Literature DB >> 27074986

The scaling of postcranial muscles in cats (Felidae) I: forelimb, cervical, and thoracic muscles.

Andrew R Cuff1,2, Emily L Sparkes2, Marcela Randau1, Stephanie E Pierce2,3, Andrew C Kitchener4,5, Anjali Goswami1, John R Hutchinson1,2.   

Abstract

The body masses of cats (Mammalia, Carnivora, Felidae) span a ~300-fold range from the smallest to largest species. Despite this range, felid musculoskeletal anatomy remains remarkably conservative, including the maintenance of a crouched limb posture at unusually large sizes. The forelimbs in felids are important for body support and other aspects of locomotion, as well as climbing and prey capture, with the assistance of the vertebral (and hindlimb) muscles. Here, we examine the scaling of the anterior postcranial musculature across felids to assess scaling patterns between different species spanning the range of felid body sizes. The muscle architecture (lengths and masses of the muscle-tendon unit components) for the forelimb, cervical and thoracic muscles was quantified to analyse how the muscles scale with body mass. Our results demonstrate that physiological cross-sectional areas of the forelimb muscles scale positively with increasing body mass (i.e. becoming relatively larger). Many significantly allometric variables pertain to shoulder support, whereas the rest of the limb muscles become relatively weaker in larger felid species. However, when phylogenetic relationships were corrected for, most of these significant relationships disappeared, leaving no significantly allometric muscle metrics. The majority of cervical and thoracic muscle metrics are not significantly allometric, despite there being many allometric skeletal elements in these regions. When forelimb muscle data were considered in isolation or in combination with those of the vertebral muscles in principal components analyses and MANOVAs, there was no significant discrimination among species by either size or locomotory mode. Our results support the inference that larger felid species have relatively weaker anterior postcranial musculature compared with smaller species, due to an absence of significant positive allometry of forelimb or vertebral muscle architecture. This difference in strength is consistent with behavioural changes in larger felids, such as a reduction of maximal speed and other aspects of locomotor abilities.
© 2016 Anatomical Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Felidae; body mass; muscle; scaling

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27074986      PMCID: PMC5341599          DOI: 10.1111/joa.12477

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anat        ISSN: 0021-8782            Impact factor:   2.610


  45 in total

1.  Relationship between vertical ground reaction force and speed during walking, slow jogging, and running.

Authors:  T S Keller; A M Weisberger; J L Ray; S S Hasan; R G Shiavi; D M Spengler
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.063

2.  The late Miocene radiation of modern Felidae: a genetic assessment.

Authors:  Warren E Johnson; Eduardo Eizirik; Jill Pecon-Slattery; William J Murphy; Agostinho Antunes; Emma Teeling; Stephen J O'Brien
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-01-06       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Functional specialisation of pelvic limb anatomy in horses (Equus caballus).

Authors:  R C Payne; J R Hutchinson; J J Robilliard; N C Smith; A M Wilson
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  Forelimb indicators of prey-size preference in the Felidae.

Authors:  Julie Meachen-Samuels; Blaire Van Valkenburgh
Journal:  J Morphol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.804

5.  Integration of biomechanical compliance, leverage, and power in elephant limbs.

Authors:  Lei Ren; Charlotte E Miller; Richard Lair; John R Hutchinson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The cat step cycle: electromyographic patterns for hindlimb muscles during posture and unrestrained locomotion.

Authors:  S Rasmussen; A K Chan; G E Goslow
Journal:  J Morphol       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 1.804

7.  [On the function of relative hierarchy of moods (shown by the example of the phylogenetic and ontogenetic development of predatory behavior in beasts of prey)].

Authors:  P Leyhausen
Journal:  Z Tierpsychol       Date:  1965-06

8.  Biomechanics of mammalian terrestrial locomotion.

Authors:  A A Biewener
Journal:  Science       Date:  1990-11-23       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Interspecific scaling of the morphology and posture of the limbs during the locomotion of cats (Felidae).

Authors:  Lisa M Day; Bruce C Jayne
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Functional anatomy of the cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus) forelimb.

Authors:  Penny E Hudson; Sandra A Corr; Rachel C Payne-Davis; Sinead N Clancy; Emily Lane; Alan M Wilson
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2011-02-21       Impact factor: 2.610

View more
  9 in total

1.  The scaling of postcranial muscles in cats (Felidae) II: hindlimb and lumbosacral muscles.

Authors:  Andrew R Cuff; Emily L Sparkes; Marcela Randau; Stephanie E Pierce; Andrew C Kitchener; Anjali Goswami; John R Hutchinson
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Functional myology of the thoracic limb in Pampas fox (Lycalopex gymnocercus): a descriptive and comparative analysis.

Authors:  Paulo de Souza Junior; Lucas Mucci Richter Pereira Dos Santos; Wilson Viotto-Souza; Natan da Cruz de Carvalho; Erick Candiota Souza; Carlos Benhur Kasper; Marcelo Abidu-Figueiredo; André Luiz Quagliatto Santos
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2018-10-14       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  Comparative forelimb myology and muscular architecture of a juvenile Malayan tapir (Tapirus indicus).

Authors:  Jamie A MacLaren; Brianna K McHorse
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  Biomechanics of predator-prey arms race in lion, zebra, cheetah and impala.

Authors:  Alan M Wilson; Tatjana Y Hubel; Simon D Wilshin; John C Lowe; Maja Lorenc; Oliver P Dewhirst; Hattie L A Bartlam-Brooks; Rebecca Diack; Emily Bennitt; Krystyna A Golabek; Roger C Woledge; J Weldon McNutt; Nancy A Curtin; Timothy G West
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Where Have All the Giants Gone? How Animals Deal with the Problem of Size.

Authors:  Taylor J M Dick; Christofer J Clemente
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 8.029

6.  Whole-limb scaling of muscle mass and force-generating capacity in amniotes.

Authors:  Peter J Bishop; Mark A Wright; Stephanie E Pierce
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 7.  From fibre to function: are we accurately representing muscle architecture and performance?

Authors:  James Charles; Roger Kissane; Tatjana Hoehfurtner; Karl T Bates
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2022-04-07

8.  Shape Covariation (or the Lack Thereof) Between Vertebrae and Other Skeletal Traits in Felids: The Whole is Not Always Greater than the Sum of Parts.

Authors:  Marcela Randau; Anjali Goswami
Journal:  Evol Biol       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 3.119

9.  Adaptation and constraint in the evolution of the mammalian backbone.

Authors:  Katrina E Jones; Lorena Benitez; Kenneth D Angielczyk; Stephanie E Pierce
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 3.260

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.