory evoked magnetic fields.

M Hoke1, H Feldmann, C Pantev, B Lütkenhöner, K Lehnertz.   

Abstract

The waveforms of the auditory evoked magnetic field in normal-hearing individuals and patients suffering from tinnitus are distinctly different. In tinnitus patients, the magnetic wave M200 (corresponding to the electric wave P200, or P2) is delayed and only poorly developed or even completely missing, while the amplitude of the magnetic wave M100 (corresponding to the electric wave N100, or N1) is significally augmented. A very characteristic feature turned out to be the amplitude ratio of the two waves M200 and M100. Below the age of 50, the amplitude ratio M200/M100 represents a clear-cut criterion to distinguish between tinnitus patients and individuals without tinnitus. In tinnitus patients, the ratio is less than 0.5, independent of age, whereas, in young and middle-aged normal-hearing individuals, it is greater than 0.5. Since in normal-hearing individuals the average amplitude ratio decreases linearly with age, the clusters of amplitude ratios of the two groups begin to overlap beyond the age of 50. The hypothesis is put forward that the decrease of the average amplitude ratio in normal-hearing individuals reflects a degenerative process, probably initiated by multiple exogenous and endogenous factors, which leads to sustained neural activity in the generators of wave M200 and eventually gives rise to the sensation of tinnitus. The absence or poor development of wave M200 is a concomitant phenomenon, resulting from the involved generators being less responsive to external stimuli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2708150     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(89)90028-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  14 in total

1.  Tuning out the noise: limbic-auditory interactions in tinnitus.

Authors:  Josef P Rauschecker; Amber M Leaver; Mark Mühlau
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 2.  Advances in neuromagnetic topography and source localization.

Authors:  G L Romani
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.020

3.  Electrophysiologic correlates of intensity discrimination in cortical evoked potentials of younger and older adults.

Authors:  Kelly C Harris; John H Mills; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-01-25       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Age-related differences in sensitivity to small changes in frequency assessed with cortical evoked potentials.

Authors:  Kelly C Harris; John H Mills; Ning-Ji He; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-05-23       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Reorganization of auditory cortex in tinnitus.

Authors:  W Mühlnickel; T Elbert; E Taub; H Flor
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-08-18       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Underlying mechanisms of tinnitus: review and clinical implications.

Authors:  James A Henry; Larry E Roberts; Donald M Caspary; Sarah M Theodoroff; Richard J Salvi
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.664

Review 7.  Neural mechanisms of tinnitus.

Authors:  T Lenarz; C Schreiner; R L Snyder; A Ernst
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Evidence for multiple generators in evoked responses using finite difference field mapping: auditory evoked fields.

Authors:  J E Moran; N Tepley; G P Jacobson; G L Barkley
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 3.020

9.  Tinnitus: its causes, diagnosis, and treatment.

Authors:  L M Luxon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-06-05

10.  Auditory brainstem response and late latency response in individuals with tinnitus having normal hearing.

Authors:  Sreeraj Konadath; Puttabasappa Manjula
Journal:  Intractable Rare Dis Res       Date:  2016-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.