Literature DB >> 27080652

Deactivating Cochlear Implant Electrodes Based on Pitch Information for Users of the ACE Strategy.

Deborah Vickers1, Aneeka Degun2, Angela Canas2, Thomas Stainsby3, Filiep Vanpoucke3.   

Abstract

There is a wide range in performance for cochlear implant (CI) users and there is some evidence to suggest that implant fitting can be modified to improve performance if electrodes that do not provide distinct pitch information are de-activated. However, improvements in performance may not be the same for users of all CI devices; in particular for those with Cochlear devices using n-of-m strategies (ACE or SPEAK).The goal of this research was to determine for users of Cochlear devices (CP810 or CP900 series processors) if speech perception could be improved when indiscriminable electrodes were de-activated and this was also compared to when the same number of discriminable electrodes were de-activated.A cross-over study was conducted with 13 adult CI users who received experimental maps with de-activated channels for a minimum of 2 months and these were compared to optimised clinical maps.The findings showed that there were no significant benefits of electrode de-activation on speech perception and that there was a significant deterioration in spectro-temporal ripple perception when electrodes were switched off. There were no significant differences between de-activation of discriminable or indiscriminable electrodes.These findings suggest that electrode de-activation with n-of-m strategies may not be beneficial.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACE strategy; Cochlear implant; Electrode deactivation; Electrode discrimination; Electrode-neurone interface; Fitting; Mapping; Pitch ranking; Speech perception; n-of-m

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27080652     DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-25474-6_13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol        ISSN: 0065-2598            Impact factor:   2.622


  14 in total

1.  Deactivating cochlear implant electrodes to improve speech perception: A computational approach.

Authors:  Elad Sagi; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Comparison of the Spectral-Temporally Modulated Ripple Test With the Arizona Biomedical Institute Sentence Test in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Marshall Lawler; Jeffrey Yu; Justin M Aronoff
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Auditory performance of post-lingually deafened adult cochlear implant recipients using electrode deactivation based on postoperative cone beam CT images.

Authors:  Fabiana Danieli; Thomas Dermacy; Maria Stella Arantes do Amaral; Ana Cláudia Mirandola Barbosa Reis; Dan Gnansia; Miguel Angelo Hyppolito
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Imaging evaluation of electrode placement and effect on electrode discrimination on different cochlear implant electrode arrays.

Authors:  Ángel Ramos de Miguel; Andrea A Argudo; Silvia A Borkoski Barreiro; Juan Carlos Falcón González; Angel Ramos Macías
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Effects of electrode deactivation on speech recognition in multichannel cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Kara C Schvartz-Leyzac; Teresa A Zwolan; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2017-08-10

6.  The Effect of Advanced Age on the Electrode-Neuron Interface in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Jeffrey Skidmore; Brittney L Carter; William J Riggs; Shuman He
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 3.562

7.  Spectral-temporally modulated ripple test Lite for computeRless Measurement (SLRM): A Nonlinguistic Test for Audiology Clinics.

Authors:  David M Landsberger; Natalia Stupak; Justin M Aronoff
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  The effect of increased channel interaction on speech perception with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Tobias Goehring; Alan W Archer-Boyd; Julie G Arenberg; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Reducing Channel Interaction Through Cochlear Implant Programming May Improve Speech Perception: Current Focusing and Channel Deactivation.

Authors:  Julie A Bierer; Leonid Litvak
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 3.293

10.  A Site-Selection Strategy Based on Polarity Sensitivity for Cochlear Implants: Effects on Spectro-Temporal Resolution and Speech Perception.

Authors:  Tobias Goehring; Alan Archer-Boyd; John M Deeks; Julie G Arenberg; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-06-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.